|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: izmir turkey
|
Hi All,
Most of the circuits I have seen here in this forum and elsewhere utilize a single transistor for the VAS. Mr.Self, describing his 'Blameless Amplifier', maintains that it is best to use a darlington connected pair for the VAS.I would like to hear your opinions on swapping this darlington configuration with a Sziklai pair. One downside I can think of is, in a darlington connection as in Mr. Self's amps, the input transistor of the darlington pair operates in an almost constant Vce because the collector is tied to the ground.In a CFP configuration, both transistors making up the VAS will see the rail-to-rail excursion, forcing the first transistor to be a high voltage type as well. Selim |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Lyon, France
|
Sziklai has advantages for voltage followers but the VAS is just a current amplifier, so using a darlington or a CFP is about the same.
View the input stage as a current source (it converts the error voltage into a current) if you have problems understanding this. If you don't use a current mirror in the input stage, it's a bit less clear, though... |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Animal farm
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think there is an advantage of using CFP in VAS and that is more linearity .
__________________
It's a fruitless endeavor to try and educate a fool that rejoices in ignorance
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Self shows 6 variations of the VAS, all with his preferred Cdom.
a+b) two single transistor versions. c+d) two same sex versions. e+f) two versions with complementary transistors.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
No, it is not a misquote. Andrew is very precise in his contributions.
It is a reference to both transistors being identical types, that is, both npn (fixed at the negative rail) or both pnp (fixed at the positive rail). Cheers, Hugh |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Next door
|
A VAS using CFP's :
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/francis....36_palouda.gif Simulation shows it is very linear : http://francis.audio.monsite.wanadoo.fr/page5.html (chapter "SIMULATION DU DEUXIEME ETAGE DE L'AMPLIFICATEUR") |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Thanks Sebastien. I have used this precise VAS configuration in one of my amp designs.
Make each stage as linear as possible, then apply feedback, not much at all in this case..... there is a LOT of degeneration in there. Output stage, another CFP, shows signs of very great design care. I assume it's Class AB, however, with some issues at switching. There is nothing new under the sun. Thank you for sharing this circuit, Sebastien, Cheers, Hugh |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: K-town
|
Hi
It depends on how you perceive the circuit. The best VAS I have ever built consists of a bipolar, constant power, differential bridge. If you look at the constant power part, it resembles a CFP that happens to be cascode.
__________________
All the trouble I've ever been in started out as fun...... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11387 seconds (80.65% PHP - 19.35% MySQL) with 10 queries |