diyAudio - rjm
Go Back   Home > Forums > Blogs

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Old

Project "Originality" Headphone Amplifier by Tao Kurohane

Posted 11th June 2012 at 12:35 PM by rjm
Updated 11th June 2012 at 11:32 PM by rjm

http://kstlab.web.fc2.com/pro003.html

It is certainly a little bit different. One might be tempted to say "gilding the lily", but come on, headphone amplifiers are just the right place for these indulgences.

Building your own long tailed pair (LTP) to bolt in front of an IC op amp has fallen out of favor in recent years. I must admit I couldn't see the point then, and still don't.

I've seen a number of headphone amp circuits with 3 paralleled pairs of output devices. I wonder if there any real advantage over simply using one pair at 3x the current, perhaps with slightly larger transistors?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	originality.png
Views:	4716
Size:	76.2 KB
ID:	700  
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 2036 Comments 1 rjm is offline
Old

Bypassing, Goldilocks, and the Sound of Nothing

Posted 31st May 2012 at 06:28 PM by rjm
Updated 1st June 2012 at 11:53 PM by rjm

Douglas Self writes,
Quote:
The 5532 and 5534 type op-amps require adequate supply decoupling if they are to remain stable, otherwise they appear to be subject to some sort of internal oscillation that degrades linearity without being visible on a normal oscilloscope. The essential requirement is that the positive and negative rails should be decoupled with a 100 nF capacitor between them, at a distance of not more than a few millimeters from the op-amp; normally one such capacitor is fitted per package as close to it as possible.
He's someone who should know. Anyway, it doesn't take much digging on the internet to confirm beyond reasonable doubt that bypass caps should be as close to the op amp power pins as possible. So thinking about my previous experiments with bypassing the Sapphire, by adding bypass caps around the transistors I also effectively also added a bypass for the op amp, but a rather poor one as the power-pin-to-power-pin round trip loop distance is probably 10...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1366 1280 hack.jpg
Views:	573
Size:	313.9 KB
ID:	696   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-sapphire-14s1-brd-bypass.png
Views:	1020
Size:	40.6 KB
ID:	697  
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1334 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Ceramic capacitors : who knew?

Posted 12th May 2012 at 01:15 AM by rjm
Updated 28th May 2012 at 11:51 PM by rjm

This I have been experimenting - call it a hunch - on the effects of bypassing electrolytic capcitors (Nichicon FW and KW) with 0.1 uF TDK ceramics (Mouser 810-FK28X7S2A104K) with the diamond buffer circuit used in both my B-board preamp and Sapphire headphone amplifier.

This being a mod, I had to solder the caps to the underside of the boards, attached to the leads of the Nichicon 100uF electrolyic capacitors.

I used four ceramics per channel, one per active device in the diamond buffer if you like.

I did several other changes on the B-board at the same time, so it wasn't obvious until I modded the Sapphire in the same way what was the result of the bypassing. Anyway, with both the improvement was immediate and dramatic: any sense of "transistor-like" treble glare is completely quenched. The whole top end takes a step backwards, not in extension, but in prominence.

Less audiophile detail, more swinging mojo.

Update...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	810-FK28X7S2A104K.jpg
Views:	570
Size:	13.2 KB
ID:	682   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1368 1280.jpg
Views:	528
Size:	361.7 KB
ID:	683   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_1366 1280.jpg
Views:	411
Size:	288.6 KB
ID:	684   Click image for larger version

Name:	b-board bypass.png
Views:	495
Size:	24.7 KB
ID:	691   Click image for larger version

Name:	b-board GZ 10e board bypass.png
Views:	410
Size:	26.0 KB
ID:	692  

Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-sapphire-14s1-brd-bypass.png
Views:	766
Size:	37.8 KB
ID:	694  
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1928 Comments 1 rjm is offline
Old

Stepped Attenuator

Posted 8th May 2012 at 12:20 AM by rjm
Updated 8th May 2012 at 12:24 AM by rjm

I bought a stepped attenuator (actually, two of them) from ebay seller hanshare-electronics. As always with eBay, I was a little worried about what would show up.

