starting F5
I'm trying to get two cviller boards on this heatsink. Anyone here know if this will get too hot with standard bias settings? Measurements are around 10 by 9 by 1 3/4" and the copper heat spreader is about 1/4" thick. I am planning on populating the inners on the top and the outers on the bottom for a 4 channel amp. This picture would indicate just the left channel for instance.
Thanks,
Everett
I'm trying to get two cviller boards on this heatsink. Anyone here know if this will get too hot with standard bias settings? Measurements are around 10 by 9 by 1 3/4" and the copper heat spreader is about 1/4" thick. I am planning on populating the inners on the top and the outers on the bottom for a 4 channel amp. This picture would indicate just the left channel for instance.
Thanks,
Everett
I'm not exactly sure what 8off means, but I assume it means 8x or something like that. In that case, no there would only be 4 boards in this chassis. I read your post about heat sinks and it sounds like there will probably be too much heat, but I don't know how much heat my sinks can dissipate since they're salvaged. I have also not seen heat spreaders on commercial sinks, so it's hard to compare. All I can go by is dimensions, so hopefully someone else is more knowledgeable in this area.
Nice copper spreader!
Two channels on a 10x9 heat sink might leave you with a very hot
amp. Are you running it balanced? If so, you could lower the supply voltage a bit.Thanks Christian, I see that my second set of boards shipped too. Here's what I have going so far. Just a mock up, but I think it will look pretty nice once I get it all populated. I'll probably end up doing one board per side and use the back sink for rectifier diodes. I have never built a class A amp, so it's hard for me to imagine such a large amount of heat coming from two MOSFETs. I guess I can always add a channel if I find that it runs cooler than expected.
I think the backplate is only 1/16" or so because they (sorry can't take the credit) milled the copper into the aluminum. The copper is more like 5/16" upon further inspection making a total plate of 3/8". I plugged all the dims into the ESP heatsink spreadsheet and got 0.65 deg C/W. I guess I just wanted more outputs for this giant footprint, but I'm probably going to end up splitting the boards into two amps, otherwise I may end up with a (not so) portable space heater
I found another interesting link in case someone wants some very indepth reading on heatsinks.
I found another interesting link in case someone wants some very indepth reading on heatsinks.
There is a free download that allows modeling of any shape heatsink with single or multiple devices of any size to be located any where.
Great for finding the optimum locations for minimum Tc for all devices.
I can't recall the website, but it is associated with a commercial operation.
With the thin remaining backplate, the copper spreader is definately required.
I see milling marks on the copper. If the other side looks similar then all these must be ground off to allow intimate contact between the aluminium and the copper. Similarly for the aluminium. You want the maximum area of metal to metal contact at the interface. Any and all gaps must be filled with thermal compound. You will need a lot more screws to clamp the plates together, to ensure that metal to metal contact, to the point of buckling the plates where there are bigger gaps.
Great for finding the optimum locations for minimum Tc for all devices.
I can't recall the website, but it is associated with a commercial operation.
With the thin remaining backplate, the copper spreader is definately required.
I see milling marks on the copper. If the other side looks similar then all these must be ground off to allow intimate contact between the aluminium and the copper. Similarly for the aluminium. You want the maximum area of metal to metal contact at the interface. Any and all gaps must be filled with thermal compound. You will need a lot more screws to clamp the plates together, to ensure that metal to metal contact, to the point of buckling the plates where there are bigger gaps.
With a double supply ("monobloc" or "dual mono") the inter channel isolation is 100%.
With a single supply ("stereo") there is some interchannel "cross-talk" via the supply.
We're assuming in the second case there are two, not one power transformers??
In practice it may not make a real world difference to your ears - or it might.
Certainly opens up different chassis variations.
_-_-bear
With a single supply ("stereo") there is some interchannel "cross-talk" via the supply.
We're assuming in the second case there are two, not one power transformers??
In practice it may not make a real world difference to your ears - or it might.
Certainly opens up different chassis variations.
_-_-bear
the core, the primary and the chassis are common between the two channels. That can never have as good separation as two monoblocks.
But, 4 isolated secondaries is a very big improvement on a shared set of secondaries.