Did you try renaming it from zip to something else temporarily? Gmail's limit is 25MB I'm pretty sure, it just doesn't like zip.
That was weird. I have received larger files than that before (including .zip). According to the guidelines they do not accept zip-files which contain zip-files or .exe files.
Try changing Hornresp.exe to Hornresp.nose or something similarly absurd before zipping. There is no way the guys at Google can figure that one out...
Try changing Hornresp.exe to Hornresp.nose or something similarly absurd before zipping. There is no way the guys at Google can figure that one out...
Last edited:
I'm pleased to be able to make comments about such a useful program in the first place!
Interesting the methods of encoding could be the same and yet read differently. I to learned something that I forgot about. The memories are from almost thirty years ago when I was at school programming. ACSII addresses are much more definitive. And may be the way to address this situation as David mentioned.
Interesting the methods of encoding could be the same and yet read differently. I to learned something that I forgot about. The memories are from almost thirty years ago when I was at school programming. ACSII addresses are much more definitive. And may be the way to address this situation as David mentioned.
Hi Mark,
The bad news is that unfortunately, it didn't make any difference - I feared that might prove to be the case
.The good news is that while doing further testing, Øivind found an unrelated bug in the Loudspeaker Wizard, which will be fixed in the next release, planned for tomorrow.
Kind regards,
David
David,
I know this question has been asked a million times in this thread but I'm going to go for it again. What are the chances of a 5 segment tapped horn with
TH1 = 5 segment tapped horn with driver entry point at S1 and exit point at S4,
Ap1 = 1st segment tapped horn cross-sectional area (sq cm), and
Lpt = 1st segment tapped horn length (cm) to S1?
Did I describe that option correctly?
I know this question has been asked a million times in this thread but I'm going to go for it again. What are the chances of a 5 segment tapped horn with
TH1 = 5 segment tapped horn with driver entry point at S1 and exit point at S4,
Ap1 = 1st segment tapped horn cross-sectional area (sq cm), and
Lpt = 1st segment tapped horn length (cm) to S1?
Did I describe that option correctly?
Attachments
Last edited:
Hi BP1Fanatic,
Unfortunately zero
.It would require just too many changes to too many parts of the program. Another one for AkAbak.
Kind regards,
David
Hornresp Update 3630-150103
Hi Everyone,
Happy New Year!
CHANGE 1
Directivity tool response results for the rear radiated output were not correct. This problem has now been fixed.
CHANGE 2
Loudspeaker Wizard response results for direct radiator loudspeakers having multiple drivers were not correct. This problem has now been fixed. My thanks to Øivind ('minkuni') for finding the bug.
CHANGE 3
Several minor glitches in the Help file functionality have been fixed. Help file page numbers are now also shown.
Unfortunately the Wine issue reported by Øivind in Post #5139 could not be resolved with code changes to Hornresp, and it remains an ongoing problem.
Kind regards,
David
Hi Everyone,
Happy New Year!
CHANGE 1
Directivity tool response results for the rear radiated output were not correct. This problem has now been fixed.
CHANGE 2
Loudspeaker Wizard response results for direct radiator loudspeakers having multiple drivers were not correct. This problem has now been fixed. My thanks to Øivind ('minkuni') for finding the bug.
CHANGE 3
Several minor glitches in the Help file functionality have been fixed. Help file page numbers are now also shown.
Unfortunately the Wine issue reported by Øivind in Post #5139 could not be resolved with code changes to Hornresp, and it remains an ongoing problem.
Kind regards,
David
Hi David,
Just downloaded the latest update, and now it's officially 2015.
*** Happy New Year! ***
Thanks for keeping up w/ things.
Regards,
Hi Oliver,
At least I managed to get the year right - even if sometimes I don't know what month it is (as evidenced in the extract below from my Post #67).
The upload month should have been May (05) and not April (04)
.Kind regards,
David
Hornresp Update 3630 -150106
Hi Everyone,
CHANGE
A number of alterations have been made to the source code to overcome problems experienced by Øivind ('minkuni') when using Hornresp with Wine.
It took a little while, but we finally got there.
"If at first you don’t succeed..."
Kind regards,
David
Hi Everyone,
CHANGE
A number of alterations have been made to the source code to overcome problems experienced by Øivind ('minkuni') when using Hornresp with Wine.
It took a little while, but we finally got there
."If at first you don’t succeed..."
Kind regards,
David
Hi Justin,
No - the four Hornresp Filter Wizard options (Passive, Active, Le Cléac'h, Equaliser) are mutually exclusive.
Kind regards,
David
Hi David
I have made a FreeCAD python script which generates a CAD file for a compression driver/horn adapter, Python script for generating exponential throat adaptor.
The script parameters are:
The generated adapter increases cutoff frequency linearly from entry to exit.
Maybe you are interested in including the "linearly varying cutoff frequency exponential" horn flare in Hornresp? It would be cool to simulate horns with their throat adapters.
I have made a FreeCAD python script which generates a CAD file for a compression driver/horn adapter, Python script for generating exponential throat adaptor.
The script parameters are:
- Entry radius
- Exit radius
- Entry cutoff frequency
- Exit cutoff frequecy
The generated adapter increases cutoff frequency linearly from entry to exit.
Maybe you are interested in including the "linearly varying cutoff frequency exponential" horn flare in Hornresp? It would be cool to simulate horns with their throat adapters.
Hi Mårten,
Being able to specify entry and exit flare tangent angles rather than cutoff frequencies could perhaps result in an even more useful tool
.The important thing is to ensure that there are no discontinuities in the transition from the compression driver to the horn. The cutoff frequency of the adaptor is of little consequence provided that the adaptor is relatively short compared to the length of the horn. You can see this for yourself by using segment 1 as the throat adaptor, and changing the flare from Con to Exp to Par. The overall adaptor (segment 1) plus horn (segment 2) response remains essentially unchanged.
What about an algorithm to calculate a smooth transition from the following input parameters?
- Compression driver exit radius
- Compression driver exit flare tangent angle
- Horn throat radius
- Horn throat flare tangent angle
- Adaptor length
David
Hi Mark,
Not at all - it was a rhetorical question only
.I just thought that it might be better in principle for the adaptor to match the actual physical flare tangent angles of the compression driver and the horn, rather than for the adaptor design to be based on theoretical cutoff frequencies.
Kind regards,
David