What to use instead of Sn62Pb36Ag2 ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Hi !

i am starting again to solder
I have some extremely good experience with the alloy 62Sn36Pb2Ag
I found this very very easy to use.
Now i understand that Pb is allowed no more for safety reasons.
I am really bad at solder.
Is there any alloy easy to use like the one mentioned ?
Or it would be better to stick with it and maybe put a mask on ?
Thanks a lot and kind regards, gino
 
Don't worry about it, as long as you don't do something stupid like eat the solder everything should be OK.

I still use 63Sn/37Pb solder and will be doing so as long as it is available.

I can solder just fine with crappy lead free solders available but I much prefer the good old Pb based solders.
 
Don't worry about it, as long as you don't do something stupid like eat the solder everything should be OK.
I still use 63Sn/37Pb solder and will be doing so as long as it is available.
I can solder just fine with crappy lead free solders available but I much prefer the good old Pb based solders

Hi and thanks for the valuable advice
That alloy is fantastic ... i have a very heavy hand and still i do not remember a single cold joint 😱
I think it is due to the low melting point ...
I will try to buy some more
Thanks again. Regards, gino
 
Hi and thanks for the valuable advice
That alloy is fantastic ... i have a very heavy hand and still i do not remember a single cold joint 😱
I think it is due to the low melting point ...
I will try to buy some more
Thanks again. Regards, gino

You are right, it is almost impossible to get a cold solder joint with something like 63Sn/37Pb and similar lead solders.

From wikipedia :

The 63/37 is a eutectic alloy, which:

1. has the lowest melting point (183 °C or 361.4 °F) of all the tin/lead alloys; and
2. the melting point is truly a point — not a range.
 
You are right, it is almost impossible to get a cold solder joint with something like 63Sn/37Pb and similar lead solders.
From wikipedia :
The 63/37 is a eutectic alloy, which:
1. has the lowest melting point (183 °C or 361.4 °F) of all the tin/lead alloys; and
2. the melting point is truly a point — not a range.

Thanks a lot again and i have bought actually a cheap 63/37
Maybe i should have gone with a better brand
But for the fine work i have also bought this one ...

Solder Wire 62 36 2 179°C 250g MPN DLMP26 250g Reel Multicore Solder | eBay

I am not exaggerating when i say that i have very very poor soldering skills
But with this one even a hot knife is enough ...
But i will try also the 63/37 ... it is quite cheaper in the end
Thanks again, gino
 
Don't settle for less than 4% silver.

Hi and thanks for the advice.
Are you thinking of a special alloy ? is it very expensive ?
Already the 2% Ag is expensive.
I know that it works fine because it is what i have used.
I guess that 4% of Ag is going to cost a lot.
But could i could use the good one for delicate operations and the 60/40 or 63/37 for points were currents are bigger ?
That could be a good compromise
Kind regards, gino
 
Already the 2% Ag is expensive.
I know that it works fine because it is what i have used.
I guess that 4% of Ag is going to cost a lot.
But could i could use the good one for delicate operations and the 60/40 or 63/37 for points were currents are bigger ?
That could be a good compromise
Kind regards, gino

Expensive, maybe, but it gives you a nice warm feeling inside every time you solder with a tiny bit of silver.
Stick with what you know!
 
Hi and thanks again
To make some practice i will start with recapping some old units
I have already bought an electrical desoldering pump
Problem is that often commercial units have a pcb quality not even comparable to diy projects i am seeing here ... how can it be that ? Who is the professionals ?
To get the same quality we have to go with high end units, and ubelievably high prices.
Anyway this is the situation
Thanks again, gino
 
Andersonix said:
Expensive, maybe, but it gives you a nice warm feeling inside every time you solder with a tiny bit of silver.
Ah, now I know why silver-containing solder is popular in certain quarters. I knew it didn't actually make better joints - it might make worse joints in some cases of the iron is not hot enough.

ginetto61 said:
Problem is that often commercial units have a pcb quality not even comparable to diy projects i am seeing here ... how can it be that ?
Over-egging the pudding is a common DIY practice. Sometimes it is by way of compensation for lack of actual circuit understanding. Someone who understand cars will tune his engine; someone who does not will add 'go-faster' stripes and a loud sound system.
 
... Over-egging the pudding is a common DIY practice. Sometimes it is by way of compensation for lack of actual circuit understanding.
Someone who understand cars will tune his engine; someone who does not will add 'go-faster' stripes and a loud sound system

Hi i was referring in particular to double sided pcb through hole or i do not know how they are called. I like those very much indeed because the component is soldered on both faces.
I also like a little wider copper traces.
And i see some PCB for diy projects so much better realized than also quite expensive commercial units.
For me it is unbelievable. The build quality of the pcb is important ... i think.
Thanks again, gino
 
Double-sided PCB has no audio advantages over single-sided PCB - it just makes the layout look a bit neater as you need no wire links. Easier to make in a factory; harder to make at home. No difference whatsoever to sound. This assumes analogue - digital circuits have quite different requirements and multi-layer might help.

The build quality of the PCB is only important in the sense that you want a material which is not too hygroscopic, and good solder joints. Tracks carrying power need to be thick/wide enough. Pretty PCBs don't make better sound!
 
Hi and thanks again for the very interesting information
Sorry if i remains on the pcb quality ... this is the first kit i have found around ... no personal interest in sponsoring it but ...

GG+PCB+LR.jpg


a pcb of this quality is very very uncommon in commercial unit
I have one preamp here ... i would like to recapped it because it is about 20 years old
but it is so flimsy built that i am afraid to destroy it
A kit like the one above i could recapped hundreds of times without any particular issue, because it is clearly better built
For a company to build a good pcb should be no problem
For instance i see power supply traces very very thin ... but if the first thing that i would consider is bigger sections for ps lines ... why is that ?
The diy offers seem to me better designed ... i find this very very weird.
Ok .. there is the economic issue ... but at least for the pcb ... they are built in big numbers
Anyway i thank you very much again for the very helpful advice
Kind regards, gino
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.