|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Solid State Talk all about solid state amplification. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Hi there,
Can some one explain how this bias circuit works? Legend: PRE Drive Q3 & Q4 Output stage Q5 & Q6 Bias Diode QD1 Bias Transistor Q7 Stabistor pack DP1 Overload det Transistor Q8 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Does anyone know how the bias scheme avoids complete non switching of output transistors?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Hi,
does it matter if the non operation device passes near constant current or is actually switched off? A single ended ClassA amplifier never switches off it's output device. The device remains in control of the output current. If the output current nears or exceeds the bias current then the stage overloads/clips. Similarly if the output device passes zero current the amp is no longer in ClassA. A push-pull ClassA stage has an upper and lower pair of devices. Both these devices remain in control of the output current. If one or other of the devices drops out of control then the stage reverts to ClassAB operation to supply the extra current above the ~ 2times bias current. If one device passes a constant (low) current and the other device is passing more than double the bias current to the load then the stage is operating in ClassAB. It matters not that neither device has switched off. It is limited to ~twice bias current for ClassA operation.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
I was mistaken, I thought that Technics chip internals as shown is doing class-AB. Thought, the sabistor + resistors are stopping the cross over dist in Class-AB.
Anyway, thanks for your clarifications. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
there are a lot of designers and builders that disagree with me, notably Prof. Leach where he describes the operation of his drivers in LO Tim as staying in ClassA simply because he has arranged that they never switch off. I contend that he is wrong.
You have to make up your own mind. My "clarification" is not fact. It is my opinion.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
I appreciate it Andrew. But you must have some reasoning before taking any view.
I was looking for class-A performance but still was not ready to accept the inefficiency of it. However, I thought if the cross-over distortion, a drawback of proper class-B, can somehow be eliminated then it would be a good trade-off in between class-A and non-switching class-B. I thought technics chip was doing that. I really didn't want to start a philosophical debate about class conflicts and its subtleties. cheers |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
Its not really class a but it does help with crossover distortion, have a look at the krill amp thread, another inovative +new class a+ amp.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
Homemodder,
Going back to my early post, I would like to know how this x-over minimisation mechanism works. Krill amp utilise few diodes to achieve nonlinear relationship. Are those diodes not producing switching distortion? Atiq |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
Think of it this way, these schemes help because the outputs are kept at a bias level and never go through a point where the devices switches completly off, theres more to the theory but Im really bad at explaining these things, andrewt or andyc would be much better at this. Asked them nicely, Im sure they will help you out. There are some explanations in the krill amp thread and the thread connected with it, also read the theory behind the cambridge azur840 amp, theres a white paper on the azur range.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
D.Self's Cambridge work is very similar to the conversion of opamp output stages to single ended ClassA using a current source to one supply.
All this does is increase the level of low current ClassA available before the amp reverts to ClassAB for the higher current outputs. I wonder if the asymmetrical nature of this ClassA to ClassAB handover is audible? The opamps ClassA current is determined in conjunction with the load to never handover to ClassAB. Cambridge cannot achieve this trick with their power amp.
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New class A biasing (with non-switching class AB overflow) | Steven | Solid State | 34 | 24th March 2007 06:40 PM |
| low-biasing or high biasing in Class-AB amps | Workhorse | Solid State | 124 | 18th October 2005 04:45 AM |
| Op amp class A biasing. | pro | Solid State | 33 | 2nd December 2004 11:20 AM |
| Class A/B Biasing | bowdown | Solid State | 3 | 23rd September 2004 01:56 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.25705 seconds (84.37% PHP - 15.63% MySQL) with 11 queries |