diyAudio - rjm
Go Back   Home > Forums > Blogs

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Old

B-board Boxer Project : A Low Voltage Headphone Amplifier for 16 ohm Loads

Posted 7th July 2012 at 12:19 AM by rjm
Updated 29th September 2012 at 02:58 AM by rjm

I always seem to end up optimizing my headphone amplifier circuits for higher impedance headphones, this mostly happens because I own a pair of 300 ohm HD-600s and it is tedious to design for both the voltage requirements of high impedance headphones and the current requirements of low impedance headphones.

Not impossible, just, for the class-A designs I seem to be building recently, increasingly large, heavy, and impractical.

Complimentary transistor circuits, however, offer the opportunity to swap voltage for current at something close to the same design cost. They are therefore a practical topology for efficient class-A power delivery into low impedance headphones. As a design experiment, my aim is to discover how far I can leverage an ultra-low-voltage, unity gain circuit for compactness without sacrificing sound quality.

Ok. Back-of-the-envelope calculations:

A typical 16 ohm in-ear-headphone has a sensitivity of 100-105...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	B-board Boxer AA.png
Views:	2483
Size:	26.6 KB
ID:	730   Click image for larger version

Name:	B-board Boxer AA LTSPICE.png
Views:	1602
Size:	124.7 KB
ID:	732   Click image for larger version

Name:	B-board Boxer AA 0.5 sch.png
Views:	861
Size:	19.6 KB
ID:	735   Click image for larger version

Name:	B-board Boxer AA 0.5 brd.png
Views:	714
Size:	21.7 KB
ID:	736   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0083 800.jpg
Views:	283
Size:	134.3 KB
ID:	747  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0086 800.jpg
Views:	405
Size:	185.2 KB
ID:	748   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0075 800.jpg
Views:	234
Size:	155.1 KB
ID:	749   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0079 800.jpg
Views:	395
Size:	206.1 KB
ID:	750   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0114 800.jpg
Views:	346
Size:	207.7 KB
ID:	751   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0106 800.jpg
Views:	628
Size:	196.0 KB
ID:	752  

rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 2601 Comments 7 rjm is offline
Old

NwAvGuy odac 24/96 DAC review

Posted 23rd June 2012 at 07:02 AM by rjm
Updated 2nd July 2012 at 04:52 PM by rjm

I cased up my odac board (NwAvGuy via jtktam) in a small aluminum project box.

The DAC is a simple two-chip affair, with a Tenor TE7022L controller fronting the ESS ES9023 DAC and integrated line driver. A couple of voltage regulators, the clock oscillator, and an eeprom chip round out the principle component list.

I compared it with my Onkyo SE-200PCI sound card. This 24/192 (115dB S/N A-weighted, 0.003% THD 0dB 1kHz) PCI card sells for about $15,000 yen and is based on the VIA Envy24HT and Wolfson WM8740.

I'm listening to 16bit 44.1kHz .wav (CD rips), though VLC [sample rate converter set to sinc, best quality, resampling quality 8]. Windows 8 release preview [default format 24/192 (onkyo), 24/96 (odac)]. Line out though Oyaide PA-02TR interconnects to the Sapphire headphone amp, and Sennheiser HD-600s.

**

So, I was planning on writing up a big 'ol review with my impressions, but, well... there's not really a...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMGP3077 1280.jpg
Views:	1763
Size:	379.9 KB
ID:	712   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMGP3031 1280.jpg
Views:	2410
Size:	349.2 KB
ID:	713   Click image for larger version

Name:	se200pci-hyojun.jpg
Views:	4327
Size:	648.6 KB
ID:	720  
Attached Files
File Type: pdf ODAC-release.pdf (196.7 KB, 644 views)
File Type: zip Odac and Onkyo Comparison.zip (28.3 KB, 333 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 18634 Comments 20 rjm is offline
Old

modest base requirements for a line stage

Posted 22nd June 2012 at 06:44 AM by rjm
Updated 29th June 2012 at 05:38 AM by rjm

Copied from this post, for reference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RNMarsh
Here are my own modest base requirements for a line stage (similar for power amp):

1. Open loop BW of 40KHz or more (-3dB)... 20KHz min.
2. IM and THD of less than .001% at 1v rms into 30 ohms for any frequency between 20Hz and 20KHz.
3. No coupling caps on input or output or in feedback path.
4. No use of dc servo circuits to track and correct dc offset and drift.
5. No more than 6-8 transistors (excluding power supply).
6. S/N ref 1 volt rms and without weighting of at least -130dB (input can be shorted or terminated).
7. No significant harmonics above the 2nd and 3rd.
8. Closed loop gain between 12 and 20 dBv
9. Low Zout (less than a fraction of an Ohm at any audio freq).
10. Distortion not be changed by source Z.
11. Transistors should be low cost and not be exotic, hard to obtain, very expensive or no longer manufactured.

