I repeat again I believe in measurements. I never mentioned soundstage, prat, velvety, woody, sweet, whatever.
Te repito de nuevo que yo creo en las medidas. Yo nunca he mencionado escena, aterciopelado, cuerpo, dulce, etc.
Last edited:
No analogy. The coherent explanation (already given) is based on elementary circuit theory, as inDaniel quinn said:
DF96 said:
My comment about punctuation and spelling was addressed to someone who I assume is a native English speaker. I am impressed by the quality of English here from non-native speakers, but sometimes concerned by that from natives. Sorry if I offended anybody.merlin el mago said:
Let us hope that your legal submissions are based on a knowledge of English law and language, as our technical submissions are based on a knowledge of circuit theory.Daniel quinn said:
On what evidence do you base your belief? I assume you are well aware of what "evidence" means? You have conducted 'no-peeking' tests to confirm this? You are aware that claims of an unexpected nature conflicting with accepted knowledge require significant evidence?
I am not able to hear difference in sound between two brands of KP capacitors, metal film resistors etc. But I hear clear difference between two RCA plugs I have -Kimber ultra plate and WBT 0102 CU Nexgen .
Improvement approaches hard wired connection.
Do skeptics think that WBT design approach( low metal mass, OFC copper, direct gold plating etc) is the worst pseudo-science? I suggest them to try it with an open mind.
Improvement approaches hard wired connection.
Do skeptics think that WBT design approach( low metal mass, OFC copper, direct gold plating etc) is the worst pseudo-science? I suggest them to try it with an open mind.
I don't understand the disconnect here, it's pretty straightforward.
I did not invent the idea that RCA connectors sound the same. You can not say my position is an "idea". It's not. It's readily provable fact.
If you want to claim the opposite, you're going to have to come at it with equally compelling evidence that proves it, and at the same time, proves how the existing factual data is incorrect.
Hint: You can't.
See, this is what I'm talking about. Some poor goofball is going to read this crap someday and think it's true.
If you believe this, then please post some data or test results which prove it, otherwise, these types of statements are toxic.
You are not ready to spend your money on high price connectors. If you are, and not hear any difference, i suggest you collecting the stamps or planting flowers.
If your judicial system operates on the same basis to determine whether or not the defendant is guilty or not guilty, I would say your country is not one I would choose to live in.
"Your honor, I have seen nothing that would allow me to reasonably conclude that this man is innocent. Therefore, the court must convict."
If you state all RCA connectors sounds the same probe and give data and ABX test supporting your statement. I don't trust only in measurements or only in my ears.
At the same time, we shouldn't allow people to say things like "horses don't need water to survive" without pointing out that it's factually untrue, and could possibly result in the death of horses if people were to actually believe such nonsense.
There are literally thousands of ABX tests that have been conducted which prove me correct.
It's up to you, not me to come up with one that proves all the other thousands to be incorrect.
I would entertain any real data which caused me to change my views, just as the existing evidence gave me the view that I currently have.
So far all we have is subjective / anecdotal, which does nothing except prove how loud the masses can cry if it's suggested that their $200 RCA jack sounds no different from my $1.95 one.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.