Go to this thread.
http://www.audioheritage.org/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=61627&postcount=318
I don't work for Passlabs (yet) but I will always support and believe in a product that sells itself.
The people behind the product are of course what makes it a star.
Macka
http://www.audioheritage.org/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=61627&postcount=318
I don't work for Passlabs (yet) but I will always support and believe in a product that sells itself.
The people behind the product are of course what makes it a star.
Macka
Attachments
Hello, mate...nice to see you back.
You gotta let that X250 breathe and release steam...under that table with another component on top of it? Bring it out of the cave and show it off, man!
You gotta let that X250 breathe and release steam...under that table with another component on top of it? Bring it out of the cave and show it off, man!
Member
Joined 2002
macka said:
True, i was looking at the dame, not the Doctor.
Nice lady, nice motor, but "Who" is the fag with the cape ?
Neslon ? Blasphemy !!!
The X250 ain't mine, it belongs to a customer in Ca I am assisting.
The Story........
I am currently building an external Hi End Passive crossover for the mid/horn and slot using Auricaps (very nice). My friend is biamping with the Passlabs X250 on the woofer and a Mac 150 on the mids and highs. On my recommendation he removed the Ashley crossover to see how the X250 would perform in full passive operation.
He just emailed me to say he is in the market for another X250. He might want a better crossover too.
Am I a good salesman or what!
Dr Who is a worthy avatar and the best bit is the Tardis is dimensionally transendentant....Nelson will understand....LOL
http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/index.shtml
Macka
The Story........
I am currently building an external Hi End Passive crossover for the mid/horn and slot using Auricaps (very nice). My friend is biamping with the Passlabs X250 on the woofer and a Mac 150 on the mids and highs. On my recommendation he removed the Ashley crossover to see how the X250 would perform in full passive operation.
He just emailed me to say he is in the market for another X250. He might want a better crossover too.
Am I a good salesman or what!
Dr Who is a worthy avatar and the best bit is the Tardis is dimensionally transendentant....Nelson will understand....LOL
http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/index.shtml
Macka
It doesnt take a good salesman, to sell a Pass Labs product😀 😀 😀 The ears of the beholder, is the trigger😉
Steen😎
The regular X product is class AB. You can't fry eggs on it unless you've been playing it hard.
Grey
Grey
Yep, I kind of forgot the fact that the "X" class is A/B
I am not sure that the placing of that X250 is the best, though😉 Normally, NP's amps, runs hot like hell😱 Steen😎
From Macka's link:
"Further details of this evaluation will be discussed in a project. I must get Neslon Pass to view this thread!"
First you must spell the name right.
😎
"Further details of this evaluation will be discussed in a project. I must get Neslon Pass to view this thread!"
First you must spell the name right.
😎
Nelson Pass said:
Oops,
That's what happens when you start typing in the "dark"
We'll fix that typo Master.
Macka
Last edited by a moderator:
Whenever we get a lousy review, we always pop the champagne
and shout, "They spelled the name right!"
and shout, "They spelled the name right!"
Well this time it was a good review and the name got spelt right.Nelson Pass said:
Where's the champagne? Might be time to update the list here 404 Not Found
Macka
http://www.audioheritage.org/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=61627&postcount=318
Hi, Ian. I rerouted everything so that I'm now going directly from the balanced outs on the preamp to the balanced inputs on the Pass Labs X250.
Here's my impressions:
-the midrange and everything above seems to have more presence (I guesssome people might call this better soundstage).. It could be that's it's a
better balance (between lows and highs) than what the bi-amp setup wasgiving me. Seems to be more alive. I'd have to say it sounds a little
better. It could also be a real possibility that the McIntosh 150 was nota good power match. Perhaps the Mac veiled the uppers slightly.
-To present an analogy, with the bi-amp setup it sounded like there was someone or something in between me and the speaker. I could still hear the
speakers fine. But now, powered only with the Pass and going all passive it's as if that obstruction has moved out of the way. Maybe not quite so
dramatic, but I do notice a difference.
-there seems to be better separation between the channels. Could be just because there's better clarity in the Mids and on up.
Yes less is more but it just reconfirmed that one of my next upgrades needs to be to replace the McIntosh for another Pass X250. I'm always looking
for more.
Last edited by a moderator:
Marcello
Marcello
It seems to happen often.In the last (June 2005) issue of the Italian Hi-Fi magazine "Suono", in the X250.5 review [do you know?! ;-)] Peter Walker of Quad became "Peter Walzer", a sort of dance... :-(
Marcello
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator:
Suono N.381
Yes but they closed the article with a simple " Grazie Nelson." He only cares that they spelled his name correctly. The publishers photographs of the product are some of the best I have ever seen.... I can almost hear Nelson saying, "What's not to like!"
Cyclotronguy
Yes but they closed the article with a simple " Grazie Nelson." He only cares that they spelled his name correctly. The publishers photographs of the product are some of the best I have ever seen.... I can almost hear Nelson saying, "What's not to like!"
Cyclotronguy
Last edited by a moderator:
It looked like a great review, but then I don't read Italianvery well. If it was a bad review, don't tell me.tortello said:
😎
Last edited by a moderator:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.