The 'Interface' - Steve Eddy?

[Steve Eddy]

Re: Why These Claims Steve?

These claims are implied benefits, as are the statements about WBT, Caddock, Wima and Kimber silver wire.

The claims are simply what the thing's made of. The only implication is that the choices I made satisfied me.

If these have no sonic benefit why mention them, and why not use just any type of wire, components or connectors ?.

I used what I used because of what I'd tried, that's what worked best for me subjectively.

se

 

[mrfeedback]

Gilding The Lily..........

"The InterFace offers other benefits as well. Despite it being a single-ended device, its common-mode noise rejection performance is actually far superior to that of active balanced interfaces under real-world conditions (100dB for the InterFace versus 30-50dB for typical active balanced interfaces). The InterFace allows you to retain the simplicity of the single-ended interface while giving you better common-mode performance than active balanced interfaces! "
Without statements of test conditions (signal frequency, source impedences) this is patently untrue, entirely misleading and false advertising.

Eric.

 

[mrfeedback]

Steve The Subjective ??????

I used what I used because of what I'd tried, that's what worked best for me subjectively.

se

Ok, so what subjective differences did you find with different components, wires, isolation etc ?.

Eric.

 

[fdegrove]

Hi,

Without statements of test conditions (signal frequency, source impedences) this is patently untrue, entirely misleading and false advertising.

Cesar: Slisse, can I ask you something?
Slisse: Yes, go ahead, Cesar...
Cesar: Do you know why bananas aren't straight?
Slisse: Do YOU know why?
Cesar: Errr...Yes.
Slisse: So, why do you ask?

Cheers,

 

[Steve Eddy]

Re: Gilding The Lily..........

Without statements of test conditions (signal frequency, source impedences) this is patently untrue, entirely misleading and false advertising.

How does lack of statements of test conditions make something "patently untrue, entirely misleading and false advertising"?

se

 

[Steve Eddy]

Re: Steve The Subjective ??????

Ok, so what subjective differences did you find with different components, wires, isolation etc ?.

What has this to do with any of the claims made on the website?

se

 

[mrfeedback]

Re: Re: Gilding The Lily..........

How does lack of statements of test conditions make something "patently untrue, entirely misleading and false advertising"?

se

100dB for the InterFace ....... as a statement is not true, and therefore counts as deliberately false and misleading advertising.

Eric.

 

[mrfeedback]

Re: Re: Steve The Subjective ??????

Originally posted by Steve Eddy
What has this to do with any of the claims made on the website?
You claim subjective satisfaction a few posts above.
I am asking you to elaborate on what subjective differences you encountered when specifying/developing 'The Interface'.

Eric.

 

[faustian bargin]

the whole thing about subjectivity is, no explanation is really necessary, beyond "i think it's better". and as any good subjectivist knows, there is no onus of proof, nor any onus of elaboration.

 

[fdegrove]

Hi,

Doubtful claims:

Cheers,

 

[fdegrove]

Hi,

If YOU were to defend any of the claims in the above picture, how would YOU go about it?

Good luck,

 

[mrfeedback]

False Claims = Dishonest Claims = Charlatanry

Hi Frank,
Who is 'YOU' ?.
If you mean SE, then he has a difficult (impossible) job indeed to defend these claims of his (or those of his ghost writer).
Steve, you have also made statements here regarding subjectives, so why not elaborate on your subjective findings ?.

Eric.

 

[fdegrove]

Hi,

Who is 'YOU' ?.

Just about anyone. Period.

Cheers,

 

[mrfeedback]

the whole thing about subjectivity is, no explanation is really necessary, beyond "i think it's better". and as any good subjectivist knows, there is no onus of proof, nor any onus of elaboration.

Explanations of why "i think it's better" are useful to communicate impressions of sonic differences.

Eric.

 

[Steve Eddy]

Re: Re: Re: Gilding The Lily..........

100dB for the InterFace ....... as a statement is not true, and therefore counts as deliberately false and misleading advertising.

How is it not true?

se

 

[Steve Eddy]

Re: Re: Re: Steve The Subjective ??????

You claim subjective satisfaction a few posts above.
I am asking you to elaborate on what subjective differences you encountered when specifying/developing 'The Interface'.

I don't feel like elaborating.

se

 

[mrfeedback]

Re: Re: Re: Re: Gilding The Lily..........

How is it not true?

se

Your site says so.

Eric.

 

[Steve Eddy]

the whole thing about subjectivity is, no explanation is really necessary, beyond "i think it's better". and as any good subjectivist knows, there is no onus of proof, nor any onus of elaboration.

Quite so. And since I can't possibly tell anyone else to any degree of certainty what THEIR particular subjective experiences might be, I rather find it a waste of my time to elaborate on my particular subjective experiences.

Besides, I don't listen in the fly speck way that most others seem to do. I judge things on a more holistic, intuitive level so I wouldn't be able to elaborate about those fly speck details even if I cared to elaborate.

se

 

[fdegrove]

Hi,

How is it not true?

Because it's conditional and therefore not TRUE as such.

I don't feel like elaborating.

I've got a headache...my time of the month or I just don't know?

Bottom line is you just don't know?

Cheers,

 

[Steve Eddy]

Re: False Claims = Dishonest Claims = Charlatanry

Steve, you have also made statements here regarding subjectives, so why not elaborate on your subjective findings ?.

Because I don't care to elaborate nor do I feel there's any need to elaborate.

Explanations of why "i think it's better" are useful to communicate impressions of sonic differences.

You mean like how dogs **** on things to communicate their presence to other dogs?

se