diyAudio - rjm
Go Back   Home > Forums > Blogs

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Old

A catalog of headphone amplifier circuits.

Posted 19th May 2013 at 10:45 AM by rjm
Updated 21st May 2013 at 12:12 AM by rjm

Lots of circuits out there, but most are variations of a small set of archetypes. Let's see if I can put together a list:

1. Dedicated headphone amplifier IC. e.g.(lme49860)

2. Battery powered, single stage, generic audio op amp. The ever-popular mint tin cmoy.

3. Op amp + buffer (complementary transistor pair, diamond buffer, unity gain op amp, etc, in either integrated or discrete package.)
a. closed loop connection or "compound amplifier" configuration as developed by Walt Jung.
b. open loop, two stage circuit, e.g. nwavguy o2 and my sapphire amp.

4. simple 2 or 3 transistor "introduction to electronics"-style amplifier

5. The "little big amp", a scaled back version of a transistor or vacuum tube power amplifier design. (Zen, DoZ, transformer coupled SET amps)

6. The power follower. Single-ended MOSFET or BJT, with or without CCS load, voltage...
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 1038 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Which soldering station should I buy?

Posted 17th May 2013 at 07:47 AM by rjm
Updated 20th May 2013 at 05:20 AM by rjm

Thinking I should get a new soldering station.

I've had my eye on a Weller station for the longest time, but put off getting one for one reason or another.

Looking at the selection, I think the choice comes down to the two following models, or, indeed the equivalent made by another company:

WTCPT (link)

WES51 (link)

The main difference is in the WTCPT the tip temperature is fixed, but rigorously controlled, while the WES51 has user adjustable power but the tip temperature is left unregulated.

I'm leaning towards the WES51 as being slightly more in line with my own style of work: I'm more likely to want higher or lower temperatures depending on the job at hand than I am to require "700F" exactly.

Update 1.

A little concerned the WES51 is only 50W max. That's less than the maximum I use now for the tough stuff.

Hakko has two models in the price...
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 749 Comments 6 rjm is offline
Old

Audacity sucks.

Posted 9th May 2013 at 02:50 PM by rjm
Updated 10th May 2013 at 03:35 AM by rjm

Under windows at least, Audacity is unable to record audio at bitrates above 16 bit.

It will seem to, all right, but the data is quantized at 16 bit (30 microvolt LSB), regardless of the settings chosen.

The attached images show the same source, the first recording is made in Audacity, supposedly 24 bit, but actually only 16 bit, while the second is recorded with a program than actually supports 24 bit, exported, and imported into Audacity. The data is amplified +70dB in both cases to make the difference visible.

Audacity will happily manipulate and save high bit rate data, but as a result of licensing restrictions and on account of it being freeware, it does not support the actual recording of this data.

***

Any internet search will confirm that the Windows version of Audacity is limited to 16 bit recording. And yes, it's more of a limitation of Windows than it is of Audacity. My irritation, however, is chiefly with Audacity...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	16bitLSB.png
Views:	166
Size:	102.3 KB
ID:	987   Click image for larger version

Name:	24bitLSB.png
Views:	195
Size:	55.0 KB
ID:	988  
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 657 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

J-Mo Mk. II vs. Szekeres, distortion comparison

Posted 3rd May 2013 at 08:24 AM by rjm
Updated 5th May 2013 at 11:52 PM by rjm

Two headphone amplifiers sharing the same basic MOSFET source follower output stage.

When the source current and source resistance are optimized for the given headphone load and similar maximum output power (~50 mW at 1% THD), the distortion pattern vs. output power is remarkably similar.

One plot below is simulation, the other measurements. The J-Mo 2 simulation closely matched the actual measurements, it wasn't worth my while to generate a full simulated data set when I already had the measurements on hand. No reason to suspect that the Szekeres sim is inaccurate, either.

The take home message is the distortion characteristic of a MOSFET follower is what it is, and unavoidable. Take it or leave it, as it were. However - and this is key - if you don't optimize the stage for the headphone impedance, the distortion for a given output power will increase significantly.

As an aside: Greg did his homework with the original circuit....
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	szekeres THD sim.png
Views:	265
Size:	27.4 KB
ID:	980   Click image for larger version

Name:	jmo2 thd sim.png
Views:	312
Size:	32.1 KB
ID:	981   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMGP6429 1280.jpg
Views:	320
Size:	386.1 KB
ID:	982   Click image for larger version

Name:	IMGP6436 1280.jpg
Views:	408
Size:	408.4 KB
ID:	983  
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 883 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Szekeres Headphone Driver, distortion simulation

Posted 3rd May 2013 at 08:11 AM by rjm
Updated 3rd May 2013 at 08:15 AM by rjm

I've always enjoyed the sound of the Greg Szekeres' Headphone Driver (buffer) and derivatives sharing the MOSFET source follower output stage.

I've often wondered however, whether it's distinctive sound is because it is unusually free from noise and artifacts, or because its unusually prone to heavy second harmonic distortion.

