Demetris, Milevas...and others too...

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
sorry for no interior "porn" pix....

but here's one....
 

Attachments

  • int1-small.jpg
    int1-small.jpg
    91.5 KB · Views: 1,313
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Re: exterior porn...and a Q for Dave...

planet10 said:
I'm eager to see the round shouldered supraBaffled LGS.

In the works, I believe. =)


Nanook said:
panamaniac, your speakers are beautifully finished...

Thanks Stew, they are very pretty - that bamboo plywood is beautiful. But I didn't build them, my associates up in Seattle did. So they are closer than you think....
You're gonna love yours, I'm sure.

I'm half way thru a pair of open baffles using 1/4" bamboo ply as veneer over 1" pine. Nice looking, kinda like a big (16x35") cutting board. :p When I dragged one into the living room this afternoon my wife called it a "cute little speaker." Now that's WAF!

I think the Mileva fits the "cute little speaker" description pretty well, too.
 
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
Corloc said:
Are these monoliths mltqwt? Or there is there a particular ratio or alignment. If they are mltqwt, I think there is plans on the net for the JX92s that I can bend to my will.

Sort of. In the end they are sort of a mass-loaded BIB, but we call them ML-Vs

Here is the (now not so) secret receipe for a monoloth. Take a Metronome (or an actul ML-V) and fold it just above the driver position (usually 50% in an ML-V). Convert the port to a slot (the higher the aspect & the longer it is the more aperiodic the characteristic -- and with the desired placement close to a wall these can provide more bass than you want*), and remove the little tiny piece representing the top so that the line reaches to a point. Some juggling of depth may be required to get the driver to fit, get the width right.

*(resistively loading the port with some foam can further tune the bottom if you have too much, as can polyfluff just above & below the driver)

I would appreciate it, if any designs that come of these get feed back so i can post them on the box-plans page.

I like the simplicity and that the cabinet is naturally well braced.

Anytime you can use 1 piece to do 2 jobs i like it... elegance was something i took away from all those math proofs i did in University.

dave
 
Monolithists of the world unite!

My original intent and a little history...

originally my intent was to rebox some DCM Time Frames (TF250s) for my nephew--he has two pairs. I sold these when they were new. The speakers, although not very revealling, and not terribly expensive (at the time they sold for CAD$300/pr), made music.

Upon opening the enclosures, the drivers, box and crossover were not worth improving, each were terribly low quality, so on to a "monolith" search. That was 2 or 3 years ago and my introduction to diyAudio.com .

I never thought it would all end up here, trying my Hemps in a Demetri. I do have to say that the biggest challenge has been getting the panels cut, and cutting out the openings for the drivers. Next biggest challenge: the side "horn" attachment. no router use, just well glued butt joints (Bulldog PL300 construction adhesive works great for this). Hoping next pair will be easier.

For all who have two left thumbs: If I can do it, anybody can. And for any that think a full range driver can't possibly make bass, or have enough "sparkle" think again.

The Hemps I purchashed are excellent in this regard. So too are the Fostex drivers, and even my old 12" Oxfords (although they do need a tweeter).

So for any that might doubt that they could live with a single driver: until you try them, don't discount them as an option. You can always add an active sub if you need more bass, or an add on tweeter (like the Fostex types) if you need more sparkle.

I've even made a convert of my eldest daughter's boyfriend---he's dumping home theatre in favour of good two channel (not expensive, but good).
 
From what I understand the Demetris plans are designed for the Hemp Acoustics FR8C (or FE207) which is a totally different driver than the A Brown Soun FR8. The differences have been talked to death in other threads but I just wanted to check if I get the A Brown Soun drivers, will they work in the Demetris design? Cool design and nice builds so far!
Thanks - Max
 
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
maxdd_nj said:
I just wanted to check if I get the A Brown Soun drivers, will they work in the Demetris design? Cool design and nice builds so far!

If you get the TT drivers and we determine that Demetri isn't the right vehicle then we'll just come up with a monolith suitable for them. (that the same box is OK for FR8c, FE207 and FE167 (the last with a minor port change) illustrates that it is a pretty tolerant box,

What are the most recent parameters for these?

dave
 
I know from personal experience, that the HempA FR8c whizzer is very easy to make dissapear. The one on the FE207 is not.

Thanx for that Dave - I have given serious thought to a de-whizzered, phase plugged, EnABLed FR8c... that with tweeter support in Demitri should make for a pretty satisfying 'speaker.

