If there was ever a topic that merits the uncensoring of the acronym for bulls hit the Bybee Quantum Purifier surely is the one!
No, it was also the thread where a couple of guys claimed that bit-identical files off the same HD sound different if they originally came from different media. Maybe you should open a Peter Belt Frozen Photo discussion...?
So two bulls are walking through a tough neighborhood and meet up with a rhinocerous, who spits in the bulls' general direction. Recognizing that a rhino is a bit much for one bull to take onalone, the two bulls hit the rhino simulataneously, winning the confrontation!
Geez, John. How 'bout some proof that it IS what you say it is.
Or that it does what you say it does.
Or that it does what you say it does.
There's no argument, it's exactly what you say it is. You said it would measure like a conventional resistor, wouldn't affect noise, and that its effects couldn't be heard without peeking. And you were absolutely right.
Pano, Pano, Pano. Poor naive Pano. Don't you understand? Proof and data are not the responsibility of people peddling **.
Oh, hell, I forgot, we wore out those letters.
When a device is recommended for reducing noise audibly and it can't demonstrate some dB less noise floor after applied on some signal or PSU, end of story in my view. Argument 
But it's not just regular noise, it's QUANTUM noise. That's why you need carbon nanotubes, otherwise, the quantums have too much space to rattle around..
I can't hear quantum quanto quaint queer. I can hear a capacitor multiplier cutting PSU noise on a low PSRR MC head amp when I crank up the volume pot. All else is funny stories and completely boring to me. Thanks SY for measuring it in a sane way. Good info.
OK, SY has PROVED his criticisms by demanding proof of me, even though he COULD have physically examined the device, even sent it out for material analysis. Also, he has discounted MY subjective input, and Jack Bybee's test evidence. So much for the march of science! ;-)
CNUSAgrbge
I'm still waiting for picowires and femtoferrets to appear in the descriptions of some of these mega-effectors 😕😉😀
http://books.google.com/books?id=zg...&ved=0CCUQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=picowire&f=false
geesh... someone already thought of this...😀
John L.
I'm still waiting for picowires and femtoferrets to appear in the descriptions of some of these mega-effectors 😕😉😀
http://books.google.com/books?id=zg...&ved=0CCUQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=picowire&f=false
geesh... someone already thought of this...😀
John L.
Last edited:
John,
Are you just making stuff up or has it been a case of too much aluminum in the cookware? I *did* physically examine the device exterior and you even commented at the time. The claims regarding its size and lead materials were false. Not copper leads, they're magnetic. The device is much smaller than advertised.
But it really is 25 milliohms!
Are you just making stuff up or has it been a case of too much aluminum in the cookware? I *did* physically examine the device exterior and you even commented at the time. The claims regarding its size and lead materials were false. Not copper leads, they're magnetic. The device is much smaller than advertised.
But it really is 25 milliohms!
SY, you bought the CHEAPEST version of the SMALL quantum purifier. It HAS COPPERWELD leads that are magnetic as they are steel with a copper overlay. This is a standard military spec lead. There are two other versions of the SAME basic device that have silver and gold/silver leads, AND they are non-magnetic. So what? AND what did you find about the exterior? That it is some sort of heat-shrink material. Well, whoop-de-do! What a breakthrough! Is this all there is to know? Send in the Clowns! ;-)
- Status
- Not open for further replies.