Simple Passive Harsch XO Using PTT6.5 and RS28F in a Waveguide

[xrk971]

I think I may have stumbled upon the first practical all passive crossover for the Harsch XO topology, which provides a quasi-transient perfect response for a 2-way speaker. Normally the Harsch XO is only implemented in DSP because the delays required are too large to be practical.

I received my Purifi PTT6.5 woofers a few days ago as part of the GB organized by Norman Tracy. I have been thinking about what kind of speaker to make with this special driver. I was going to use either a ribbon tweeter, or fullrange and make it into a FAST with a low crossover around 1kHz. However, I have a speaker box that has been languishing for a few years since I could never finish it. I happened to have a 0.57 cu ft cabinet that I made for an RS180P and a WG300 waveguide fitted with an RS28F dome tweeter. The cabinet also was fitted with dual 6.5in passive radiators from Dayton. As a lazy person's first test, I pulled the RS180P and dropped the PTT6.5 in and it was nearly a perfect drop-in fit. The PTT6.5 OD on the bezel was just a couple of mm smaller than the RS180P. Continuing on the lazy trend, I connected the existing XO for the RS180P and an RS28F.

Surprisingly, it sounded very very good considering it's a totally different driver and 4ohms vs 8ohms. This got me motivated to really crank out a new speaker crossover to hear what this driver can do. So I setup my microphone (UMIK-1 calibrated by Cross Spectrum Labs), REW, and my new TPA3255 reference Class D amp with PFFB. Probably the only amp I have at present that can drive 4ohms (good for up to 300w+). Here is a photo of the test setup:

I began by measuring their T/S parameters with a DATS. Everything looked great and the values were within factory specs for Qts, fs, and SPL. Here is the DATS measurement:

The drivers were almost perfectly matched too - very unusual to have two drivers with an impedance curve that is near identical.

I took some frequency response FRD data with just the woofer, the tweeter, and both combined in order to figure out the acoustic center offset via acoustic interferometry to be done in Xsim. Here is a plot showing the predicted combined raw driver response with the simulated one for a 19mm offset of the tweeter relative to the woofer:

This was measured with the mic along the woofer axis (I plan to put the woofer on top and tweeter on the bottom to get a little extra time of flight delay for the tweeter while still keeping the front baffle flat), I get a 19mm offset of the tweeter and waveguide based on the interferogram match of the simulated and actual combined measurement. This is the same technique that I used on the 10F/RS225 FAST speaker in order to get time alignment. It works here even though the crossover curves are not anywhere near 1st order, but closer to what is seen on a Harsch XO with a steep 4th order low pass on the woofer and less steep 2rd order high pass on the tweeter. Furthermore, since the Purifi PTT6.5 driver has such a nice flat response out to nearly 4khz, I was able to run a high XO point of about 3.6kHz, which corresponds to a time of flight delay distance of 47.5mm (1.87in). By using the woofer as the main acoustic axis, we are able to approximately delay the tweeter by a little extra due to triangulation.

In Xsim, I modeled the following very simple crossover using only 2 inductors, 2 capacitors, and four resistors (the prototype uses multiple values from my XO development kit to build up the desired values), was able to achieve a very Harsch-like textbook XO profile. Here is the crossover schematic, as-built:

Here is a photo of the prototype crossover as implemented using my XO development kit:

Here is the predicted frequency response plot for this crossover:

Here is the predicted impedance plot for this crossover:

Here is the measured frequency response for 1/24th octave smoothing. Note the tell-tale dip in the system response relative to the woofer only response just to left of the crossover frequency. This is a classic sign that the Harsch XO was set up correctly.

The other tell-tale sign that it is a Harsch is that there is about a 55 deg phase shift bump from the nominal, and here we see a fairly flat phase response from 100Hz to 10KHz with an approximate 55 deg rise.

And finally, the clearest indication that this crossover is quasi transient perfect is the fact that the step response looks like a right triangle. Without this feature, the advantages of a transient perfect crossover are lost.

Here is the distortion associated with these measurements and although I am not using the suggested Purifi passive radiators, there is still a fairly low level of harmonic distortion.

From the measurements, we can also see that the measured group delay (GD) is excellent – under 5 milliseconds down to about 45Hz.

Edit May 21, 2020: New Polar Data (approx angles but distance of 0.5m is correct, mic on woofer axis as designed):

So what we have here is sort of like the elusive missing Chalice of XO’s: a simple quasi-transient perfect higher order XO capable of rendering clean, crisp attack notes while remaining easy to implement in a flat baffle speaker with commercially available drivers and woofers. The PTT6.5 is what makes this speaker possible.

How does it sound? I only have it in mono, but it sounds Excellent: great balance and clarity, nice midrange weight and slam, super highs and a wide sweetspot and excellent imaging provided by the waveguide! I really am impressed by how clean it sounds, and the tweeter is working where it is mostly designed for. This leaves the woofer to handle the midbass, where it loves to operate. The bass with the dual Dayton PR’s still needs work, but this is where I think a TL is going to really do a nice job.

Here is a video of this speaker playing a song that really exercises the passive radiators. I will need to make a proper TL speaker to keep the high efficiency and low distortion bass output as these passive radiators I had were running out of xmax already.

Edit May 26, 2020: Plans for TL here

Waveguide adapter plate STL file here:
Simple Passive Harsch XO Using PTT6.5 and RS28F in a Waveguide

Here is response of TL predicted by Akabak, max SPL is 101dB at 21Vrms (exceeds thermal limit), and SPL at Xdamage is 104dB:

Here are the plans for just the front baffle to make a version with a removable baffle. Remember to removed the 0.75in from the front on the side view of the main plans if going this route.
Simple Passive Harsch XO Using PTT6.5 and RS28F in a Waveguide

Here are CAD files of the TL speaker (STL and STEP):
Simple Passive Harsch XO Using PTT6.5 and RS28F in a Waveguide

Final XO board with flat copper foil inductor and Jantzen and Mills resistors:

BOM for XO here:
Simple Passive Harsch XO Using PTT6.5 and RS28F in a Waveguide

Here is measured response with new permanent XO PCB vs temporary developmental XO:

Edit May 29, 2020: The new RST28F-4 tweeter has been tested and verified to work with the WG300 waveguide and this speaker. Requires additional felt spaceer between the WG300 and the RST28F faceplate due to a larger grille diameter.

Edit June 14, 2020: Revised plans for the TL with corrected cutout dimensions for the drivers. This plan utilizes a removable front baffle which will simplify installation of the XO board, padding and stuffing. Moreover, it allows you to change the tweeter at a later time. The box can be flipped with the tweeter on top for a conventional LR2/LR4 crossover if desired.
Simple Passive Harsch XO Using PTT6.5 and RS28F in a Waveguide

EditJune 28, 2020: The completed TL speaker in BB ply for some casual listening in the kitchen:

Edit June 29, 2020: Here is the schematic showing the final parts used as shown in the photo of the XO and measurements above:

Edit Aug. 15, 2020: New revised XO for better tonal balance - more info here:

F3 of 39Hz and slight downward tilt in the response:

Final XO using Dayton Precision 1% 10W resistors, Jantzen 2.5mH 18ga coil, Dayton 0.5mH 20ga coil, Audyn Q2 22uF MKP for woofer and Dayton Precision 2.2uF MKP 250v 1% for the tweeter. I have a bypass of 0.1uF MKP Dayton as a place holder for a Miflex 0.1uF 600v bypass on the other channel.

Here is the channel with the Miflex, I will see if I can do an AB in mono one of these days:

Edit Mar 23, 2021: I have developed a floorstanding TL. More info here.

 

[pelanj]

The PTT6.5 looks like it is worth its price totally.

 

[xrk971]

Hi Pelanj,
Yes, it is a special driver unlike anything else I have. Special like the Heil AMT was when first introduced. I wonder how it sounds with a Heil AMT as true 1st order?

 

[phase_accurate]

I would have tried that crossover topology with my large MTM, but the delay of 18 cm approximately would dictate a crossover frequency around 900 Hz which is a bit high for both - my taste and my woofers.

Glad you could pull it off with such a simple (although not cheap) setup. Looks really good.


Regards


Charles

 

[xrk971]

Glad you could pull it off with such a simple (although not cheap) setup. Looks really good.

The cost of this woofer is comparable (or less) than some of the top offerings of ScanSpeak in the 7in range pricewise (ScanSpeak Illuminator 18WU/4741T-00 is $337) - so I do not see it as excessively expensive. It was you who pointed me out to the Harsch XO years ago - thank you for that!

but the delay of 18 cm approximately would dictate a crossover frequency around 900 Hz

You need a 12cm to 15cm deep waveguide. 🙂

 

[phase_accurate]

The tweeter is in a waveguide that is deeper than 20 cm in my box. 18 cm is the measured delay, taking the woofer geometry and the group delay of its intrinsic lowpass function into account. It would mean a crossover frequency of 950 Hz approximately which is too high for my setup.

