Frequency Response Match for Older Ears

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Thanks for the link, I just read it. I know the popping, as it happens to my right ear when running loud sine sweeps. Now I know why! Noise bothers me more than most people, but that's allways been the case.

Maybe you know of equal loudness charts for old codgers?
 
What about "Tolerance For Loud Sounds Decreases with Age"?

Tolerance For Loud Noises Decreases With Age | EurekAlert! Science News

In a study comparing how young adults and senior citizens judge noise levels of rock music, Professor of Hearing and Speech Sciences Donald Fucci found that seniors rated rock music much higher on a loudness scale than younger people.
As many people age, they develop a common hearing loss condition, called presbycusis, in which hearing gradually deteriorates and certain sounds become distorted.When older people lose the high frequencies, they hear a distortion. What they hear resembles sound from an Edison phonograph more than sound from a high-quality stereo.
 
Maybe you know of equal loudness charts for old codgers?
Try this link:

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwin_tv-pqDqAhX7TRUIHYbZDcoQFjAAegQIAxAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jstage.jst.go.jp%2Farticle%2Fast%2F30%2F6%2F30_6_446%2F_pdf&usg=AOvVaw0gPEhIQ3BQu93qyzkFHb0M

Fig. 2 shows the comparison between young and older listeners. Much as you might expect.

The older listener group was less sensitive to high-frequency tones of 4,000 Hz and higher than was the young listener group. The contours of older listeners show steady growth as the frequency increases above 1,000 Hz, whereas those of young listeners distinctly show a dip at 4,000 Hz. Second, the older listener group was apparently more sensitive to low-frequency tones of 250 Hz and below than was the young listener group.
 
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2019
On the bright side you are now perfectly qualified for cap and wire denialism :cool:


But what's with the 60Hz? What makes you think you cannot hear lower frequencies?


:cool::D:)


I will make my ears measured by a ear specialist if I as the op and ask him - the specialist- what is needed for compensation - filter in mind ?-


Not being a specialist I'm not sure the last octave is a true lost, I will be more worried about notch frequencies (frequencies lost) below... Though HF is important for transcients and snaps but have no idea where is the limit needed !
Sibilance being around 6 k , triangle iirc between 6k to 8 k, I surmise transcient and snap needed for the speed feeling is up to 10 k hz max, but this is just a feeling and subjective thoughts.:eek:
 
Had tests done by professional audiologist a few years ago. And probably lost some more high frequency since then.

Problem with self testing is that you can't really depend on computer speakers to be flat at either the low or high end. Would need to have some really good headphones like the audiologists use in order to have any confidence in the results.
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2019
well the guys that test that know perfectly all about the ears, M&F and all curves and you are not biased during the test. I personally test mines every two years. that incredible with the older people how the notchs can impact the phrases and words understanding I noticed.... despite the brain makes shortcuts with several syllables to match them for the context understanding.... I assume it's more difficult with music according the spectrum (piano, claps....)
 
Is this the 100th time I've mentioned the El Greco fallacy at this forum?

When you go to a concert, is there anything wrong with the orchestra that needs EQ? (Hint: that's a trick question.)

You need to distinguish different functions of hearing. For example, the tonal balance can seem OK whatever your personal FR plot may be (it is the FR you are living with, eh). But you might still not be able to hear the triangle. You can hear the triangle if you boost the upper treble but then the tonal balance will be off.

A discussion for another day is just what does a hearing aid do.

B.
 
Last edited:
diyAudio Moderator
Joined 2008
Paid Member
I agree Ben, don't compensate for your hearing through your speakers, otherwise it will not sound natural the way you've come to accept that natural sounds currently (Unless you feel like a trip back in time each time you listen).

Also make sure your speakers go at least as high as you can hear for the same reason.
 
I agree Ben, don't compensate for your hearing through your speakers, otherwise it will not sound natural the way you've come to accept that natural sounds currently (Unless you feel like a trip back in time each time you listen).

Also make sure your speakers go at least as high as you can hear for the same reason.

So with a good DSP it is possible to compensate for the speaker FR curve, the room curve, and your personal hearing curve. However, if I understand it correctly you are saying do not attempt doing anything about your hearing curve. It is what it is and if you attempt to compensate for it the result will not sound natural and in essence make things worse.
 
diyAudio Moderator
Joined 2008
Paid Member
Once again Ben.. I don't like how I worded those parentheses, I simply meant it wouldn't sound like expected. I'm not a fan of excess treble myself.
classicalfan said:
So with a good DSP it is possible to compensate for the speaker FR curve, the room curve, and your personal hearing curve.
It sounds as though you are answering your own question here?
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.