As for the TT green cones, I think Dr Dan was pushing TT to release those a while back. IIRC they had a pretty steeply rising response that Dan eq'ed out on Foobar?

Thanx again Dave.
 
whizzerless Hemp FR8c...

well as the owner of the p10 modded Hemps I can tell you several things...

  • the bass from the Hemp/Demetris is near subwoofing (using a Sony SCHP 1001 as a cd player)
  • I think that after 3-4 months now, I can say the whizzerless Hemp is smoother, with help from C37...
  • and so on and so on
 
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
I did the EnABL pattern on the FR8c you see posted. Did the painting at 6AM in the hotel bathroom! My buddies Mike and Brain actually built the box. Mike is working on a version with a supra-baffle and some more curves to the box. Bamboo, of course.

Talked to Mike today, he likes the sound he's getting out of the Demetri a lot. Says it sounds great and has plenty of bass when right up against the wall. If it weren't for cosmetic reasons, he would put the binding posts on the side of the box, so that the speakers could be snug against the wall. BSC? What BSC?

I haven't heard the FR8c without the whizzer, but have seen a plot of one sans whizzer and with phase plug. Looked very smooth. No top octave, but that's what super tweeters are for, right?

Is that what you have, Nanook?
 
Hi Nanook and Pano'

Thanx for the info on the Hemps and Demitri. Seems I have made a decision to go with these... I will send P10 an email WRT modded hemps when I am a little closer. I have been putting off changing my system for a while due to a demanding study schedule and having a decent system already. Well, I am just finishing up my last semester (two weeks to go) and am moving to a smaller place in Sydney early next year - which means no room for tall ribbons 1.5m into the room!

Seems that as one part of a journey comes to a close another begins.

Thanx guys.
 
sans whizzer and mit phase plug..:)

I damaged my Hemp Acoustics FR8Cs just prior to heading to Vancouver Island DIY audiofest this past summer. Dave cut the whizzers off, and added the phase plugs, and c37 to the cones.

a huge difference. I've been a little chicken to EnABL them cause I don't have the correct stuff to do it with. I however do agree completely with BudP's ideas, and the EnABL process makes absolute sense to me....one day I may get my nerve up, else do my reversible EnABL mod (don't ask, it'll only drive ya crazy).

I have considered using 100% natural latex rubber painted on in the correct pattern as well.

tonight I finally heard the Demetris near sub-woof using a Sony Playstation (unmodded) as a cdplayer. Many are amazed at what the playstation can do. Do yourself a favour and get one while you can. I'm even contemplating having "knock-offs" to be built using many of the same components. Maybe have to ask the big red S for some licencing...
 
Fast1one said:
So many options, so little time :(

How would these work for say the Pioneer BOFU? And how would it compare to the half-changs? My drivers are coming in soon, Im so confused :bawling: These look so much more elegant than the Half changs, not to mention practically no need for a BSC :D
Anyone have an answer for my question? The Hemps do share the same BIB dimensions as the B20, here are the measured specifications courtesy of slomatt, which seem to be slightly different than the manufactured specs given:

slomatt said:
Greetings,

Here are the t/s parameters for a B20FU driver as measured by Jack from NHT. There are no units associated with the parameters which introduces some confusion. I've included the standard metric units below in parenthesis with a question mark to indicate a final determination has not yet been made.

Please give these an eyeball and help to confirm my assumed units are correct.

Re = 6.17 ohm
Diameter = 165 mm
DriveLevel = 20 mV

Fs = 37.66 Hz
Qms = 2.544
Qes = .524
Qts = .435
Vas = 96.27 (L?)
Cms = .0015 (m/N?)
Mms = 11.91 (g?)
Mair = 1.77 (g?)
BL = 5.76 (Tm?)
SPL = 91.74 (1w or 2.83v?)
No = .94 (%/100?)
Zmax = 36.12 ohm
Sd = .021382 (m^2?)

- Matt
Note the QTS is lower as well as the FS when compared to the manufacture specs.

Edit: Reviewing the specs for the Hemp, looks like it will work, only difference is the FS (About an 8 hz difference) would this lead to lower bass? Or would the cabinets have to be changed slightly?
 
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
Fast1one said:
Anyone have an answer for my question? The Hemps do share the same BIB dimensions as the B20, here are the measured specifications courtesy of slomatt, which seem to be slightly different than the manufactured specs given:

I was waiting for Scott to answer based on an actual sim. These boxes seem pretty driver tolerant so if specs are close it will likely work althou slightly different tuning may make it better.

dave
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.