Welcome to the animal farm freak show 2030
The direction the food industry have been steered towards seems to be part of a broader spectrum soft-kill eugenics including drugs, climate change, social engineering, 4th industrial revolution etc etc.
Stay informed and we will become the new future generation, the rest of the zombified useless eaters fully occupied with their "life" in a pocket device will be culled of, and the rest of the surviving "usefull idiots" will be sent to the Sovkhozes.
😎
The direction the food industry have been steered towards seems to be part of a broader spectrum soft-kill eugenics including drugs, climate change, social engineering, 4th industrial revolution etc etc.
Stay informed and we will become the new future generation, the rest of the zombified useless eaters fully occupied with their "life" in a pocket device will be culled of, and the rest of the surviving "usefull idiots" will be sent to the Sovkhozes.
😎
Protecting clean water, and even inventing ways to clean rivers etc may be a saving grace.
There is a lot of evidence supporting non-industrialized water as being a lost component to health because of the bacteria and such in it.
There is a lot of evidence supporting non-industrialized water as being a lost component to health because of the bacteria and such in it.
The direction the food industry have been steered towards seems to be part of a broader spectrum soft-kill eugenics
What an uplifting post, I have a few 1930's texts on eugenics it was taken very seriously the Thule society would have been chief proponents. If anyone thinks what is going on now is bad what was going on 100 yr. ago was pure insanity.
Last edited:
I do.No one else finds it humorous the article puts Cheerios, Ritz Crackers, and Oreos on the food side of the food/poison boundary?
Threads like this are good so I can add to the ignore list.
Dont eat riblits. This is based on a true story https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvvPid3dS_Y
Last edited:
That looks excellent, I'm all for local in all (practical) respects. Local is accused of being inefficient, inefficient for who?
I do not know.
The companies that own the supermarkets? The companies that own the centralized warehouses? The freight companies? The oil business selling fuel to the freight companies? The companies building the supermarkets and warehouses? The companies selling trucks and possibly forklifts to all of the above? The companies previously selling weed killers and seeds to the farmers that are refusing to use their products?
If you find out, I really would like to know who actually makes money, it sure isn't any of the farmers, or the people working on the floor in any of those companies, someone must be "skimming the cream" as we say. Maybe the Companies charging rent and lease of facilities to all the other companies?
We get seasonally local foods in a couple of grocery store chains, but by and large most is shipped in.
Local is nice when in season, but the reality is that people want a wide variety of foods all year long.
This can not be supplied locally.
Local is nice when in season, but the reality is that people want a wide variety of foods all year long.
This can not be supplied locally.
May be mass production of industrialized food is the response of Morher Nature to over-population? Such a feedback that eliminates over-growth...
May be mass production of industrialized food is the response of Morher Nature
to over-population? Such a feedback that eliminates over-growth...
Maybe so, certainly something will stop our exponential growth.
Like bacteria in a Petri dish, our resources are limited.
yes its quite bad!!!Zero D said:It's even worse than i already knew 😡 Pass it on 😉
gmo crap and alot of it gives me stomach problems!!!!
We get seasonally local foods in a couple of grocery store chains, but by and large most is shipped in.
Local is nice when in season, but the reality is that people want a wide variety of foods all year long.
This can not be supplied locally.
Thats a little surprising. From spring into fall we get massive flood of locally grown foods. During off season a lot of its grown indoors hydroponically, and whats cold stored makes it into market, until quality drops off too far.
Then whats shipped in "fresh" from places like California, the Mexico's and Florida. A smaller percentage comes from deeper parts of the South America's, but thats limited mostly to citrus and pears.
I would of thought the U.S would be pretty self sufficient with the larger agricultural states able to grow through winter also having the option of growing indoors during cold months.
Last edited:
Maybe so, certainly something will stop our exponential growth.
Like bacteria in a Petri dish, our resources are limited.
Yes, we have an unhealthy obsession with growth, (well, polytricksians and egonomists do 😉) any percentage growth is exponential, it's another collective madness, shows how little they (we) really have to offer?
The problem with growth is an isolation of the self with the whole. At an individual level, there is little difference between having two children (my choice) and having say four children (My parents choice).
At a global level the difference is what is causing the exponential growth. The family size in first world countries has seen a continuous shift downward over the last 100 years. This is not the case in less developed societies. A lot has to do with education.
I don't see any global conspiracy between agrabusiness, Pesticide/herbacide companies, fertalizer companies, etc. Rather it is simplay the evolution of more efficient farming.
100 years ago big farms relied on Bat Guano for fertalizer, with the depleation of the sources it was logical for chemical replacements during the industrial revolution. Pesticides are an additional logical evolution.
Without industrial farming it would not be possible to support the current world population, which will continue to increase until we have either a man made disaster of global proportions, or a natural disaster of epic proportions.
At a global level the difference is what is causing the exponential growth. The family size in first world countries has seen a continuous shift downward over the last 100 years. This is not the case in less developed societies. A lot has to do with education.
I don't see any global conspiracy between agrabusiness, Pesticide/herbacide companies, fertalizer companies, etc. Rather it is simplay the evolution of more efficient farming.
100 years ago big farms relied on Bat Guano for fertalizer, with the depleation of the sources it was logical for chemical replacements during the industrial revolution. Pesticides are an additional logical evolution.
Without industrial farming it would not be possible to support the current world population, which will continue to increase until we have either a man made disaster of global proportions, or a natural disaster of epic proportions.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- Your food is TOXIC !