There might
...
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 712 Comments 1 rjm is offline
Old

The Double-Diamond Amplifier (DDA)

Posted 13th June 2012 at 06:09 AM by rjm
Updated 16th June 2012 at 02:57 PM by rjm

This isn't my first attempt. It's been on my mind for a while: how to coax a diamond buffer into giving voltage gain, without resorting to fronting it with a op amp.

After reading a particularly gregarious thread over in the headphone forum, I'm more and more stoked on giving this a real shot.

Despite the (catchy) name I'm thinking pre-amplifier rather than amplifier applications.

update: I have have a quick and dirty sim up and running in ltspice. Curiously, the output distortion is 15 dB lower when the buffer runs open loop than when it is included inside the feedback loop. Intrigued. Currently under investigation.

update: refined the sim slightly, achieved -85 dB distortion levels at 0 dB / 1 kHz / 600 ohms running the output buffer open loop. Bandwidth is just under 1 MHz, adjusted by changing the feedback resistance. As before, performance sims out notably worse with the buffer
inside the feedback loop.
...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DDA mission patch.png
Views:	323
Size:	54.5 KB
ID:	704   Click image for larger version

Name:	DDA 0.6 FFT.png
Views:	1903
Size:	115.5 KB
ID:	709  
Attached Files
File Type: zip current feedback prototype 6 LTSPICE file.zip (1.4 KB, 172 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1809 Comments 2 rjm is offline
Old

Project "Originality" Headphone Amplifier by Tao Kurohane

Posted 11th June 2012 at 12:35 PM by rjm
Updated 11th June 2012 at 11:32 PM by rjm

http://kstlab.web.fc2.com/pro003.html

It is certainly a little bit different. One might be tempted to say "gilding the lily", but come on, headphone amplifiers are just the right place for these indulgences.

Building your own long tailed pair (LTP) to bolt in front of an IC op amp has fallen out of favor in recent years. I must admit I couldn't see the point then, and still don't.

I've seen a number of headphone amp circuits with 3 paralleled pairs of output devices. I wonder if there any real advantage over simply using one pair at 3x the current, perhaps with slightly larger transistors?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	originality.png
Views:	7196
Size:	76.2 KB
ID:	700  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 2679 Comments 1 rjm is offline
Old

Bypassing, Goldilocks, and the Sound of Nothing

Posted 31st May 2012 at 06:28 PM by rjm
Updated 1st June 2012 at 11:53 PM by rjm

Douglas Self writes,
Quote:
The 5532 and 5534 type op-amps require adequate supply decoupling if they are to remain stable, otherwise they appear to be subject to some sort of internal oscillation that degrades linearity without being visible on a normal oscilloscope. The essential requirement is that the positive and negative rails should be decoupled with a 100 nF capacitor between them, at a distance of not more than a few millimeters from the op-amp; normally one such capacitor is fitted per package as close to it as possible.
He's someone who should know. Anyway, it doesn't take much digging on the internet to confirm beyond reasonable doubt that bypass caps should be as close to the op amp power pins as possible. So thinking about my previous experiments with bypassing the Sapphire, by adding bypass caps around the transistors I also effectively also added a bypass for the op amp, but a rather poor one as the power-pin-to-power-pin round trip loop distance is probably 10...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1366 1280 hack.jpg
Views:	710
Size:	313.9 KB
ID:	696   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-sapphire-14s1-brd-bypass.png
Views:	1625
Size:	40.6 KB
ID:	697  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1939 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Ceramic capacitors : who knew?

Posted 12th May 2012 at 01:15 AM by rjm
Updated 28th May 2012 at 11:51 PM by rjm

This I have been experimenting - call it a hunch - on the effects of bypassing electrolytic capcitors (Nichicon FW and KW) with 0.1 uF TDK ceramics (Mouser 810-FK28X7S2A104K) with the diamond buffer circuit used in both my B-board preamp and Sapphire headphone amplifier.

This being a mod, I had to solder the caps to the underside of the boards, attached to the leads of the Nichicon 100uF electrolyic capacitors.

I used four ceramics per channel, one per active device in the diamond buffer if you like.

I did several other changes on the B-board at the same time, so it wasn't obvious until I modded the Sapphire in the same way what was the result of the bypassing. Anyway, with both the improvement was immediate and dramatic: any sense of "transistor-like" treble glare is completely quenched. The whole top end takes a step backwards, not in extension, but in prominence.

Less audiophile detail, more swinging mojo.

