JBL GTO1214D
Hi,
This driver is currently available on ebay below $90.--, free shipping:
JBL GTO 1214D CAR AUDIO/STEREO 12" SUB SUBWOOFER 1214 D - eBay (item 380274589025 end time Oct-30-10 20:48:32 PDT)
Regards,
Hi,
This driver is currently available on ebay below $90.--, free shipping:
JBL GTO 1214D CAR AUDIO/STEREO 12" SUB SUBWOOFER 1214 D - eBay (item 380274589025 end time Oct-30-10 20:48:32 PDT)
Regards,
why are the 2 drivers mounted like this? why not both on one side?
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Last edited:
Remember the link I gave you, this is again a push-pull set up.why are the 2 drivers mounted like this? why not both on one side?
Both cones move at the same time in the same direction. So one of the drivers needs to be wired out of fase.so drivers are wired 'in phase' ? but function out of phase because of mounting 180* off axis?
thank you.
Both cones move at the same time in the same direction. So one of the drivers needs to be wired out of fase.
you cant keep a real music lover down
Tang Band W6-1139SI 6-1/2" Subwoofer
i picked the subs up REALLY cheap,
a little finish sanding/work and this will be the subwoofer for my new boom box build
http://www.parts-express.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?Partnumber=320-302
yes it sounds great,
not ive tested nothing.
the only math i did was *guess* that the cone area of a 6.5 is slightly less then half that of a 12.
so i divided all the numbers on the plans by 100 and multiplied that number by 42 (42%??)
my thinking is if the proportion of cone area to box physics is the same, i should get similar performance
it definitely gets very low and is smooth in its delivery
thank you Petter Persson for the design
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Tang Band W6-1139SI 6-1/2" Subwoofer
i picked the subs up REALLY cheap,
a little finish sanding/work and this will be the subwoofer for my new boom box build
http://www.parts-express.com/pe/showdetl.cfm?Partnumber=320-302
yes it sounds great,
not ive tested nothing.
the only math i did was *guess* that the cone area of a 6.5 is slightly less then half that of a 12.
so i divided all the numbers on the plans by 100 and multiplied that number by 42 (42%??)
my thinking is if the proportion of cone area to box physics is the same, i should get similar performance
it definitely gets very low and is smooth in its delivery
thank you Petter Persson for the design
Last edited:
plans are on page 1 of this thread ...
Sorry, i meant for your mini version of the horn
Sorry, i meant for your mini version of the horn
i arrived at my box calculations with some very basic math
i divided all the numbers on the plans by 100 and multiplied that number by 42 (42%??)
seems i was wrong though because it seems a 6.5 is closer to 1/3 not 1/2 the cone area of a 12?
ive scaled many designs like this over the years, find a box design i like, find a driver/s i want to use, and built something i believe might work.
ive had good results so far, i never measure anything and always get lots of bass and never built anything i didnt enjoy using.
you cant keep a real music lover down
So, you didn't use the push/pull of the original design?
So, you didn't use the push/pull of the original design?
I couldnt get the driver in backwards, the magnet is quite deep and the space available (in my box) quite shallow,
i thought about spacers,
for about 0.002 seconds
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Subwoofers
- Build your own 2x12" TH (The Kraken 212 TH)