Looks like the MPSA42 is still available, wonder how much longer for....
MPSA92 doesn't look as it would be quite so easy to get hold of.
Using SMD might allow the saved space to be used for maybe onboard fuses and speaker protection, while still keeping the compact overall size of the PCB.
MPSA92 doesn't look as it would be quite so easy to get hold of.
Using SMD might allow the saved space to be used for maybe onboard fuses and speaker protection, while still keeping the compact overall size of the PCB.
Haha, I wish ....
Design I would leave up to someone far more knowledgeable than myself, you would think that 40+ years in the electronics industry I would have a solid know how and understanding of how to build and design from the ground up, but I don't.
Yet, I can take a failed aircraft computer, Amp, Whatever, and providing I have a Circuit diagram, Scope, DMM.. etc, and fix it.
It's like formula's, Until I see a formula with an example, except for the really easy ones, I might just as well be staring at a blank page
I would like to see the Maplin Mosfet Amp, lets say given a make over, or bought up to date, while retaining it's simple design and compact size, with all of the ideas and little changes mentioned throughout this thread incorporated into a new PCB Layout.
I suppose it's a case of if enough people think it is a worthy contender of upgrading or updating.
I suppose it's a case of if enough people think it is a worthy contender of upgrading or updating.
That would be something I'd like to do.
Some thoughts...
- Splitting supply into frontend and FET's, since frontend / gate drive has to swing remarkably above output (source) voltage
- more current to drive the FET's
- forward gain path as linear as possible, allowing even no or low feedback experiments (eg by loading the VAS or higher input device degeneration
- FET's as input devices (LSK / SK170, J113, ...) or complementary input
Just thinking loud...
Yep, I see the original design as being suitable only for 8 ohm loads.
From a point of view of keeping the original design, and considering sensible enhancements, I can see a wish list forming from this thread:
Support for 2 parallel pairs of output devices
Current limiting / Vgs zener clamps
DC offset protection / output clamp
Direct-to-heatsink mounting
First stage current source
Improve layout WRT grounding and decoupling
Gate resistors closer to devices
.. and then we could get into a complete redesign, of course.
From a point of view of keeping the original design, and considering sensible enhancements, I can see a wish list forming from this thread:
Support for 2 parallel pairs of output devices
Current limiting / Vgs zener clamps
DC offset protection / output clamp
Direct-to-heatsink mounting
First stage current source
Improve layout WRT grounding and decoupling
Gate resistors closer to devices
.. and then we could get into a complete redesign, of course.
this is my new uprated Maplin module ... still work in progress .. but is very similar to the maplin schematic but with a LED bias for the long tailed pair input .. and a very heavy duty PCB with thick high current tracks .. but all based on the same design
The experts amongst you will recognize the PCB ??
The experts amongst you will recognize the PCB ??
Attachments
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.