It's not hard to set this up in LTSpice, but I haven't seen it done before. So, for your education and enlightenment, I present the harmonic distortion vs. output power data for the original "classic" circuit as uploaded to Headwize all those years ago. The LTSpice asc file is also included I you want to play along. The harmonic data is generated by hand, reading the FFT peaks for 10 or so different input voltages.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	szekeres sim circuit.png
Views:	356
Size:	50.6 KB
ID:	976   Click image for larger version

Name:	szekeres THD sim 2.png
Views:	262
Size:	28.2 KB
ID:	978   Click image for larger version

Name:	szeke2.gif
Views:	764
Size:	6.0 KB
ID:	979  
Attached Files
File Type: asc Szekeres.asc (2.1 KB, 200 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Posted in The Lab
Views 960 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Discrete transistor line amplifier stage mod 1

Posted 19th April 2013 at 10:24 PM by rjm
Updated 20th April 2013 at 05:04 AM by rjm

Changed the collector load on the voltage amplifier stage to a current source (Q3), as per the Marantz SR2285B circuit.

Also increased the resistance of the feedback connection, R6+R8, there seemed to be no obvious advantage in making it much smaller than the typical load (>10k). The compensation capacitor C2 is increased to match, to flatten the HF response.

The circuit can drive light loads to +20 dB. Of course that's not much of a challenge for this general class of circuit.

I'm a bit stumped as to what the next logical step is from here. Seems to me to depend on what you actually want the circuit to do.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	RJM discrete mod1.png
Views:	875
Size:	59.2 KB
ID:	963  
Attached Files
File Type: asc RJM discrete mod1.asc (3.5 KB, 135 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Posted in The Lab
Views 848 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

Discrete transistor line amplifier stage

Posted 16th April 2013 at 01:18 AM by rjm
Updated 16th April 2013 at 12:23 PM by rjm

Over the last couple of years most of my interest in audio has been with transistors. I've been slowly teaching myself to read and understand the circuits.

Circuits like this one for example. Not hard, but still a bit too complicated for me to understand without the helpful wikipedia markup attached.

Instead I've looked at primarily at the schematics I have for discrete audio preamplfiers, 1970's vintage typically. Based on what I've learnt so far, I've done up a "test mule" in LTSPICE, shown below.

It's not a circuit you should build. It's for pedagogical purposes, though it does actually work reasonably well - in simulation anyway. Its just a simple starting point to observe how the different parts interact under simulation.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	RJM discrete.png
Views:	549
Size:	93.4 KB
ID:	959  
Attached Files
File Type: asc RJM discrete.asc (3.2 KB, 138 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Posted in The Lab
Views 861 Comments 0 rjm is offline
Old

A poll. Basic electronics and DIY audio.

Posted 2nd April 2013 at 01:46 AM by rjm
Updated 4th May 2013 at 10:54 PM by rjm

It came up at the help desk, but I want to put this before diyaudio.com members generally:

I feel strongly that people who build audio equipment as a hobby should take it upon themselves to obtain a basic understanding of both the practical and theoretical aspects of electronics. Take a trip to the library and read through the first couple of chapters of electronics textbooks, that kind of thing.

It's more than just the safety aspect, I think of it as a basic necessity...

So, how many people here are familiar with the following statement?

The impedance of a capacitor is -j/([omega]C)

Familiar as dirt? Never heard of it before?
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Views 649 Comments 2 rjm is offline
Old

Preamps are not line level.

Posted 1st April 2013 at 04:57 AM by rjm

If you don't think about it too hard, you'd imagine that the signals in the phono stage would be smaller than the signals in the line level preamplifier stage that follows it. Or that the signals in the DAC/CD player would be about the same level or slightly lower than the signal in the preamplifier.

As usual, the answer is "it depends". It depends on the sensitivity of your speakers, how loud you are listening, and the voltage gain of the amplifier. It also depends on whether we are talking about a MM phono stage or low output MC.

My point is simply this: the volume control is an attenuator, and at the typical "9 o'clock" position the input signal is reduced in magnitude by about 35 dB.

That cuts it back down to being comparable to the output of a moving magnet cart, and much, much smaller than anything found in a DAC stage.

It means you absolutely, definitely, positively must spend as much effort and care...
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Posted in The Lab
Views 626 Comments 4 rjm is offline
Old

Marantz SR2285B Receiver : Phono Stage Model Response

Posted 19th March 2013 at 06:02 AM by rjm
Updated 20th March 2013 at 01:54 AM by rjm

Mid-range 1970's stereo receiver.

I was curious to find out a) what the phono circuit was, and b) how tight the RIAA response might have been.

The answer is "four transistors" and "pretty damn good", respectively.

We are impressed. These Japanese engineers knew a thing or two. I would like to see some of these old circuits resurrected as discrete phono stages with modern components to see just what they are capable of.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Marantz SR2285B phono.png
Views:	970
Size:	39.9 KB
ID:	917   Click image for larger version

Name:	Marantz SR2285B ps.png
Views:	1626
Size:	52.6 KB
ID:	918   Click image for larger version

Name:	Marantz SR2285B sim2.png
Views:	1079
Size:	17.9 KB
ID:	919   Click image for larger version

Name:	simluated results.png
Views:	462
Size:	32.8 KB
ID:	920  
Attached Files
File Type: zip Marantz LTSPICE.zip (1.5 KB, 107 views)
rjm's Avatar
rjm
diyAudio Member
Posted in The Lab
Views 1528 Comments 2 rjm is offline
Hide this!Advertise here!

New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:20 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2015 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2