3585 appreciation society, I agree. Mine is an "A", you have a "B" model. Do you know what the difference is Suzy?
Today there are several good semiconductor companies making SOI (Silicon On Insulator) chips. The "I" is usually silicon carbide, or even glass. Sapphire doesn't seem to be in the recipe. These chips are very fast.
That's what I have noticed with other HP instruments as for the difference between an A and B version. The 8901A and B have larger differences than that. I wish my 8901A was a B series!The differences between the A and B model of some pieces of HP gear is simply the CPU chip and associated firmware. The CPU cards are different, and usually not compatible between A and B. I think the power supplies are different as well, due to the different voltage requirements for SOS.
I have wanted to play with an 8903A or B. It would have to be cheap or not working for that to take place.I believe the same issue occurs with the 8903A VS 8903B. I got two dead 8903A's cheap, both dead. One had a dead CPU board, the other a dead input board. I made one good unit from the pair, saved the spare cards and scrapped the uglier of the two cases. I have needed to replace two more cards with spares in the 20 years I have been using the instrument.
Yes, that's probably the one I was talking about. I also agree that the 3585 seems to be more popular, but there isn't any shortages of 3577's out there either. I don't understand why they don't already have something for the 3585 yet. Maybe it's in the works. Just a time thing.There's a fella on EBay who sells an LCD replacement screen which works for the HP3577. I would imagine that the 3585A/B was an even more popular instrument warranting an LCD replacement.
Peregrine semiconductor....you can make really wonderful filters and high isolation switches in it.
have wanted to play with an 8903A or B. It would have to be cheap or not working for that to take place.
I'll second that! Doing any kind of construction on a clean bench results in an extremely filthy bench! You need vacuum cleaners and sometimes solvents to clean up those messes.Its almost too clean to do any development work.
This bench isn't used for construction so it can stay clean during a project such as comparing a variety of communications headsets.
As far as the HATS - yes they're really expensive. I know I am insane, but not THAT insane.
I started this project thinking something like: "how hard can it be to test headsets. Just get a dummy head and put a microphone in his ear."
Then I learned about Zwislocki, IEC60318, and so-on. OK - so it's complicated.
I looked high and low for an affordable solution (still looking). I did stumble on this 4128C for (sort-of) cheap - the catch is - all I got is an empty shell.
I have no idea what B&K actually puts in there. I could never find any detailed images, only a couple drawings in their literature. So I did the best I could. First I created an artificial mouth. That's not too hard. You can verify that with a measurement microphone placed in the correct location.
The ears are a different matter. I decided to create two sets of couplers. One is the simple microphone at the ear entrance - that makes the HATS somewhat like the B&K4100D.
I really couldn't find enough detail on the IEC coupler so I made a pair that approximate the XD-1053.
Here's what the inside of his head looks like:
Great benchtop multimeter obsession.
Hey Kevin,
What is that CD player you have there front and centre?
<snip>
-Chris