Revisiting some "old" ideas from 1970's - IPS, OPS

Hi Thimios, thank you for the spectrums - looking good.

I think overall distortion level may be even lower if you roughly double the bias - as I remember, my optimum value was 62.5mA of idle current per output pair.
It's interesting that distortion level is rather consistent throughout the bandwidth.

Cheers,
Valery
Hi Valery,idle is already 31mA/piece=62mA/pair.;)
I have something interesting too.
Another test using a real speaker as load.
 
Last edited:
AX-Deluxe FFT Test.

Using a real 3way speaker as load.
 

Attachments

  • 5V REAL SPEAKER.PNG
    5V REAL SPEAKER.PNG
    102.3 KB · Views: 316
  • 8V REAL SPEAKER.PNG
    8V REAL SPEAKER.PNG
    102.6 KB · Views: 312
  • 14V REAL SPEAKER.PNG
    14V REAL SPEAKER.PNG
    103.8 KB · Views: 314
  • 17V REAL SPEAKER.PNG
    17V REAL SPEAKER.PNG
    103.5 KB · Views: 305
  • 22V REAL SPEAKER.PNG
    22V REAL SPEAKER.PNG
    99.5 KB · Views: 304
Last edited:
Hi Valery,idle is already 31mA/piece=62mA/pair.;)
I have something interesting too.
Another test using a real speaker as load.

Emmm... in the complementary pair, transistors (as well as emitter resistors) are connected in series. Meaning that the voltage drop across those resistors sums up, but the current stays the same.

So, you need to have 14mV across each 0.22R resistor, or 28mV across 2 resistors in series ;)
 
AX-Deluxe New Bias

17mA/0.22R Looks like the optimum.
 

Attachments

  • STEPS 29.56 PEAK MNAX 6R DUMMY.PNG
    STEPS 29.56 PEAK MNAX 6R DUMMY.PNG
    60.4 KB · Views: 72
  • 28.3V 6R.PNG
    28.3V 6R.PNG
    109.7 KB · Views: 73
  • 26.6V 6R.PNG
    26.6V 6R.PNG
    106.2 KB · Views: 70
  • 21V 6R.PNG
    21V 6R.PNG
    106.2 KB · Views: 74
  • 14V 6R.PNG
    14V 6R.PNG
    105.6 KB · Views: 86
  • 12V 6R.PNG
    12V 6R.PNG
    105.3 KB · Views: 84
  • 5V 6R.PNG
    5V 6R.PNG
    105.3 KB · Views: 89
  • 2.5v 6R 17mA 0.22R.PNG
    2.5v 6R 17mA 0.22R.PNG
    104.3 KB · Views: 98
Harmonics 2 and 3 with dominant 3, but rather low absolute values and rather clean high-order areas. I like the way it looks. The amp is also rather tolerant of bias variations - previous measurements with less than 50% bias setting are still good enough :cool:

Did you audition the thing?
It will be interesting what TubSuMo front-end is going to show under the same conditions.
 
Harmonics 2 and 3 with dominant 3, but rather low absolute values and rather clean high-order areas. I like the way it looks. The amp is also rather tolerant of bias variations - previous measurements with less than 50% bias setting are still good enough :cool:

Did you audition the thing?
It will be interesting what TubSuMo front-end is going to show under the same conditions.
Just for a little but not on main speakers(i haven't protection board yet).
I think that is a nice sounding IPS.
When i will have the TubSumo on hand we will know the difference.
Distortion numbers look better with a speaker attached. I though it would be the other way around.
That's why we run the test!
Real world is different than simulations.;)
 
Hi Thimios,

Are you sure the pinout is correct (I mean, the CBE leads are connected as expected)?
Input stage current is around 1.3mA per collector and it does not depend on hFE of the pair.
By the way, hFE of 2N5089 you used initially is normally around 1000.

So, my guess is the wrong pinout :)

Cheers,
Valery
 
Hi Thimios,

Are you sure the pinout is correct (I mean, the CBE leads are connected as expected)?
Input stage current is around 1.3mA per collector and it does not depend on hFE of the pair.
By the way, hFE of 2N5089 you used initially is normally around 1000.

So, my guess is the wrong pinout :)

Cheers,
Valery
Because i haven't any 2N5089 i used 2N5088 in my board.
Yes i'm sure for pinout,pins c,e reverced in one side.
 
Last edited: