Numbers can't describe experience; numbers can't describe love.
That applies to music, but not so much to audio.
My father used to say, "Money can't buy you love, but it can buy you a hell of a lot of good looking women."
Our knowledge of love is indeed of a weak and insubstantial kind.
Our knowledge of love is indeed of a weak and insubstantial kind.
Yes indeed! I've been pointing out this first rule of advertising to friends and family for years. Few have ever noticed it. "Oh yeah.... you're right!" When you start seeing adverts thru that lens, it's pretty funny.First rule of advertising: Take your worst attribute and advertise it.
If your quality is terrible, advertise how great it is. ( "Quality is job...")
If your performance is terrible, advertise it as the best performing thing ever.
Etc.
First rule of advertising: Take your worst attribute and advertise it.
If your quality is terrible, advertise how great it is. ( "Quality is job...")
If your performance is terrible, advertise it as the best performing thing ever.
Etc.
How come that upon reading this the first two things that came to my mind were 'full-range' speakers with whizzer-coned drivers and flea-powered SET amps?
By the way anybody got an asbestos suit for sale? I might need one soon...
Numbers can't describe experience; numbers can't describe love.
But you need numbers and measurements to engineer a solution to music reproduction🙂
Numbers can't describe experience; numbers can't describe love.
But they can describe the meaning of life (in two digits).
Last edited:
'cause you don't know what sounds good? 😉
"Good" is such a relative and subjective term but to my ears whizzer cones are a truly terrible way to 'reproduce' treble.
Lowthers for example are by far the worst high $ speakers I have ever heard and no other driver since has managed to convince me that whizzers have any merit.
As for flea-powered SETs I simply don't know what to do with an an amp that has more distortion than my speakers and would run out of juice driving my tweeters. Mind you they do make excellent amps for guitar players who want to remain on speaking terms with their next-door neighbours. ;-)
True, but he was talking about science. Audio reproduction is applied science.tvrgeek said:Numbers can't describe experience; numbers can't describe love.

Surely audio reproduction is the application of magic, by dedicated Guru's hand picking components by ear to tailor the sound, aided by moonlighting Professor's (from their day job discovering new and amazing quantum effects from a parallel universe), with fantastical components that would even amaze Dr Spock... I believe it is called the 'Art of Noise'
😀
Great music ... 😉... I believe it is called the 'Art of Noise'
😀
Here is one more high-end:
Nine Inch Nails – Audiophile Master? Are You Kidding Me? | Ultra High-End Audio and Home Theater Review
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Nine Inch Nails – Audiophile Master? Are You Kidding Me? | Ultra High-End Audio and Home Theater Review
Some comments on NIN's audiophile master:
Nine Inch Nails' "Hesitation Marks" - Audiophile, or AudioFAIL ?
Nine Inch Nails' "Hesitation Marks" - Audiophile, or AudioFAIL ?
We all know the mental asylums are stacked with audiophools, who went bananas, after desperately attempting to locate the loudness-off button.
Whoa check out the comments in this posting about Ted Denney
Ted Denney's Excellent Adventure | Stereophile.com
Seems the two clowns, lets call them C and G trying to defend Ted's products come up with some pretty funny ways of expressing it. Seems they just don't like anyone using their brain to figure out what is snake oil.🙄 Of course they don't own any of the things but they sure know how it sounds and why anyone who thinks it's snake oil is WRONG 😛 Funny stuff. No wonder they are on Stereophile's forums and not here.
Ted Denney's Excellent Adventure | Stereophile.com
Seems the two clowns, lets call them C and G trying to defend Ted's products come up with some pretty funny ways of expressing it. Seems they just don't like anyone using their brain to figure out what is snake oil.🙄 Of course they don't own any of the things but they sure know how it sounds and why anyone who thinks it's snake oil is WRONG 😛 Funny stuff. No wonder they are on Stereophile's forums and not here.
You need a better SET and some speakers that aren't named "Power Soak", me thinks. 😉As for flea-powered SETs I simply don't know what to do with an an amp that has more distortion than my speakers and would run out of juice driving my tweeters.
And really - NIN and Audiophile? Seriously? What are people thinking? Isn't the whole point overdrive, distortion and annoying sounds? That's what sells, right?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- Funniest snake oil theories