Why crossover in the 1-4khz range?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I hear this so much that I have to point out the fallacy. Not all compromises are the same. Compromising on a $100,000 salary is not the same as compromising on a $50,000 one. This comment seems to try and put all compromises on an equal footing and that simply is not the case.

Not all compromises are the same, however I don't really want to discuss which compromises you or I or others would rather live with. You obviously have your preference and I have mine. Let's leave it at that and stay on topic.
 
You'd have to show me how ones does an "excellent implementation", i.e. one that does not have lobbing errors, etc. Sure along one axis you can do fine, but this is an over simplification of the problem.
...
KEF has done some excellent work here as my recent measurements show.

Kitchen radios are for casual off-axis listening. Lobing errors is wrong place to focus when designing excellent speakers for stereo listening in the spot.
I've had Kef Reference 205/2. My listening and measurement show that I would still select lobing errors instead of coaxial driver.
 
As the speaker is mostly 'linear phase' device, adding a linear phase eq to correct any anomaly makes the system more 'phase linear', if it makes any sense. Look at teh time domain. Of-course you don't make any one angle perfect, but look at trends. THats why suggested 5-45deg and to ignore on-axis.

Correction - what was meant that a speaker could be considered a minimum phase device and using a minimum phase eq will correct anomalies. Forget about linear phase eq, useless in the above situation.
 
Yes, but what are you supposed to do about crossover distortion? There's not a lot you can do. It's either not there, a la class A or high bias class AB, or present, a la optimally biased class AB amplifier or you've got GM doubling from exiting the class A region of a high bias class AB.

The only real solution to this is to use high efficiency on the end of class A.
Class D, thanks.
 
The Ncore measures like quite possibly the best amp you could buy.

Many people really enjoy the sound of the TPA3116D2 amp. Some have compared it with Hypex and like the 3116 better, and some have said it sounds like a good class A amp. 4300 posts and 430,000 views of this thread in 14 months is testament to the interest it produces.

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/class-d/237086-tpa3116d2-amp.html

A stock $30 TPA3116D2 with about $20 worth of mods in caps and inductors can sound quite amazing. Or you can buy a fully-built 3118 variant with high quality parts in a box with knobs for $50. If you haven't tried it, not much to lose and a lot to gain if you like it.
 
I hate to get off on tangents, but where does one buy such a thing?

Like everything else, one can buy on Amazon... 🙂

Champagne box with 24v supply:
Amazon.com: SMSL SA-36A Pro 20WPC TPA3118D2 Digital Amplifier AMP + 24V Power Supply Golden: Electronics

Black box with 12v supply:
http://www.amazon.com/SMSL-SA-36A-TPA3118D2-Digital-Amplifier/dp/B00L5Y5GOK/ref=sr_1_5?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1408036621&sr=1-5&keywords=tpa3118

Note that one can use a standard 19v laptop supply and that works great. Even better if you have a linear regulated supply.

Based on examination of circuit board in this model and from user's feedback, this amp sounds great stock out of the box as it has many of the "mods" one would apply if one started with a cheap $20 board (upgraded input caps, bootstrap caps, bootstrap snubber, upgraded power supply caps, upgraded inductors). The 3118 is the non-external heat sink version that is cooled by conduction to PCB so max output is 25 watts/ch at 4ohms.

41BrTkcAWNL._SX425_.jpg
 
hi
is there a thread in here around this amp?
I'm interested!
Like everything else, one can buy on Amazon... 🙂

Champagne box with 24v supply:
Amazon.com: SMSL SA-36A Pro 20WPC TPA3118D2 Digital Amplifier AMP + 24V Power Supply Golden: Electronics

Black box with 12v supply:
Amazon.com: SMSL SA-36A Pro 20WPC TPA3118D2 Digital Amplifier AMP + 12V Power Supply Black: Electronics

Note that one can use a standard 19v laptop supply and that works great. Even better if you have a linear regulated supply.

