Zen Mod said:
just to let you know that I didn't forgot your last mail ........ I'm just trying to send you something palpable, but work is sorta killing me this days 😉
Dont worry, I knew that allready😀 No need to hurry at all. But do you find the idea, any good? I mean, I thought it was a great idea, swapping out 78xx and 79xx's with small plugin shuntregs!
Maybe it is just one of those things that just sounds too good to be real?
🙂
steenoe said:
If you are talking about, what I think you are, I am looking forward to hear it sing, too. I never saw anything like it. Although I am re-working the entire garden right now, (Everything is gone, including the roots😀 ) I am sure I can find a few hours to get this thing build...😎
🙂
We are talking about what you think we are 😀
Husk: Kun en tåbe frygter ikke haven!
Magura 🙂
Magura said:
We are talking about what you think we are 😀
Husk: Kun en tåbe frygter ikke haven!
Magura 🙂
I knew you would say that

Magura said:
We are talking about what you think we are 😀
Husk: Kun en tåbe frygter ikke haven!
Magura 🙂
remember Only a silly fear ......... no the park
perfect for Bab thread
online danish to engrish translator , in haiku style ......... crazier than Jaccovitty himself .......

Zen Mod said:
remember Only a silly fear ......... no the park
perfect for Bab thread
online danish to engrish translator , in haiku style ......... crazier than Jaccovitty himself .......
![]()
Well, real close 😀
Magura 🙂
Excactly right😀 😀 But here is the correct translation:Zen Mod said:
remember Only a silly fear ......... no the park
perfect for Bab thread
online danish to engrish translator , in haiku style ......... crazier than Jaccovitty himself .......
![]()
Only a fool, doesnt fear the Pumpkin-man......
🙂
steenoe said:
Excactly right😀 😀 But here is the correct translation:
Only a fool, doesnt fear the Pumpkin-man......
🙂
hehehe
peach for ya :
http://www.hifi-forumi.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=8269
look for "Shiny"
Hi Choky
A little bit of topic my question but I trust in your opinion and your knowledge so I would like to ask you if is possible to modify these schematic to balanced mode how you did with your Aleph J .
Please let me know .
If yes what is your advise .
Thank you very much .
Greetings
A little bit of topic my question but I trust in your opinion and your knowledge so I would like to ask you if is possible to modify these schematic to balanced mode how you did with your Aleph J .
Please let me know .
If yes what is your advise .
Thank you very much .
Greetings
Hallo Gabor,
very interessting schematics,
have you ever built this amp?
The 2SA606 is hard to find, what is your substitude for this transistor?
With kind regards
Sam
very interessting schematics,
have you ever built this amp?
The 2SA606 is hard to find, what is your substitude for this transistor?
With kind regards
Sam
HI
I collected all the available parts , to replace the A606 transistor I will use BD140 .
These amp is a Japanese design , I would like to try it .
I read very good comment about .
Greetings
I collected all the available parts , to replace the A606 transistor I will use BD140 .
These amp is a Japanese design , I would like to try it .
I read very good comment about .
Greetings
I read very good comment about .
Please tell me the where?
Is it in japanese language?
Regards
Sam
Please tell me the where?
Is it in japanese language?
Regards
Sam
Hello
Here is it , you can read some comments on English.
Click on the amplifiers after open the page .
http://www.geocities.jp/mutsu562000/
Narsis!!
Greetings
Here is it , you can read some comments on English.
Click on the amplifiers after open the page .
http://www.geocities.jp/mutsu562000/
Narsis!!
Greetings
I´m moving over here from the Aleph h thread. It´s an old thread but I´m planning to build a headphone version of this amp and I have a couple of questions:
- Regarding the schematics in post #690. R17, 21, 22 and 23 are marked 1E2. Would that be 1ohm?
- It is suitable for high impedance headphones <300Ohms?
- If I understand the schematics correctly the input jfets are the only transistors in need of matching, correct?
Best Regards Christian
- Regarding the schematics in post #690. R17, 21, 22 and 23 are marked 1E2. Would that be 1ohm?
- It is suitable for high impedance headphones <300Ohms?
- If I understand the schematics correctly the input jfets are the only transistors in need of matching, correct?
Best Regards Christian
Last edited:
-1E2 - European for 1R2 , meaning 1.2 Ohms
- why not
-yes ; as I wrote in that other thread - they're either one 2SJ109BL ( unobtanium) or pair of 2SJ74BL , or newest LSK74B
- why not
-yes ; as I wrote in that other thread - they're either one 2SJ109BL ( unobtanium) or pair of 2SJ74BL , or newest LSK74B
Hi!
First a late thanks for your quick answer. I have a lot of matched 2SK170bl and it got me thinking. It is possible to simply swap the polarities of the schematics and swap the transistors for opposite polarities?
It is possible to do the following:
1. Swap the polarities of the schematics.
2. Replace Q1 for a matched set of 2SK170bl
3. Exchange q2,Q3 from bc556 to bc546
4. Exchange q4 and q5 from bc546 to bc556.
5. I plan to use it as a headphone amp so q6 qnd q7 would be IFR9610
Best regards Christian
First a late thanks for your quick answer. I have a lot of matched 2SK170bl and it got me thinking. It is possible to simply swap the polarities of the schematics and swap the transistors for opposite polarities?
It is possible to do the following:
1. Swap the polarities of the schematics.
2. Replace Q1 for a matched set of 2SK170bl
3. Exchange q2,Q3 from bc556 to bc546
4. Exchange q4 and q5 from bc546 to bc556.
5. I plan to use it as a headphone amp so q6 qnd q7 would be IFR9610
Best regards Christian
it's done already somewhere on the forum
maybe is better to chase few dozens of J271 and use them in schm as is
maybe is better to chase few dozens of J271 and use them in schm as is
It's apparent that Pao is backwards, and really doesn't like p-channel power devices. (especially the hump-backs) 

Thanks for a quick answer!
I think i found the thread you were referring to, "Inverted" Aleph J? I want to experiment a bit and the j271 doesn't seem to be easy to come by either. So by using my 2SK170bl i can build prototypes cheaper and easier. As i understand it the inverted version will not be sonically worse.
Best regards Christian
I think i found the thread you were referring to, "Inverted" Aleph J? I want to experiment a bit and the j271 doesn't seem to be easy to come by either. So by using my 2SK170bl i can build prototypes cheaper and easier. As i understand it the inverted version will not be sonically worse.
Best regards Christian
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- Babbelfish J PCBs