Yeah, been there done that, agreed that it is a training/learning process and possible....also takes about 5 seconds.Many years ago, I demonstrated the difference between negative and positive feedback with a bike. The test subject was asked to reverse his hands on the handle bars (left hand to right handle and vice versa). That way, the phase of his feedback corrections was changed 180 deg making it pos feedback. He crashed within a few feet. 🙂
However, if you persevere, you can learn to ride this way relatively quickly; your brain needs very little time to internally reverse phase. Really works, I kid you not.
Jan
Dan.
This sine wave or otherwise path is indication/manifesttion of feedback system error/delay....As a matter of fact, the gyroscopic forces at play are minute. The reason you don't fall off your bike are minute corrections made by steering. The front wheel paints a sine wave over the line drawn by your rear wheel. This is classic feedback.
Wheel gyroscopic action introduces interesting feedback/damping function.
Dan.
Yeah, been there done that, agreed that it is a training/learning process and possible....also takes about 5 seconds.
Dan.
Call it whatever you want, it still involves a "memory" aspect which the opamps cannot implement. Thus any further reasoning based on analogy is completely futile.
My experimentation indicates otherwise at least at system level and finite time periods and peak levels.Call it whatever you want, it still involves a "memory" aspect which the opamps cannot implement.
Dan.
My experimentation indicates otherwise at least at system level and finite time periods and peak levels.
Dan.
That kind of memory you cannot "train", it's factory pre-programmed.
Unless, of course, you're going beyond some "absolute maximum values", which tends to radically "re-program" the chip. 😀
Nah, readily programmable, just like wines are trainable.That kind of memory you cannot "train", it's factory pre-programmed. . 😀
Dan.
I had a doughnut with sprinkles on it this morning, far more rewarding than this thread at the moment. (They came in colors so probably not opamps.)
An RIAA has three (four sometimes) carefully defined time constants with a transfer function that is well known, expressed for instance in the s domain. It doesn't matter how you make it either it's an RIAA or it's not. The amplitude and phase conform the the RIAA or they don't.
RIAA is nothing but a trade group that claims to represent the U.S. recording industry.
If you're referring to some standard published by them, please specify the exact document / version.
Everyone knows the red sprinkles are softer and have a gentle sugary flavor. The blue sprinkles are brittle and have a more "in your face" sugar delivery.
And tram rails will bring you down, still walking on clutches from a mishap 4 weeks ago 😎
As a matter of fact, the gyroscopic forces at play are minute. The reason you don't fall off your bike are minute corrections made by steering. The front wheel paints a sine wave over the line drawn by your rear wheel. This is classic feedback.
Oof, sorry to hear. Have had plenty of close calls and bumps and bruises from getting caught in a groove.
Just to clarify your point even further: the steering geometry on the bike has the tire contact patch behind the steering axis, and thus any deviation away from centered will be met with a reactive force trying to center the front wheel.
Another use for DIP opamps: throw a large number of them at a sheet of foam board. Voila, modern art.
"Just to clarify your point even further: the steering geometry on the bike has the tire contact patch behind the steering axis, and thus any deviation away from centered will be met with a reactive force trying to center the front wheel."
Or, its a castor.
😀
Or, its a castor.
😀
Do you even understand the difference between "signal analysis" and "system analysis"?
Or are you just trolling through equivocation?
The real fun starts when you reach the sophistication level where you understand that, with nonlinear systems with memory, Fourier analysis is as useful as feathers on a horse. Then you will get labeled as "Fourier denier"....
This is what you wrote, Frank reincarnate!
Interesting is when everything goes 'out of limits', ie both tyres are sliding and somehow you get it back under control...white knuckles and all, it translates to a learning experience.Don't forget ice, as I discovered this evening on an ungritted hairpin! I was exceeding grateful for an advanced feedback system to correct that.
Dan.
The real fun starts when you reach the sophistication level where you understand that, with nonlinear systems with memory, Fourier analysis is as useful as feathers on a horse. Then you will get labeled as "Fourier denier"....
Ah, a talking parakeet.... can you also bark?
Sorry right side...
Confused?
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
(guess those were not headphones...)

RIAA is nothing but a trade group that claims to represent the U.S. recording industry.
If you're referring to some standard published by them, please specify the exact document / version.
Daniel has provided a good link some posts back. See pages 13- 14 for the answer to your ‘question’ (References 1, 2 on page 29)
http://www.analog.com/media/en/training-seminars/design-handbooks/Op-Amp-Applications/Section6.pdf

Bell ringing
Being disrespectful toward members who contribute in a meaningful way here, won’t take you far. Neither trolling will.
George
Being disrespectful toward members who contribute in a meaningful way here, won’t take you far. Neither trolling will.
George
Note to mods I have an incredibly thick skin I just laugh off most of the comments.
Sorry right side... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edQF1ktiWgk
Interesting, never went much past your co-nationals of Fugazi.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGJFWirQ3ks
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- General Interest
- Everything Else
- What is wrong with op-amps?