I saw that but i consider those measurements weird. Measuring level is too low to be able to see the distortion profile. It should better be presented as percentage, not like that. Frequency response should be measured raw. If that is raw, then it measures nothing like in SB datasheet and that is weird given that SB frequency measurements are quite good.
There's no need for your bad attitude. We're talking, right ?
There's no need for your bad attitude. We're talking, right ?
Last edited:
Thanks for measurements.
I don't really know what did they try to achieve with this driver. It doesn't have a metal cone but measures like it does. I wouldn't mind peak in distortion if it had stellar distortion under 4kHz which could make it a good midrange in a threeway, but distortion is quite average.
Peerless TG9 (although not black cone) is a lot better driver.
I don't really know what did they try to achieve with this driver. It doesn't have a metal cone but measures like it does. I wouldn't mind peak in distortion if it had stellar distortion under 4kHz which could make it a good midrange in a threeway, but distortion is quite average.
Peerless TG9 (although not black cone) is a lot better driver.
Last edited:
Yeah, a bit odd - I actually have a couple of these coming ,but those results aren't quite what I was hoping to see. I wonder whether a notch on the break-up will help with the amplified distortion products at all. If you have to notch that 4k resonance in the waterfall, it's not going to be a particularly useful driver. Definitely not the 'poor man's 10F' I thought it might be.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.