I'm happy to report that this is a nice job. The included resistors are clearly labelled, and the documentation, while spartan, is sufficient.

The only negative is the rotary switch is a bit "clicky". Better quality units I've seen are more damped.

On the positive side, though, the resistor values are very elegantly selected, to give a smooth response of about 4 dB per step from -60 to -40 dB, and 2 dB per step from -40 to -3 dB. Having been-there, done-that, I can say that I'd happily pay the asking price to get those resistors sourced and sorted for me. Next time, I'd also pay to get it assembled. Soldering was more painful than I imagined it would be, and the pre-assembled units much neater-looking than what mine ended up as.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	takman50k.png
Views:	472
Size:	34.6 KB
ID:	680   Click image for larger version

Name:	takman.jpg
Views:	1286
Size:	144.3 KB
ID:	681  
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1582 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

RJM B-board vs. 47 Labs 0247

Posted 5th May 2012 at 12:29 PM by rjm
Updated 6th May 2012 at 06:16 AM by rjm

B-board vs. 0247.

Comparison of the noise baselines, measured at the circuit output using a NI USB-6215 DAQ. Unloaded for the preamps, and with a 6 ohm load for the 0347 amplifier.
  • B-board: -139 [300Hz-100kHz] 0 dB gain (-139 - 0 = -139 dB, 110 nV sqrtHz input referred). The actual B-board output noise is below this measurement threshold.
  • 0247: -124 dB [300Hz-100kHz] 14 dB gain (-124 - 14 = -139 dB, 110 nV sqrtHz input referred).
  • 0347: -109 dB [300Hz-100kHz] 31 dB gain (-109 - 31 = -140 dB, 100 nV sqrtHz input referred).

See the attached plot for the FFT data. Note the peak at 28 Hz is an artifact of the measurement apparatus.

By way of comparison, a typical audio opamp has an input referred voltage noise figure of 3-8 nV sqrtHz (-170 ~ -160 dB) and can be expected to return this datasheet specification in most well-designed circuits. In other words the output noise is going to be about -160 dB + the circuit gain.

The 0247...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	compiled FFT.png
Views:	494
Size:	60.7 KB
ID:	675   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4078 1280.jpg
Views:	801
Size:	367.6 KB
ID:	676   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_0938 1280.jpg
Views:	1225
Size:	375.4 KB
ID:	677  
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1248 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Flight of the Pheonix

Posted 26th April 2012 at 08:34 AM by rjm
Updated 4th May 2012 at 02:30 PM by rjm

Nor the remake, the original. Good film. Story shakes out something like "Twelve Angry Men in the desert": Put together a small, random group of people and pressure them to complete a task. In the case of "The Flight of the Pheonix" this is to make an airworthy plane (this one) from the crashed remains of another (this one).

So. We start with my old red Gainclone case, and a pair of these buffer boards , and a Takman resistor, 24 position stepped attenuator from eBay, unassembled, and start working to transform something old into something new.

Here's my LM3875 gainclone. Served me well, but it is time to bid adieu! (at least to the guts):
Click the image to open in full size.

Opened up, we see the circuit board, such that it is, and my home-built 11 position attenuator:
Click the image to open in full size....
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4007 1280.jpg
Views:	102
Size:	236.8 KB
ID:	651   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4009 1280.jpg
Views:	272
Size:	301.2 KB
ID:	652   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4023 1280.jpg
Views:	184
Size:	291.4 KB
ID:	653   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4073 1280.jpg
Views:	202
Size:	375.5 KB
ID:	663   Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4075 1280.jpg
Views:	89
Size:	309.4 KB
ID:	664  

Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_4078 1280.jpg
Views:	171
Size:	367.6 KB
ID:	665   Click image for larger version

Name:	B-board 10e FFT.png
Views:	161
Size:	35.9 KB
ID:	670  
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 677 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Stereo VSPS rev 50c

Posted 25th April 2012 at 12:48 AM by rjm

The original stereo VSPS project is now quite mature. I did a couple of minor tweaks on the last re-spin of the layout, removing the pads for the old Black Gate coupling caps (long gone), adding thermal isolation, and making room for a pair of optional ceramic bypass caps next to the op amp.

