If you had any real evidence against Jack Bybee, I wish that you would present it, either publicly or privately. If not, you are just generating libel. Perhaps not actionable, like some, but corrosive just the same. I have showed you Bybee devices, even partially open, told you more than what I was supposted to, about them, and even offered to introduce you to Jack Bybee when you lived in this area. What is the problem then?
Texas, use Google to give you the melting temperatures of the other materials. They both are liquid above room temperature , but below the boiling point of water. That is why they were selected.
It was your own words, John, when you said that Bybee intentionally misleads people with regard to his Purifiers.
se
In your case, SY, let us put it down to 'prejudice' You know: 'Condemnation without examination, is prejudice' MY MOTTO.
Texas, this quantum resistor thing is the greatest mind blowing physics, for me, since the 2 slit experiment, that I was seriously exposed to in 1965. It just shows that things sometimes work differently below the surface than you might expect or predict. Jack Bybee appears to work in this world, not in the world of engineering in general, like I do. When we talk, we talk in terms of these sort of things, it is fascinating to me, that's for sure, but then I am more open, than some, to new stuff.
I spelled them out for your EIGHT YEARS AGO!
How did you address them? The same as you have been all these years since. In other words, you didn't. You just threw up your usual smokescreen:
You have no idea how the Bybee filters work or how they are constructed. And after all these years, you haven't learned to study higher physics.
Here's what I wrote you eight years ago. It holds just as true today.
Yes, John, go scurrying hiding behind your "higher physics" smoke screen like you always do. No enlightenment. Just obfuscation. In all these years you have yet to demonstrate that you've any understanding of physics beyond the high school level. All you've managed to do is utter a few buzzwords here and there, parrot a paragraph or two from Hummel, and handwave about other peoples' level of education.
Your bluff and bluster wore thin some time ago, John and you're more transparent than ever.
se
John, the Bybee Purifiers are NOT quantum point contacts and the paper has absolutely NOTHING to do with the Purifiers.
se
Please bring me up-to-date, SE. I forgot the SPECIFIC criticisms of the Bybee purifiers, that you and SY seem to hold dear to your hearts.
I have the same problem, myself, with tunnel diodes. I own test equipment that uses them, and I can demonstrate them on a curve tracer, but I don't really, really, know why they do what they do. Seems to violate the laws of physics, doesn't it? Yet, it is something I can hold in my hand.
I have the same problem, myself, with tunnel diodes. I own test equipment that uses them, and I can demonstrate them on a curve tracer, but I don't really, really, know why they do what they do. Seems to violate the laws of physics, doesn't it? Yet, it is something I can hold in my hand.
SY, Dr. Hummel told me that the quantum explanation of electron flow helped to clarify why sodium has a different resistivity than predicted by Drude theory. If you have a problem, why not take it up with him?
Here's just one:
In addition to being near-superconductive, Bybee Quantum Purifiers are electrically passive and stable in any circuit.
se
A few years ago, I had a professional colleague who was a PhD physicist. Our work had nothing to do with physics or electronics - we were environmental professionals. But frequently we would go have a beer and he would try to explain to me mind-blowing things that he knew about on the bleeding edge of technology and known laws of physics. I only understood about about 25% of what he was telling me. One thing he told me about several years ago was quantum computers, which now seem to be "relatively" common knowledge. He also told me about "entanglement" and referred me to some reading material on the subject. I have no idea how/why entanglement works, but the concept has been independantly proven by university researchers. When I combine these experiences with my own experiences related to nanomaterials, I am more open to the potential for things to work beyond my normal comprehension.
I don't own Bybees and have no affiliation with Mr. Bybee. Mr. Curl (or any other part of the electronics business whatsoever) and am not planning on buying any because I simply don't have that kinda cash available. But if I had the cash, I would try em out. Call me stupid if you want, it ain't the first time and it won't be the last.
I don't own Bybees and have no affiliation with Mr. Bybee. Mr. Curl (or any other part of the electronics business whatsoever) and am not planning on buying any because I simply don't have that kinda cash available. But if I had the cash, I would try em out. Call me stupid if you want, it ain't the first time and it won't be the last.
Last edited:
Not to mention claimed Second Law violations.
Here's the sad (to me) part. I strongly believe that John is a completely honest guy. And despite his public persona, he's a really nice guy as well. It just grates me to see him being so sorely used by a scam artist and to feel compelled to defend dishonesty out of loyalty to someone he thinks is his friend. That to me is a far worse moral failing on Bybee's part than the mere humbug of the ripoff devices that he sells.
Here's the sad (to me) part. I strongly believe that John is a completely honest guy. And despite his public persona, he's a really nice guy as well. It just grates me to see him being so sorely used by a scam artist and to feel compelled to defend dishonesty out of loyalty to someone he thinks is his friend. That to me is a far worse moral failing on Bybee's part than the mere humbug of the ripoff devices that he sells.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.