Based on examination of circuit board in this model and from user's feedback, this amp sounds great stock out of the box as it has many of the "mods" one would apply if one started with a cheap $20 board (upgraded input caps, bootstrap caps, bootstrap snubber, upgraded power supply caps, upgraded inductors). The 3118 is the non-external heat sink version that is cooled by conduction to PCB so max output is 25 watts/ch at 4ohms.

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
 
Last edited:
The Ncore measures like quite possibly the best amp you could buy.

I'd like to see a low level analysis of those just to be sure 🙂 Yes they do measure very well, but the distortion vs output power graph shows pretty high distortion at lower output powers, this could just be due to the scaling of the measurement with the necessary headroom for measuring up to high powers.

In other words it'd be nice if the maximum level was changed to measure up to say 2 watts re 8 ohms so the noise floor was capable of showing us whether or not the amplifier can do 0.0005% distortion at 1 watt or less.

Still the nCore are ridiculously expensive.

I have a pair of their other UCD amps on my subs and there they work great.

Many people really enjoy the sound of the TPA3116D2 amp.

Myself included. I have built several devices using the 3118. 4 channels run the surrounds in my surround set up. 2 channels run the near field set up in the area I work in when soldering etc and I've built two sets of powered loudspeakers that use variants on the same design.

From a brief measurement I made they did appear to throw up reasonable levels of higher order distortion products, but I haven't made a proper detailed measurement to confirm this.

Nevertheless they do sound very nice.
 
Well, I ordered a TPA3118D2 from here (free shipping):
SMSL SA-36A Pro 20WPC TPA3118D2 Digital Amplifier + Power Adapter - Professional Audio Store - Shenzhenaudio.com

So cheap that I might as well try it. Thanks for the suggestion. I have Ncore amps which are the cleanest and most transparent amps I've ever tried. I will do a comparison. 20W should work fine with my Klipsch K402 horn. Might be enough for my Abbeys as well.

You are welcome. You won't be disappointed. You may wonder why you spent so much on more expensive amps in the past. 🙂
 
I've had Kef Reference 205/2. My listening and measurement show that I would still select lobing errors instead of coaxial driver.

Do you have measurements? I ask because published measurements of the 201/2 and 207/2 show simple and absolute excellence in performance: flat and smooth axial frequency response, and smoothly declining polars. I'd be really surprised if a 205/2 was very different from those two.

Many people really enjoy the sound of the TPA3116D2 amp. Some have compared it with Hypex and like the 3116 better, and some have said it sounds like a good class A amp. 4300 posts and 430,000 views of this thread in 14 months is testament to the interest it produces.

I'm sure that amp is fine for people who don't like high-fidelity reproduction. I quickly looked over the spec sheet and didn't any variation of the phrase that really matters in class D amps: load invariant frequency response. That means the FR will stay constant regardless of the driven load. There aren't very many load invariant class D amps. The only ones of which I know are the Hypex (UcD and Ncore), Icepower ASX2 (not earlier versions), and Anaview ones. Hopefully there are others unknown to me as well, but most class D amps offered today are strictly low-fidelity or closed system* devices. No different from tube amps, really.

*amps that aren't load invariant are fine for closed systems, i.e. speakers with active crossovers designed using measurements of specific drivers powered by a specific amp channel. But for any broader application...why waste so much time getting the crossover right if the amp is going to screw up the frequency response anyway?
 
Last edited:
I'd like to see a low level analysis of those just to be sure 🙂 Yes they do measure very well, but the distortion vs output power graph shows pretty high distortion at lower output powers, this could just be due to the scaling of the measurement with the necessary headroom for measuring up to high powers.
Well, look again and compare...

http://www.cirrus.com/en/pubs/proDatasheet/CS4272_F1.pdf

What you see in fig 9.2 is the residual noise of the amp, and it is ridiculously low: 23uV, 125dB S/N at max power, 102dB at 1W, all this unweighted and with a 26dB gain ...
The straight downward line is the sign that the residual noise dominates, meaning that the distortion stays under that ultra low residual noise up to at least 10W, at any frequency.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.