Wilson Watt Clones(ish)

Is there any chance of evaluating x/o parts for value ( uF, ohms, mH)?
To me it does not seem like a keeper, although I could be wrong.
The mess is telling us nothing about schematic.

The thicker wires used as a measure of design improvement are nonsense.
They produce issues, solving nothing, other than appearances.
The damping wool quality is good, placed wrongly for a vented application.

I would take everything apart, clean the mess on x/o, measure parts values,
make a new board, modify schematic for better sound, make room for new port.
 
The shape is very cool, I find this cabinet very well built, I wisch I was able to make the same... but the surface finish is ugly as the stands color in that mix. Paint the cabinet in white or black with a front plate in black fabric with the stands in blacks and it should pass the WAF. All black also is less obstructive in a room.
,
It certainly a good idea to construct the bass cabinet though if not huge (WAF contect), i.e. not tooo much deep.
 
I’m starting to wonder if these were some elaborate plan to deceive potential buyers
Not sure why they felt the need to cover the components in chemical metal ( bondo )



View attachment 1153250
I suspect the maker feared of the vibrations, and that should be the cure for stopping It. Sort of a condom...
To fulfill his/her program, he/She should Just have used the binding posts as prolongation of driver 's terminals and put the crossover external.
Mid way should be the best, keeping the bi(tri-) wiring till the amplifier.

Many brand put the crossover in a pot and cover with resin
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheFinisher