Go Back   Home > Forums > >

Build: Dual mono push-push
Build: Dual mono push-push
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 28th May 2020, 05:40 PM   #1
MtBiker is offline MtBiker  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Default Build: Dual mono push-push

This is not a recent build, but I have been meaning to post it for several years. It is also a precursor to a 3-way speaker build thread I intend to post that builds on this one.
Design Requirements

I was replacing an old NHT1259-based sub that had been in the corner and had sufficient output for the room, but I wanted lower distortion, more headroom and it had to be hidden. I was also planning on replacing closed cabinets with an open stereo rack that would be perpendicular to the wall, and obscured from view by a screen. This would allow me to easily access the front and back of each component, and had no doors that would trap heat. I could have built subs into the front corner wall, but this would have been an involved project entering attic space below a sloping roofline, and I decided it would be easier to push the stereo rack to the ceiling and leave room underneath it for the sub (centered on the front wall). Here is a rendering with the outgoing sub under the new rack:

TV_room_7.0.jpg

Being directly under the stereo rack (but not touching it), I knew I wanted to limit vibration, so I decided to build a push-push sub. Limiting it to the width of the rack above it did not leave enough depth for back to back drivers, so they would need to be rotated and fire along the length of the room instead of left to right. However, I did not like the idea of them firing into the wall and the back of the screen, so I decided to have them face each other and radiate out a slot.

sketchup_dimensioned.jpg

Design Details
  • (2) Dayton Audio RSS315HF-4 12" Reference
  • HF Subwoofer 4 Ohm in sealed cabinets.
  • Dual drivers face each other for force cancellation, which works quite well. Cabinet vibration is almost imperceptible.
  • Both cabinets are cut from a single sheet of plywood, well braced, and doubled up on some walls.
  • The cabinets are joined by heavy, threaded rods which are concealed by aluminum tubing. I think the tubing is causing the high frequency ringing during sweep measurements, but it is far outside the passband.
  • Rubber gaskets under large diameter washers ensure an airtight seal for the threaded rods.
  • Copious use of shellac prior to priming ensures no seams are visible through the paint.
  • Spray painted using rattle cans, but finished with General Finishes flat water-based poly via HVLP.
  • Total dimensions (including 4 gap between cabinets) is 23 W x 19.25 H x 16.25 D
  • Internal cabinet volume is approximately 30 liters with a QTC of 0.83, but as built, it measures like 20 liters with a QTC of 0.96.
  • Crossover and room EQ provided by MiniDSP 2x4HD

The room is an odd L shape to the back left, and with an additional bump out and a sloped ceiling to the right. I did not try to simulate room gain or modes. I did simulate and measure the nearfield response, and I measured the response at the listening position with room gain. Coincidentally, the room gain flattened most of the low end falloff and I did not have to apply any EQ to raise the low end. The sub is crossed over to the main speakers at 80Hz and room modes are equalized out at the listening position below 150Hz.

cut_sheet_2.jpg
IMG_1256_1.jpg
IMG_1760_1.jpg
IMG_9930_1.jpg
TV_room_7.1.jpg
IMG_1879_1.jpg
RSS315H nearfield and EQ.png
318.3 Rsub GPout noEQ distortion percent.png

More build photos available here.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th May 2020, 03:28 AM   #2
MtBiker is offline MtBiker  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Waterfall at the LP including main speakers >80Hz.
XO414 TMWS LP waterfall 20-200Hz.png
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2020, 12:31 AM   #3
OllBoll is offline OllBoll  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by MtBiker View Post
...
Cool!

While it would change the internal volume and require smart solutions to compensate, if you inverted one driver you would reduce that 2nd harmonic distortion by a huge amount.
  Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2020, 12:56 AM   #4
planet10 is online now planet10  Canada
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Build: Dual mono push-push
Well done!!!

dave
__________________
Stay safe. Stay home. Respect the 2m bubble.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd June 2020, 11:40 PM   #5
Concillian is offline Concillian  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Dublin, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by OllBoll View Post
Cool!

While it would change the internal volume and require smart solutions to compensate, if you inverted one driver you would reduce that 2nd harmonic distortion by a huge amount.
So push-push with one flipped is significant distortion benefit over push-push as he is running it?

Planning the possibility of sub setups very similar to the OP's, but built into a false wall... If we are able to swing the addition to the house (current events are making us question those plans.) Basically imagine his box sunk into a wall and the only open side is the wall opening. It'd be easy to make the manifold wide enough to flip one basket around if that provides any benefit.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2020, 01:11 AM   #6
OllBoll is offline OllBoll  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Concillian View Post
So push-push with one flipped is significant distortion benefit over push-push as he is running it?

Planning the possibility of sub setups very similar to the OP's, but built into a false wall... If we are able to swing the addition to the house (current events are making us question those plans.) Basically imagine his box sunk into a wall and the only open side is the wall opening. It'd be easy to make the manifold wide enough to flip one basket around if that provides any benefit.
Yes, by a huge amount. It compensates that the forward and backward strokes are not exactly symmetric, but with one inverted then the sum of one forward + one back becomes symmetric thus less distortion.

Linkwitz uses it in hits LX521 and previous iterations he called the Dipole Woofer. There is a thread here talking about it also, A Thread for those interested in PPSL enclosures

Make sure you also mount them in a force cancelling setup like MtBiker has in his cool build. I remember a thread a while back when someone tested the distortion of a sub and found that a reduction of box vibration reduced disortion (mainly odd harmonics). And with a force cancelling setup there should be pretty much zero box vibration which is nice.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2020, 01:42 AM   #7
planet10 is online now planet10  Canada
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
 
planet10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC, NA, Sol III
Build: Dual mono push-push
Quote:
Originally Posted by Concillian View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by OllBoll View Post
While it would change the internal volume and require smart solutions to compensate, if you inverted one driver you would reduce that 2nd harmonic distortion by a huge amount.
So push-push with one flipped is significant distortion benefit over push-push as he is running it?
While it is true that 2nd is reduced, 3rd is increased, and it is generally considered that a decreasing amount of harmonics with 2nd higher than 3rd is better sounding.

To add to that, when i discussed this with Nick McKinney he said that a wekk designed linear driver such as the Llambda (or the Acoustic Elegance that descended from them, and others) will have little or no 2nd harmonic reduction.

Given those 2 points i see no benefit, and perhaps a detriment, to push-pull over push-push.

dave
__________________
Stay safe. Stay home. Respect the 2m bubble.
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th June 2020, 09:55 PM   #8
OllBoll is offline OllBoll  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by planet10 View Post
While it is true that 2nd is reduced, 3rd is increased, and it is generally considered that a decreasing amount of harmonics with 2nd higher than 3rd is better sounding.

To add to that, when i discussed this with Nick McKinney he said that a wekk designed linear driver such as the Llambda (or the Acoustic Elegance that descended from them, and others) will have little or no 2nd harmonic reduction.

Given those 2 points i see no benefit, and perhaps a detriment, to push-pull over push-push.

dave
Yes, the 3rd order reduction was strictly measured due to reduced vibration and not due to inverting one driver.

And on the 2nd order distortion not being significant that is only at ~ 100 and upwards. In the sub bass it makes a massive difference.

His own measurements show an excess of 2nd order distortion and a large peak at 30 hz. We can for the comparison use some measurements of a beast of a sub, the Seas L26ROY. Even it starts to rise in 2nd order distortion at below 100 hz. It is only true if the main distortion component is the actual motor, but for subs it is often the surround and suspension where inverting one driver can cancel those in the same way as assymetric motor distortion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2020, 12:42 AM   #9
norman bates is offline norman bates  United States
diyAudio Member
 
norman bates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: iowa
The 3rd order left in a push pull sub is meaningless.

The huge reduction in 2nd to me is the sound improvement.
And they disappear better.

I believe art welter argued the same 2nd/3rd, built push pull, measured it, and then also started carrying the push pull flag.

Ideally you want the drivers as close as you can.

I wouldn’t trust advice on push pull except by people who actually build them.
Djk found the most improvement were for weaker motor drivers.
Shorting rings don’t do much below 150hz.

I’ll get links later tonight.

Last edited by norman bates; 5th June 2020 at 12:45 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th June 2020, 01:50 AM   #10
norman bates is offline norman bates  United States
diyAudio Member
 
norman bates's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: iowa
PiSpeakers Forum - Push-pull versus shorting rings - Wayne Parham, June 21, 2006 at 16:18:33

"I had originally asked Eminence to investigate the possibility of putting a shorting ring into a subwoofer to reduce harmonic distortion. This would be used as the motor for high-performance subwoofer designs. JBL has been very successful with this technology and even though the distortion reduction works best above 100Hz, they have been able to reduce distortion at subwoofer frequencies as well. So I had hoped Eminence might be able to build an improved subwoofer too...….. Eminence found that they were unable to get significant distortion reduction below 150Hz from a shorting ring. The reason is pretty simple - The shorting ring works like a transformer winding, and it has to inductively couple enough energy to create a magnetic field large enough to offset the difference in force caused by flux modulation. As frequency goes down, this becomes harder and harder to do and the size of the ring becomes prohibitively large. The volume displaced by the ring makes magnet size smaller so more magnet has to be added to compensate and the requirements become a vicious cycle. So there just isn't enough "meat" to make a good flux stabilized subwoofer."

"The charts above show the harmonic spectrum of a high-power 30Hz sine applied to a pair of identical woofers on a baffle. The chart on the right has the woofers mounted in push-pull. Notice that the second harmonic is 25dB lower than the dual-woofer configuration that doesn't employ push-pull drive."

and the dxd 12012
KEN KREISEL DXD-12012 Dual 12" Push-Pull Subwoofer - HomeTheaterHifi.com

"30 Hz, 101 dB, 0.6% distortion? No problem with the KREISEL. No wonder movie and music studios use this subwoofer."

"The DXD-12012 is at least an order of magnitude better than that one, and in fact, has set a new record here at Secrets for the lowest distortion ever measured on any subwoofer."
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Build: Dual mono push-pushHide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
TV-bench push-push subwoofer idea - good for room modes? Defo Subwoofers 0 3rd July 2019 08:14 AM
Mono push-pull driver PCB pmillett Tubes / Valves 237 26th October 2018 07:37 PM
Push-push magnet rear vent question PeteMcK Multi-Way 5 20th August 2016 12:27 AM
Mono 5W-17W Power Amp using EL84 push-pull nbraz Tubes / Valves 30 27th July 2011 11:12 PM
help tuning push-push ApexJr super 8 woofer planet10 Subwoofers 22 28th September 2005 04:00 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:12 PM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2021 diyAudio
Wiki