snubbers
Not really for the oscillations. The transformer secondaries have an associated inductance that forms a nice LC circuit with the winding capacitance. Abrupt changes in current, as you experience when the bridge diodes shut off, causes this circuit to ring and radiate. Adding the snubber circuit will suppress this. I can't guarantee that this will get rid of your problem. It is one source. Knock them down one at a time.
Not really for the oscillations. The transformer secondaries have an associated inductance that forms a nice LC circuit with the winding capacitance. Abrupt changes in current, as you experience when the bridge diodes shut off, causes this circuit to ring and radiate. Adding the snubber circuit will suppress this. I can't guarantee that this will get rid of your problem. It is one source. Knock them down one at a time.
sounds like a plan, gonna redesign the entire power supply section anyways. Learn by doing it wrong the first time🙂
power supply redesign
I learned some things from the supply used in the WHAMMY headphone amp. Wayne used a C-R-C-R-C filter network that does a pretty good job of reducing the ripple. Each C is 3300uF and the series R between caps is 5.1 ohms. Nothing really magic about the values. That amp idles at about 60 mA per channel in the output stage so it draws roughly 125mA through 10 ohms for a loss of around 1.5 volts. Consider it.
I learned some things from the supply used in the WHAMMY headphone amp. Wayne used a C-R-C-R-C filter network that does a pretty good job of reducing the ripple. Each C is 3300uF and the series R between caps is 5.1 ohms. Nothing really magic about the values. That amp idles at about 60 mA per channel in the output stage so it draws roughly 125mA through 10 ohms for a loss of around 1.5 volts. Consider it.
Yes I will. i use a similar approach for pre amp/active volume control board. Although only two stages. Would you not need some seriously large wattage resistors for a +65 G -65 supply at 15 amps max current draw?
resistances
Well, I would look at the expected quiescent current draw. Decide what a reasonable voltage drop across the resistor might be, say 2 volts. Calculate the necessary power rating and double that number. If the resistors are to be mounted on a PC board just make sure they are away from the board surface a bit because they may get hot.
Well, I would look at the expected quiescent current draw. Decide what a reasonable voltage drop across the resistor might be, say 2 volts. Calculate the necessary power rating and double that number. If the resistors are to be mounted on a PC board just make sure they are away from the board surface a bit because they may get hot.
to clarify in removing the tranny the level control was also removed. the input is directly connected to ipod on battery and volume is controlled by ipod
Are the chips wired up exactly as per the data sheet , you have not missed anything out or made a connection where the wire is shown as just crossing another wire ?.
Just a suggestion... have you eliminated possible simple causes already e.g. tried different signal sources, internal and external cables etc? I guess if the problem is the same on both channels it suggests a design problem but I’ve wasted hours in the past swapping over components only to track the problem down to a dodgy cable or dry joint. Could just be that I’m particularly bad at soldering and making up interconnects though.
So what is the input resistance of the amp inputs ?.to clarify in removing the tranny the level control was also removed. the input is directly connected to ipod on battery and volume is controlled by ipod
Dan.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Chip Amps
- zobel net question.