Well it is quite the cabinet, backed up by a large group of dedicated employees that need to get paid and have health insurance etc. The cabinet includes all that and more running a company isn't cheap. As a DIY community we just see cost of parts, as a business owner/partner you see much more.
On the other hand for that money I could buy ATC SCM300A SL PROs.
Granted the cabs are not as flash but it includes $15k worth of amplifiers.
I know which I'd choose.
..the midrange actually sb acoustics SATORI..
..update:
From the reflection in Wilson Audio's driver pic., it's NOT the SB Acoustics Satori.
The Satori is a neo motor; Wilson's Alexia mid. is a ferrite motor with a bucking magnet:
Attachments
yep i noticed that too, as wilson's uses double ferrite magnets. cone is similar, but the frame is definitely different, reminds me of scanspeak frame, especially the screw holes (although joachim suggested that it looked like SEAS)
..update:
From the reflection in Wilson Audio's driver pic., it's NOT the SB Acoustics Satori.
The Satori is a neo motor; Wilson's Alexia mid. is a ferrite motor with a bucking magnet:
why does it say egyptian papyrus?
Yes, that could be done. But you need the original to measure it firstly.
Build a similar enclosure, measure the individual filtered-in-box driver SPL responses and use these response as "target" responses. Import the target responses in a DSP crossover, measure the raw in-box-drivers,import the measurements, and have the DSP to calculare such a filter ch\racteristic that driver+filter are exact replicas of the Wilsons. Actually a piece of cake for a decent DSP given proper software. LspCAD 6.1 can do it.
If MiniDSP would have slightly more advanced software that could import target curves, it could even be implemented with MiniDSP. Maybe Mini DSP had advanced that far.
Kind Regards,
Eelco
Build a similar enclosure, measure the individual filtered-in-box driver SPL responses and use these response as "target" responses. Import the target responses in a DSP crossover, measure the raw in-box-drivers,import the measurements, and have the DSP to calculare such a filter ch\racteristic that driver+filter are exact replicas of the Wilsons. Actually a piece of cake for a decent DSP given proper software. LspCAD 6.1 can do it.
If MiniDSP would have slightly more advanced software that could import target curves, it could even be implemented with MiniDSP. Maybe Mini DSP had advanced that far.
Kind Regards,
Eelco
why does it say egyptian papyrus?
Because that's what it says!
Maybe it where the papyrus was harvested!
Papyrus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
On the other hand for that money I could buy ATC SCM300A SL PROs.
Granted the cabs are not as flash but it includes $15k worth of amplifiers.
I know which I'd choose.
+1
Who cares what cabs look like, its the noise that counts.
Papyrus fiber properties might be close to hemp fiber?
To some people papyrus means nicer associations than hemp 🙂
To some people papyrus means nicer associations than hemp 🙂
Can someone here build a similar Alexia for less money? ...And that sounds similar too.
Got no idea if they sound the same, most probably not. But look very similar.
check out Troels ATS-4
Got no idea if they sound the same, most probably not. But look very similar.
check out Troels ATS-4
Thanks a bunch. Do you know roughly the total cost?
Yes, that could be done. But you need the original to measure it firstly.
Build a similar enclosure, measure the individual filtered-in-box driver SPL responses and use these response as "target" responses. Import the target responses in a DSP crossover, measure the raw in-box-drivers,import the measurements, and have the DSP to calculare such a filter ch\racteristic that driver+filter are exact replicas of the Wilsons. Actually a piece of cake for a decent DSP given proper software. LspCAD 6.1 can do it.
If MiniDSP would have slightly more advanced software that could import target curves, it could even be implemented with MiniDSP. Maybe Mini DSP had advanced that far.
Kind Regards,
Eelco
I guess it can easily be done just like you said, by someone of the right caliber.
My question: The Alexias cost $48,500/pair USA dollars (MSRP), how much for the "3D" version? ...Roughly.
To some people papyrus means nicer associations than hemp 🙂
To whom? The ancient Egyptians?
which would be technically and probably sound better?..update:
From the reflection in Wilson Audio's driver pic., it's NOT the SB Acoustics Satori.
The Satori is a neo motor; Wilson's Alexia mid. is a ferrite motor with a bucking magnet:
Mid looks like my Typhany 8" subs, which are wood fiber.
Peerless by Tymphany NE149W-08 5-1/4" Fiber Cone Woofer Speaker 8 Ohm
Also heard Wilson's use an unmodified tweeter from vifa, now Tymphany, that costs $20 in their larger models. I don't have a source, so don't quote me.
Vince
Peerless by Tymphany NE149W-08 5-1/4" Fiber Cone Woofer Speaker 8 Ohm
Also heard Wilson's use an unmodified tweeter from vifa, now Tymphany, that costs $20 in their larger models. I don't have a source, so don't quote me.
Vince
Last edited:
Which is also rather similar to the Vifa D27. I can't believe Wilson would spend that much money on a tweeter......hahahah. 🙂
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- Wilson's new $48,500 Alexia