• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

01A question

Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
For me the disadvantage of over damped/over filtrated PSU is the output impedance frequency response.

These type (large inductivities with large DCR) circuits commonly has large hump around/under 10Hz, so in general tend to swing if load (amplifier) pull it.

My #26 preamp has simple raw HT supply: AZ1-5uF-10H(100R)-47uF-3H(80R)-220uF.
The hump (about 15Hz) value about 50R, the impedance at 100Hz 7 Ohm.
I use SSHV2 (CCS input), so the load of raw supply is constant (constant current), the impedance peek is irrelevant.

Your original solution has 1.2k peek at -about- 5Hz, 10Hz value 600R, 100Hz value 48R.
This is not problem, if your load -almost constant (for example CCS loaded preamp), but gyrator is dynamic load, the current swing the pace of the music.
At large tutti the current load is pull the PSU, so parasitic swinging would happens.
 
For me the disadvantage of over damped/over filtrated PSU is the output impedance frequency response.

These type (large inductivities with large DCR) circuits commonly has large hump around/under 10Hz, so in general tend to swing if load (amplifier) pull it.

My #26 preamp has simple raw HT supply: AZ1-5uF-10H(100R)-47uF-3H(80R)-220uF.
The hump (about 15Hz) value about 50R, the impedance at 100Hz 7 Ohm.
I use SSHV2 (CCS input), so the load of raw supply is constant (constant current), the impedance peek is irrelevant.

Your original solution has 1.2k peek at -about- 5Hz, 10Hz value 600R, 100Hz value 48R.
This is not problem, if your load -almost constant (for example CCS loaded preamp), but gyrator is dynamic load, the current swing the pace of the music.
At large tutti the current load is pull the PSU, so parasitic swinging would happens.
Thanks for the explanation Bela, now I just have try to understand it! :confused:
 
For me the disadvantage of over damped/over filtrated PSU is the output impedance frequency response.

These type (large inductivities with large DCR) circuits commonly has large hump around/under 10Hz, so in general tend to swing if load (amplifier) pull it.

My #26 preamp has simple raw HT supply: AZ1-5uF-10H(100R)-47uF-3H(80R)-220uF.
The hump (about 15Hz) value about 50R, the impedance at 100Hz 7 Ohm.
I use SSHV2 (CCS input), so the load of raw supply is constant (constant current), the impedance peek is irrelevant.

Your original solution has 1.2k peek at -about- 5Hz, 10Hz value 600R, 100Hz value 48R.
This is not problem, if your load -almost constant (for example CCS loaded preamp), but gyrator is dynamic load, the current swing the pace of the music.
At large tutti the current load is pull the PSU, so parasitic swinging would happens.
So does the PSU output vary with the music frequency when the load (gyrator) is dynamic? Due to the PSU reactance varying with frequency? Or have I misunderstood?
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
I'm in the middle of transformation of my (5mA CCS loaded, TVC output) #26 preamp to switchable #26/01a.

I overcome my laziness and last night put together the most critical parts, the 01a driver.

I use DC coupled SiC FET source follower as driver between 01a (20R filament biased, 5mA CCS loaded 201a) and TVC.

There are the measurements of the driver.

p.s. the bad hum components due to the breadboard wiring.
 

Attachments

  • 201a(3) 1V in spectrum.jpg
    201a(3) 1V in spectrum.jpg
    58.3 KB · Views: 347
  • 201a(3) 5mA CCS loaded, SiC CF.jpg
    201a(3) 5mA CCS loaded, SiC CF.jpg
    194.6 KB · Views: 288
Attics all round then! I just fired up the Coleman regs (in the attic!) and fed them 13V-20V to see if they would handle my type 26 PSU voltage. They do, but using 3R9 as R1 in the Coleman, I can't get the current below 200mA, although the voltage will change. Is this normal? I don't think I need less than 200mA, but I would like to understand it.
 
I don't have a 4R7, but added 1R0 to the 3R9 and tried that. It turns out that I am not fully recovered from my recent illness after all. But I did discover there are several ways to misconnect the power and both DVMs without actually destroying anything! :eek:
Anyway, it worked, eventually. I have 200mA at 3.4V again, but can go down to 160mA and 2.6V.
Maybe I should leave the HT until my brain has recovered? :D
 
My Filament Regulators come with R1 of 3.9Ω for 01A as standard, to support the normal 250mA current level. you can change to any other value of R1, but for best performance (once you are finished testing) set R1 so that it drops 1.0V (0.95 - 1.05V) for preference: this will give the best dc stability and overall performance.

R2 is a resistor-position parallel-connected to R1, to make it easier to get to odd values. So if you decide on a final design current of 200mA, you can use R1=5.1Ω, or R1 = R2 = 10Ω.

R1 and R2 should always be wirewound resistors, over-rated for the power they must burn.