Update...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	810-FK28X7S2A104K.jpg
Views:	948
Size:	13.2 KB
ID:	682   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1368 1280.jpg
Views:	663
Size:	361.7 KB
ID:	683   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1366 1280.jpg
Views:	491
Size:	288.6 KB
ID:	684   Click image for larger version

Name:	b-board bypass.png
Views:	628
Size:	24.7 KB
ID:	691   Click image for larger version

Name:	b-board GZ 10e board bypass.png
Views:	663
Size:	26.0 KB
ID:	692  

Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-sapphire-14s1-brd-bypass.png
Views:	1238
Size:	37.8 KB
ID:	694  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 2332 Comments 1 rjm is offline
Old

Stepped Attenuator

Posted 8th May 2012 at 12:20 AM by rjm
Updated 8th May 2012 at 12:24 AM by rjm

I bought a stepped attenuator (actually, two of them) from ebay seller hanshare-electronics. As always with eBay, I was a little worried about what would show up.

I'm happy to report that this is a nice job. The included resistors are clearly labelled, and the documentation, while spartan, is sufficient.

The only negative is the rotary switch is a bit "clicky". Better quality units I've seen are more damped.

On the positive side, though, the resistor values are very elegantly selected, to give a smooth response of about 4 dB per step from -60 to -40 dB, and 2 dB per step from -40 to -3 dB. Having been-there, done-that, I can say that I'd happily pay the asking price to get those resistors sourced and sorted for me. Next time, I'd also pay to get it assembled. Soldering was more painful than I imagined it would be, and the pre-assembled units much neater-looking than what mine ended up as.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	takman50k.png
Views:	597
Size:	34.6 KB
ID:	680   Click image for larger version

Name:	takman.jpg
Views:	1839
Size:	144.3 KB
ID:	681  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1947 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

RJM B-board vs. 47 Labs 0247

Posted 5th May 2012 at 12:29 PM by rjm
Updated 6th May 2012 at 06:16 AM by rjm

B-board vs. 0247.

Comparison of the noise baselines, measured at the circuit output using a NI USB-6215 DAQ. Unloaded for the preamps, and with a 6 ohm load for the 0347 amplifier.
  • B-board: -139 [300Hz-100kHz] 0 dB gain (-139 - 0 = -139 dB, 110 nV sqrtHz input referred). The actual B-board output noise is below this measurement threshold.
  • 0247: -124 dB [300Hz-100kHz] 14 dB gain (-124 - 14 = -139 dB, 110 nV sqrtHz input referred).
  • 0347: -109 dB [300Hz-100kHz] 31 dB gain (-109 - 31 = -140 dB, 100 nV sqrtHz input referred).

See the attached plot for the FFT data. Note the peak at 28 Hz is an artifact of the measurement apparatus.

By way of comparison, a typical audio opamp has an input referred voltage noise figure of 3-8 nV sqrtHz (-170 ~ -160 dB) and can be expected to return this datasheet specification in most well-designed circuits. In other words the output noise is going to be about -160 dB + the circuit gain.

The 0247...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	compiled FFT.png
Views:	602
Size:	60.7 KB
ID:	675   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4078 1280.jpg
Views:	1070
Size:	367.6 KB
ID:	676   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0938 1280.jpg
Views:	1627
Size:	375.4 KB
ID:	677  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1441 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Flight of the Pheonix

Posted 26th April 2012 at 08:34 AM by rjm
Updated 4th May 2012 at 02:30 PM by rjm

Nor the remake, the original. Good film. Story shakes out something like "Twelve Angry Men in the desert": Put together a small, random group of people and pressure them to complete a task. In the case of "The Flight of the Pheonix" this is to make an airworthy plane (this one) from the crashed remains of another (this one).

So. We start with my old red Gainclone case, and a pair of these buffer boards , and a Takman resistor, 24 position stepped attenuator from eBay, unassembled, and start working to transform something old into something new.

Here's my LM3875 gainclone. Served me well, but it is time to bid adieu! (at least to the guts):
Click the image to open in full size.

Opened up, we see the circuit board, such that it is, and my home-built 11 position attenuator:
Click the image to open in full size....
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4007 1280.jpg
Views:	153
Size:	236.8 KB
ID:	651   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4009 1280.jpg
Views:	334
Size:	301.2 KB
ID:	652   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4023 1280.jpg
Views:	249
Size:	291.4 KB
ID:	653   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4073 1280.jpg
Views:	234
Size:	375.5 KB
ID:	663   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4075 1280.jpg
Views:	117
Size:	309.4 KB
ID:	664  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4078 1280.jpg
Views:	217
Size:	367.6 KB
ID:	665   Click image for larger version

Name:	B-board 10e FFT.png
Views:	211
Size:	35.9 KB
ID:	670  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 799 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Hide this!Advertise here!

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2015 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2