"Audio" grade capacitors

Status
Not open for further replies.
Y

Regarding COC vs. BOPP - my guess is that COC is not available in thin gauges. BOPP is available as low as 3 um and PET 0.9 um I'm not too familiar with COC, but perhaps is a cost issues as well.

The issue is unfamiliarity; you can make really thin films, it surface treats well for metalization, and the dielectric properties are superb. Did I mention the high tensile and Tg? Unfortunately, no-one is going to set up a film line to produce it for caps unless there's a market demand from the electronics industry, and in that sector, the material is almost unknown.
 
I can't understand why this has become a "put down Capman Thread".

Here we have a new Member, who IS a Manufacturer, willing to give an insight into capacitor characteristics and which ones may explain some of the "sound" consequences that are reported.

Let Capman speak.
Ask questions.
Offer alternative evidence if you have any.

But most of all, stop the put downs. That is the FORUM RULE !!

Capman,
esl and esr are frequently mentioned and discussed on this Forum.
I may have come across too strong but thanks for the support. I have thick skin 🙂

I will give my knowledge where ever possible, regardless if its received well or not.
 
I have reviewed those three posts and they say very little.

In post 69 he tells us that the foil and dielectric affect ESR, insulation resistance, DA and DF. Anyone who knows anything about capacitors would already know that.

In post 73 he says that audiophile caps from his company have unspecified 'specific techniques' in manufacture. OK, one piece of insight: not all audiophile caps are pure snake oil, some really are built differently.

In post 89 he tells us that capacitor polypropylene (for example) is not a pure generic product but varies slightly according to supplier and processing. I thought that was true of most (all?) plastics. Again he tells us that matters of foil and dielectric affect the capacitor characteristics. Unsurprising.

I am still waiting for some insight into how some caps have features (apart from the standard electrical properties) which mean they sound better in audio circuits. Now it may be that he can't tell us because that would involve giving away trade secrets, but that means we are left with no 'insight' but merely having to take on trust that an audiophile cap maker really does make better sounding caps. (In circuits where cap quality should make no difference?)
I have made some statement that contain good information - you might already have that knowledge, but others might not.
This subject is very complex and can not be answered in a few short posts on a forum. there is no easy answer to your question

If you would like to discuss any of these subject in more detail, by all means ask a question --

"how some caps have features (apart from the standard electrical properties) which mean they sound better in audio circuits" - the short answer is all of the above. As I mentioned in one of my other posts, the audio business is very subjective. I've been simply trying to point out that not all capacitors are made the same regardless of what they look like or for that matter, even if the OEM specification look the same.

I've been trying to give knowledge of construction, materials, etc to give a broad understanding of film capacitors. I will continue to do so - if information is below you, then why comment. If its above you, by all means let me know and I will try to explain it so that you understand. I do not need a forum to justify my knowledge - I was the original founder of this company, sold it, went on to more of a materials back ground, and came back to manage and grow the company.

Allow me to ask one question - in film capacitors, what characteristics effects ESR?
 
ESR 😕 ... no, I meant the way leads are connected the foil
Exactly - this is one of the manufacturing techniques I've been getting beat up on.

Metalized film uses an arc spray technique - more of a mechanical bond, no so much of a solder bond, but rather an impacting into the end of the winding. It can be further effected by the materials used for the arc spray.

The, how are the leads attached? Resistance welded or soldered?

How about the foils?
 
I'll see if I can do a sketch later or a photo. Basically, you have multiple leads in each end which are attached at a single point to the (probably) thermal spray zinc. Very useful for power supplies.

Hmm - we recently did a similar device for a HV PSU mfg - I don't normally get involved in the engineering or with the end customer, but perhaps it was for the same reason?

It could also reduce ESR & ESL 🙂
 
thanks to Sy and Capman57

Being a audio\music lover \ tech guy, I have bought many of the audio caps and have found the sound difference a worthwhile. But some are out of reach price wise to do much see if you like it testing. So knowing what makes a cap sound better or do a better job in a given app: power supply, x-over, signal path, by-pass , is of interest. going on what people say on the net is ok but most don't always have a good ear for upper hi-end audio.
Also if you know some of the ultra hi-end ones, Duelund, Jantzen, Mundorf
is there a justifiable reason for the high price. I have some of them and do enjoy the difference, so maybe that is the only reason needed. But as a tech I do like to know I am buying better product.
thanks
jjacks4x
 
Iv'e heard of "stacked film" type of capacitors; how does this type of construction stack up when compared to wound caps in regards to ESL / ESR?

oooh, that was bad😱

Stacked film is actually manufactured similar to wound film - actually almost exactly the same. The are wound on large oval shape mandrels than pressed and diced to size. The real difference would be cross section vs. length - if the stacked has a higher ration of cross-section vs. length, the ESR would be better.

oops - gave up one of my answers of what effects ESR & ESL
 
Status
Not open for further replies.