Being somewhat hearing compromised myself, I wonder how, or if, I and persons with the same issue are effected by changes in volume? Do the Fletcher-Munson curves hold as true for us as a sixteen year old with 'perfect' hearing?
Some research:There ought to be some research on that topic.
Hearing problems - hyperacusis - Better Health ChannelHyperacusis is a type of reduced tolerance for sound. People with hyperacusis often find ordinary noises too loud.
The most common cause of hyperacusis is damage to the inner ear from ageing or exposure to loud noise. Hyperacusis is often associated with tinnitus and distortion of sounds.
Thanks for the link, I just read it. I know the popping, as it happens to my right ear when running loud sine sweeps. Now I know why! Noise bothers me more than most people, but that's allways been the case.
Maybe you know of equal loudness charts for old codgers?
Maybe you know of equal loudness charts for old codgers?
What about "Tolerance For Loud Sounds Decreases with Age"?
Tolerance For Loud Noises Decreases With Age | EurekAlert! Science News
Tolerance For Loud Noises Decreases With Age | EurekAlert! Science News
In a study comparing how young adults and senior citizens judge noise levels of rock music, Professor of Hearing and Speech Sciences Donald Fucci found that seniors rated rock music much higher on a loudness scale than younger people.
As many people age, they develop a common hearing loss condition, called presbycusis, in which hearing gradually deteriorates and certain sounds become distorted.When older people lose the high frequencies, they hear a distortion. What they hear resembles sound from an Edison phonograph more than sound from a high-quality stereo.
Try this link:Maybe you know of equal loudness charts for old codgers?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwin_tv-pqDqAhX7TRUIHYbZDcoQFjAAegQIAxAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jstage.jst.go.jp%2Farticle%2Fast%2F30%2F6%2F30_6_446%2F_pdf&usg=AOvVaw0gPEhIQ3BQu93qyzkFHb0M
Fig. 2 shows the comparison between young and older listeners. Much as you might expect.
The older listener group was less sensitive to high-frequency tones of 4,000 Hz and higher than was the young listener group. The contours of older listeners show steady growth as the frequency increases above 1,000 Hz, whereas those of young listeners distinctly show a dip at 4,000 Hz. Second, the older listener group was apparently more sensitive to low-frequency tones of 250 Hz and below than was the young listener group.
Last edited:
Good find - thanks! Wow those thresholds go up, don't they? And the 4K sensitivity takes a beatings.
On the bright side you are now perfectly qualified for cap and wire denialism 😎
But what's with the 60Hz? What makes you think you cannot hear lower frequencies?
😎😀🙂
I will make my ears measured by a ear specialist if I as the op and ask him - the specialist- what is needed for compensation - filter in mind ?-
Not being a specialist I'm not sure the last octave is a true lost, I will be more worried about notch frequencies (frequencies lost) below... Though HF is important for transcients and snaps but have no idea where is the limit needed !
Sibilance being around 6 k , triangle iirc between 6k to 8 k, I surmise transcient and snap needed for the speed feeling is up to 10 k hz max, but this is just a feeling and subjective thoughts.😱
Had tests done by professional audiologist a few years ago. And probably lost some more high frequency since then.
Problem with self testing is that you can't really depend on computer speakers to be flat at either the low or high end. Would need to have some really good headphones like the audiologists use in order to have any confidence in the results.
Problem with self testing is that you can't really depend on computer speakers to be flat at either the low or high end. Would need to have some really good headphones like the audiologists use in order to have any confidence in the results.
well the guys that test that know perfectly all about the ears, M&F and all curves and you are not biased during the test. I personally test mines every two years. that incredible with the older people how the notchs can impact the phrases and words understanding I noticed.... despite the brain makes shortcuts with several syllables to match them for the context understanding.... I assume it's more difficult with music according the spectrum (piano, claps....)
The full-range offers a narrowing directivity, which I think is interesting and can of course also be achieved in multi-way style.And that would seem to support AllenB's comment above for a preference of a multi-way over a full range speaker
Here is a good hearing test. You can do it with speakers and one earplug (I suppose I didn't have to specify "one").
Online Hearing Test & Audiogram Printout
Online Hearing Test & Audiogram Printout
Is this the 100th time I've mentioned the El Greco fallacy at this forum?
When you go to a concert, is there anything wrong with the orchestra that needs EQ? (Hint: that's a trick question.)
You need to distinguish different functions of hearing. For example, the tonal balance can seem OK whatever your personal FR plot may be (it is the FR you are living with, eh). But you might still not be able to hear the triangle. You can hear the triangle if you boost the upper treble but then the tonal balance will be off.
A discussion for another day is just what does a hearing aid do.
B.
When you go to a concert, is there anything wrong with the orchestra that needs EQ? (Hint: that's a trick question.)
You need to distinguish different functions of hearing. For example, the tonal balance can seem OK whatever your personal FR plot may be (it is the FR you are living with, eh). But you might still not be able to hear the triangle. You can hear the triangle if you boost the upper treble but then the tonal balance will be off.
A discussion for another day is just what does a hearing aid do.
B.
Last edited:
I agree Ben, don't compensate for your hearing through your speakers, otherwise it will not sound natural the way you've come to accept that natural sounds currently (Unless you feel like a trip back in time each time you listen).
Also make sure your speakers go at least as high as you can hear for the same reason.
Also make sure your speakers go at least as high as you can hear for the same reason.
I agree Ben, don't compensate for your hearing through your speakers, otherwise it will not sound natural the way you've come to accept that natural sounds currently (Unless you feel like a trip back in time each time you listen).
Also make sure your speakers go at least as high as you can hear for the same reason.
So with a good DSP it is possible to compensate for the speaker FR curve, the room curve, and your personal hearing curve. However, if I understand it correctly you are saying do not attempt doing anything about your hearing curve. It is what it is and if you attempt to compensate for it the result will not sound natural and in essence make things worse.
...(Unless you feel like a trip back in time each time you listen)...
You were doing good until that sentence. After El Greco fallacy, might as well read about Adaptation Level. Contrary to your parentheses, adding treble boost does not make it sound like "back in time". It makes it sound shrill.
B.
Once again Ben.. I don't like how I worded those parentheses, I simply meant it wouldn't sound like expected. I'm not a fan of excess treble myself.
It sounds as though you are answering your own question here?classicalfan said:So with a good DSP it is possible to compensate for the speaker FR curve, the room curve, and your personal hearing curve.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Frequency Response Match for Older Ears