The new boards are matt black. Quite cool. I have a small stack if you need any.

All the info you need to build one is attached.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	DSC_3986 1280.jpg
Views:	287
Size:	235.5 KB
ID:	644   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-vsps-50c.png
Views:	338
Size:	13.3 KB
ID:	645   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-vsps-50c-brd.png
Views:	487
Size:	10.2 KB
ID:	646   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-vsps-50c-sch.png
Views:	594
Size:	24.3 KB
ID:	647  
Attached Files
File Type: zip pcb-vsps50c.zip (83.0 KB, 198 views)
File Type: zip pcb-vsps50c-bom.zip (86.2 KB, 165 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1419 Comments 2 rjm is offline
Old

X-reg Evaluation Boards

Posted 7th April 2012 at 12:15 AM by rjm
Updated 9th April 2012 at 03:37 AM by rjm

Once in a while I get emails asking after the X-reg evaluation boards. These are handy little 5x8 cm test boards for the X-reg voltage regulator - or they would be, if I had ever bothered to get a set made.

Since the circuit is built into the VSPS300 and Phonoclone 3, it wasn't really a big priority.

Anyhow, yesterday I re-drew the evaluation boards and I'll be getting a batch made in the near future, along with some of the stereo VSPS that people were also asking after recently. They won't exactly fly off the shelves, but I started to feel bad for those few people who actually wanted them.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-xreg-15c-brd.png
Views:	400
Size:	10.3 KB
ID:	640   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-xreg-15c.png
Views:	361
Size:	11.0 KB
ID:	641   Click image for larger version

Name:	pcb-xreg-15c-sch.png
Views:	578
Size:	22.2 KB
ID:	642  
Attached Files
File Type: zip pcb-xreg.zip (129.5 KB, 200 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1027 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Headphone Amplifier Gain

Posted 2nd April 2012 at 08:45 AM by rjm
Updated 2nd April 2012 at 11:43 AM by rjm

I posted this earlier today, but I think it deserves to be put in the blog - if nothing else so I can find it again next time ... and there always seems to be a next time when it comes to calculating headphone amplifier gains.

Starting at the beginning, the encoded data on a CD goes from 0 to 1 in 2^16 steps, but in a typical CD player or soundcard, the DAC output is -2.8 V to 2.8 V or 2 V rms or 6 dB. Many sources, such as phono stages and portable audio, are lower, perhaps as low as 250 mV.

How loud the sound is depends on the source signal amplitude, the position of the volume control, the circuit gain, and the impedance and sensitivity of the headphones.

As a practical matter, most people would want the volume control at the 9-10 o'clock position for "normal" listening.

For standard "line level" source, the gain required to keep the volume control at a 9-10 o'clock varies depending on the impedance...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	headphone sensitivity.png
Views:	375
Size:	25.9 KB
ID:	635  
Attached Files
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 2550 Comments 2 rjm is offline
Old

Pimp My Board Contest Results

Posted 31st March 2012 at 12:20 PM by rjm
Updated 31st March 2012 at 12:28 PM by rjm

I did get a couple of responses to my invitation. Well, two, actually.

So congratulations! Free boards will be heading your way in about a month, and I'll throw in most if not all the parts, too.

First was simonov's entry. He's clearly done this several times before. His confident layout ticks all the right buttons: ground plane (check), thermal isolation (check), clean, geometric layout (check). One jumper required, but that's a very minor offence.

Click the image to open in full size.

While I allowed modifications of the circuit, simonov went and redesigned pretty much the whole thing. CCS replaces the source resistor, current limiter and capacitance multiplier blocks added. The BOM was starting to spiral, and no longer uses my standard parts set so I'd have difficulty supplying kits based on his design. His modifications, although certainly improvements, ended up counting against him....
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 919 Comments 2 rjm is offline
Hide this!Advertise here!

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:46 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2