I'm looking for tweeters which allow center to center spacing on the order of ~2 cm.
Are there any such as might be found in laptop computers that would meet this?
Are there any such as might be found in laptop computers that would meet this?
Dave,
I had not. The fs of 4K is a killer, though.
I've heard of drivers which are installed in laptops which have a ~500 hz fs. That would be the ticket. I'm trying to find a source for them.
I had not. The fs of 4K is a killer, though.
I've heard of drivers which are installed in laptops which have a ~500 hz fs. That would be the ticket. I'm trying to find a source for them.
Maybe Don Keele can get you some of those he uses. You can always ask.
I think I heard the P.E. crew talking about carrying them. So maybe...
I think I heard the P.E. crew talking about carrying them. So maybe...
Projects Unlimited, CUI, and of course Tang Band make mini speakers. If you want a tweeter that small that goes down that low, you're probably looking for a mini/laptop speaker. PE has the 3/4" listed in "extended range",
http://www.parts-express.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?Partnumber=264-882
Most of them are not so flat.
http://www.parts-express.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?Partnumber=264-882
Most of them are not so flat.
Last edited:
Dave,
I had not. The fs of 4K is a killer, though.
I've heard of drivers which are installed in laptops which have a ~500 hz fs. That would be the ticket. I'm trying to find a source for them.
Hi,
The laptop drivers due to the Fs will have pathetic sensistivity and output.
See the HiVi B1S here : Zaph|Audio
Use in multiples will solve both problems but your heading towards line arrays.
High Fs is part and parcel of very small tweeters, it typically allows 3rd
order rolloffs with a single capacitor, or 4th order with an added inductor.
It makes the c/o far cheaper to implement for correct power handling,
to be more correct for avoiding distortion due to overexcursion low down.
If you want a lot of them Apex Jr do a nice Audax made
(the best) mini tweeter for $1 each or $85 for a 100,
It allows very tight spacing, Fs I'd say around 2KHz.
/Sreten.
Last edited:
Alright. I grabbed a Dayton ND20FA and bored a 13/64" hole in the center of the magnet structure, then ran a countersink a little more than halfway into the pole material on both sides. I had to completely disassemble the tweeter to get it done. Put it back together, after quite a gap cleaning job, and with the bottom of the tweeter suspended off the bench with some blocks I got 575 Hz resonant frequency.
This is something I've been wanting to do on my own anyway..
I also got a chance to seriously inspect the construction. I noticed the coil former was not glued quite colinear with suspension travel, in hifi terms you could call it way off.
A simple plug is probably cheaper than a cylinder magnet, possibly the reason for using the former aside from the fact that it wasn't to be a vented design anyway. The pole material, judging by leakage, is still highly saturated and the removal of a small volume of material in the center probably will not reduce gap flux very much. The gap is pretty large, probably too large to run without ferrofluid. I didn't measure.
Long story short, you might be looking for a vented neo tweeter. I've never seen one so can't recommend any production models. The ND20FA could be redesigned with one but maybe the lead wires would have to come off the coil more at a tangent than somewhat perpendicular as they do. They are tinsel at least. Power handling would be further limited. Ferrofluid wont help trying to hit minimum Fs. Of course lower Fs means less efficiency.
This is something I've been wanting to do on my own anyway..
I also got a chance to seriously inspect the construction. I noticed the coil former was not glued quite colinear with suspension travel, in hifi terms you could call it way off.
A simple plug is probably cheaper than a cylinder magnet, possibly the reason for using the former aside from the fact that it wasn't to be a vented design anyway. The pole material, judging by leakage, is still highly saturated and the removal of a small volume of material in the center probably will not reduce gap flux very much. The gap is pretty large, probably too large to run without ferrofluid. I didn't measure.
Long story short, you might be looking for a vented neo tweeter. I've never seen one so can't recommend any production models. The ND20FA could be redesigned with one but maybe the lead wires would have to come off the coil more at a tangent than somewhat perpendicular as they do. They are tinsel at least. Power handling would be further limited. Ferrofluid wont help trying to hit minimum Fs. Of course lower Fs means less efficiency.
