Yes, lets keep the filter. And maybe this discussion is OT - thread owner to protest! 🙂
TA: No not really, once the signal has ben D/A converted it is vulnerable... I would like to stay in PCM as long as possible. My red box suggestion is; digital in - analogue out (power that is like 2 ohm / 10A). Goal: Total length of analogue path < 15 cm.
//
PS: I regard PWM as analog.
TA: No not really, once the signal has ben D/A converted it is vulnerable... I would like to stay in PCM as long as possible. My red box suggestion is; digital in - analogue out (power that is like 2 ohm / 10A). Goal: Total length of analogue path < 15 cm.
//
PS: I regard PWM as analog.
Last edited:
But maybe pwm_over_toslink can work also... never thought about that... then all control can stay centrally - thats an advantage.
I mean if you move the green box into the blue 🙂
//
I mean if you move the green box into the blue 🙂
//
I agree - PWM is Analog!
Therefore the green box is close to the red one - the green box uses the pcm data or digital data or binary data and generates up to 8ch pwm (which allow to connect up to 8 red boxes). therefore it is where it is.
I also keep my filters in - but as said there is some flexibility which mosfet component to use one could play with that easily.
We are starting to discuss a detailed architectural conept, wo we should change to a new thread - I'm new to this forum (and still exploring what is already there) so I probably cannot open a new thread.
Therefore the green box is close to the red one - the green box uses the pcm data or digital data or binary data and generates up to 8ch pwm (which allow to connect up to 8 red boxes). therefore it is where it is.
I also keep my filters in - but as said there is some flexibility which mosfet component to use one could play with that easily.
We are starting to discuss a detailed architectural conept, wo we should change to a new thread - I'm new to this forum (and still exploring what is already there) so I probably cannot open a new thread.
May I ask the OT posts to be moved here please:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/ever...-function-topology-adventure.html#post4637353
and apology to the thread starter - I was carried away, sorry!
//
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/ever...-function-topology-adventure.html#post4637353
and apology to the thread starter - I was carried away, sorry!
//
A while ago we designed such a "direct digital amp" (electronic) for a customer using I2S audio data interface. System includes one board with TI's PWM modulator DSP and up to 8 power stage boards - this gives flexibility to use any number of channels (up to 8) for stereo/multichannel/bridged mono/active loudspeakers... with one interface board.
Power stages from TI are available with different ratings and due to the modularity it is easy to modify for high-end or multichannel, for small form factor, high or low power or for any other specific request. Hand wiring the demodulators or custom made demodulator inductors or industrial coils offer a huge range of flexibility there.
Audio relevant electronic was galvanically isolated (also I2C) and we used a beagleboard black to control the unit through simple software (which gives a lot of flexibility and can be replaced by whatever you want).
System audio interface accepts I2S which can be the output of any TOSLINK/Spdif/DAC converter (we never used the BBB's real time PRUS to generate the I2S but this potentially allows a perfect I2S output, externally clocked)
If there is interest to set up such a family of electronic boards for the DIY market post here. The DSP has a lot of SMD so we need a minimum quantity to produce it with little cost, the power stages can be small boards with SMD components populated and the - audio relevant - demodulator can be done by everyone's own flavor.
Yes please! TAS5548 and TAS5614, 8 channels in/out. No need for DSP, I will use MiniDSP. I2S input of course!
Cheers,
Mike
A while ago we designed such a "direct digital amp" (electronic) for a customer using I2S audio data interface. System includes one board with TI's PWM modulator DSP and up to 8 power stage boards - this gives flexibility to use any number of channels (up to 8) for stereo/multichannel/bridged mono/active loudspeakers... with one interface board.
Power stages from TI are available with different ratings and due to the modularity it is easy to modify for high-end or multichannel, for small form factor, high or low power or for any other specific request. Hand wiring the demodulators or custom made demodulator inductors or industrial coils offer a huge range of flexibility there.
Audio relevant electronic was galvanically isolated (also I2C) and we used a beagleboard black to control the unit through simple software (which gives a lot of flexibility and can be replaced by whatever you want).
System audio interface accepts I2S which can be the output of any TOSLINK/Spdif/DAC converter (we never used the BBB's real time PRUS to generate the I2S but this potentially allows a perfect I2S output, externally clocked)
If there is interest to set up such a family of electronic boards for the DIY market post here. The DSP has a lot of SMD so we need a minimum quantity to produce it with little cost, the power stages can be small boards with SMD components populated and the - audio relevant - demodulator can be done by everyone's own flavor.
I would be very interested in something like this for an active crossover system. Optimized for sound quality over price. I would need 125+ watts/channel into 8 ohms and 200+ into 4 ohms for my 3-way speakers. I'm more interested in minimizing signal conversions than minimizing the length of analog wire, so I2S input -> PWM for all DSP processing and amplification -> speaker outs. Would this be possible?
Last edited:
Hi Guys
Very interested, but much of the comments above my understanding.
But I think I am interested.
Yes I would like an amp that takes digital from my PC and then amplifes this and sent to my speakers - without a DAC.....
Is this the correct understanding?
Very interested, but much of the comments above my understanding.
But I think I am interested.
Yes I would like an amp that takes digital from my PC and then amplifes this and sent to my speakers - without a DAC.....
Is this the correct understanding?
Hi Guys
Very interested, but much of the comments above my understanding.
But I think I am interested.
Yes I would like an amp that takes digital from my PC and then amplifes this and sent to my speakers - without a DAC.....
Is this the correct understanding?
I did it. I have a penny SA-XR55. It's awesome.
My chain is mackintosh -> pro fire 610 -> coax -> SA-XR55 -> DIY Loudspeaker based on eminence 102b the same of ZU audio speaker.
The sound is incredible
Some direct digital amps adjust volume by adjusting power at the output.
Tact is doing the volume control by controlling the PSU voltage - no digital volume control in this amplifer.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Class D
- Why so few direct digital amps?