Next year provided data could be more comprehensive supporting simulation to full space. Negative side is that designs optimized also to full space will be close to equal because knowledge of power and DI responses reduces amount of possible results quite radically.
This scope with XSim and axial data only is really narrow and won't be enough in practice. Competition is that which guess the judge feels the best, though it shouldn't be like that after beginner phase.
This scope with XSim and axial data only is really narrow and won't be enough in practice. Competition is that which guess the judge feels the best, though it shouldn't be like that after beginner phase.
ok all,
First try. Haven't looked at the original link yet (doing that right now). Feel free to pick this apart lol as I don't do passive crossovers. I was worried about R3 and R2 getting warm but they can probably be collapsed into 1 resistor of 7.5R. As you can see vary basic topology. Crossover frequency might be too low, depends on how loud you listen?
This was fun! Cheers!
First try. Haven't looked at the original link yet (doing that right now). Feel free to pick this apart lol as I don't do passive crossovers. I was worried about R3 and R2 getting warm but they can probably be collapsed into 1 resistor of 7.5R. As you can see vary basic topology. Crossover frequency might be too low, depends on how loud you listen?
This was fun! Cheers!
Attachments
Kimmosto, feel free to submit a more advanced challenge yourself.
Challenge part I could be: Create measurement data for full space simulation. File format: LspCAD 6 extended data. Drivers: X and Y.
Part II: Design crossover.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.