Last edited:
If you want a lot of them Apex Jr do a nice Audax made
(the best) mini tweeter for $1 each or $85 for a 100,
It allows very tight spacing, Fs I'd say around 2KHz.
That tweeter has to be one of the bargains of the century... it can outperform units 10x the cost. (reminds me that i need to get another batch -- i've gone thru probably 100 so far).
It is hard to say where the Fs of this tweeter actually is, as the ferrofluid seems to be removing any hint of an impedance spike (see attachment). Limitations are excursion limited... i usually XOed them (singly) at 10k + 1st order, but there is more to be had down low i'm sure.
dave
Attachments
I was thinking maybe Ed had an actual application for a 500 Hz Fs tweeter at around 20mm diameter. You'll never get one of those little mylar tweeters to resonate that low unless you drill a bunch of holes around the suspension and then it will probably have severely limited excursion capability.
FWIW I replaced the ferrofluid with whatever grade it is that I have and the Fs didn't move much at all, it's just much lower Q.
I doubt it would be very linear for much drive level in the ~1kHz range, if that's the idea. By eye the coil seems to be about as tall as the gap. It would be impossible to actually measure this without total destruction.
The OD of the diaphram frame, which can't reasonably be minimized, is about 30mm.
If 20mm is a more critical design driver you could possibly start with the 5/8" dome. Though if you need more than 2 I don't think modification would be the way to go.
FWIW I replaced the ferrofluid with whatever grade it is that I have and the Fs didn't move much at all, it's just much lower Q.
I doubt it would be very linear for much drive level in the ~1kHz range, if that's the idea. By eye the coil seems to be about as tall as the gap. It would be impossible to actually measure this without total destruction.
The OD of the diaphram frame, which can't reasonably be minimized, is about 30mm.
If 20mm is a more critical design driver you could possibly start with the 5/8" dome. Though if you need more than 2 I don't think modification would be the way to go.
Last edited:
Keele, being associated with harmon, would of course have access to the inverted JBL domes 1st seen as a 25mm unit in iMacs (and shortly after HK soundsticks). I have 35mm versions too, so a smaller unit makes sense too. Not very efficient, but quite a good driver.
iBall/JBL Odessy
dave

iBall/JBL Odessy
dave
Sort of like this:
Alnico, Ferrite, Low Profile Speakers | CUI Inc
,which look like a lot of fun until you look at the response. Maybe there's some better ones out there.
Anyway, here's what the Dayton looks like:
Alnico, Ferrite, Low Profile Speakers | CUI Inc
,which look like a lot of fun until you look at the response. Maybe there's some better ones out there.
Anyway, here's what the Dayton looks like:
Attachments
There also this thing:
http://www.tb-speaker.com/detail/1230_04/w1-1070se.htm
coming in at roughly double the desired center to center distance.
http://www.tb-speaker.com/detail/1230_04/w1-1070se.htm
coming in at roughly double the desired center to center distance.
Back from travel, went to SW Georgia, 2 1/2 days creek-side, lovely, peaceful... Green must have more variations than any other color. The trip back included a full-bow rainbow (partial double) and a lightning show in the last 40 miles.
I think Dave has picked up on the pedigree.
Pano has shown where they are used.
A ~6' CBT uses 70 of them...seventy...per side.
I think Dave has picked up on the pedigree.
Pano has shown where they are used.
A ~6' CBT uses 70 of them...seventy...per side.
I don't want to even consider what the straight line version that uses delay lines would take to develop!!! 😱
Not to mention (with my luck) after a bunch'a $$$$$ and a looooong build SWMBO would most likely say "I don't see what the fuss is all about" - They are to big - Can't go in my living room!! 🙄
Not to mention (with my luck) after a bunch'a $$$$$ and a looooong build SWMBO would most likely say "I don't see what the fuss is all about" - They are to big - Can't go in my living room!! 🙄
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Design & Build
- Parts
- Smallest tweeter available?