Regards

Charles

 

[xrk971]

Ok, I understand now... you have a waveguie and more limiting is the lack of upper reach on the woofer to cross higher. I wonder if a Harsch 3-way could work with 4th/3rd-3rd/4th for W/M/T? or 4th/3rd-4th/3rd ?

 

[AKSA]

Brilliant, X, an exploration of speakers where I have no skill but can recognise what you have done here. And as an aside, the Scanspeak 7" is absurdly expensive now, I have a couple here, nice drivers, but to get them in Australia would be close on $USD450.

Hugh

 

[AllenB]

I've been following this idea since your earlier threads, and it's impressive to see you pushing the envelope with this.

 

[xrk971]

Thank you, Hugh and AllenB. I was real lucky with this one - it’s one of those finds that can’t be replicated with another driver.

You have SS Elipticor drivers, Hugh? What speaker is that in?

 

[xrk971]

Here is the much awaited polar data - rough eyeballed angles +/-3 deg, but distance of 0.50m is measured at each angle with a ruler. Data is shown as 6 cycle FDW to reduce effect of room boundaries and show more intrinsic behavior of the speaker. I think it looks excellent and the integration of the waveguide and 6.5in woofer is ideal with a 3.6khz crossover frequency.

Data presented here with 6 cycle FDW:

Here is same data in plain 1/24th oct smoothing with no FDW:

 

[pelanj]

These speakers reminded me this model: S400 White — Buchardt Audio

I imagine a luxury version of these with CNC'd front panel with integrated waveguide in high gloss finish and the original passive membrane. I almost bought the S400, but I did not like the sharp edges.

I wonder how would the large AMT integrate with this woofer.

 

[xrk971]

Those look nice and you are right. Even the waveguide on the bottom and passive radiators on the back. I doubt it is transient perfect or Harsch XO though. The crossover has 5 caps and 3 inductors. They look like Dayton components too.

Thanks for pointing it out though.

 

[pelanj]

Watching this forum is dangerous, I think I will need to expand my long list of future project with one compact box like this - based on your design.

 

[ErikdeBest]

Nice! For my understanding: what does the Purifi unit donin this design that could not be done by a driver like the mw16p SB Acoustics MW16P - 6.5" Mid Bass

 

[xrk971]

Hi Erik,
The Satori is perhaps one of the best 6.5in mid bass ever made. I don’t have one, yet. It might work in this configuration - I don’t know, but I think its response might take a few more components to get as smoothly rolled off. I think the main thing about the PTT6.5 is it’s ultra low distortion - it’s similar or even better than a dedicated midrange like a class leading 10F/8424 over the 1k to 4K range, plus it has 10m Xmax. This pumps a lot more air.

PTT6.5:

Satori:

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

 

[wilbur-x]

We managed for a MTM to smooth the Satori-bump at 1khz by passive components. (Google "WVT høyttaler" )
Now Troels tamed and smoothed Satori by edge-coating (and other lo-mids) with a "secret" glue. I discussed that case with member "Rallyfinnen".
We might try a strong flexible glue meant for book binding. (Danafix).
I am really exited to watch XRK's experience with Purify in a transmission line. In addition to temper the bass, the rear wave reflex will be attenuated. Dangerous reading indeed !

 

[picowallspeaker]

These speakers reminded me this model: S400 White — Buchardt Audio

These reminded the SF...
Diffusore Acustico Special Edition Ex3ma | Sonus faber

 

[454Casull]

Good stuff!

What does the Purifi woofer have that enabled the all-passive Harsch XO, that the Dayton woofer does not and therefore could not? Just that the response is usable to a higher frequency?

 

[xrk971]

PTT6.5 has an absolute lack of breakup anomalies in the higher frequencies so no extra filtering or notch filters needed, plus a wide bandwidth and low distortion that allows it to work as an excellent midrange.

If you look at the factory response curve below, the woofer looks like it has a natural electronic low pass filter / DSP applied. But that’s just the natural roll-off.

Let’s compare to the grand daddy of all high end mids - the VM752 soft dome:

An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

Except for not having 94dB sensitivity, PTT6.5 is flatter and goes even higher?:

Let’s compare to the response of the RS180P that I measured in same box:

There’s a huge 16dB (from ideal falloff baseline) hump at 6kHz that has to be dealt with. There is a 2kHz bell mode ringing distortion at 2kHz that grows rapidly with SPL.