I think we'd all love to hear about Albert's later "junk physics". Can you please cite such?
Why don't you cite them, Pete?
You have frequently been critical of Einstein's abilities, so let's hear what you have to say about his later writings.
You have frequently been critical of Einstein's abilities, so let's hear what you have to say about his later writings.
I think the burden of proof is on the claimant, in this case System 7, to prove his later physics was junk.
It may well have been. However, my earlier comments were about GR.
Given the amount of 'junk physics' (per Sabine Hossenfelder et al) around nowadays, I don't think AE has anything to worry about. GR is still the best explanation we have for how the universe works on a cosmic scale, DE and DM notwithstanding.
🙂
It may well have been. However, my earlier comments were about GR.
Given the amount of 'junk physics' (per Sabine Hossenfelder et al) around nowadays, I don't think AE has anything to worry about. GR is still the best explanation we have for how the universe works on a cosmic scale, DE and DM notwithstanding.
🙂
"With fame I became more and more stupid, which of course is a very common phenomenon." - Albert Einstein
"Anything truly novel is invented only during one's youth. Later one becomes more experienced, more famous, and more blockheaded." - Albert Einstein
Huh? Please refer us! I'm dying for your recognition of my intelligence.
your audience awaits.
Einstein spent much of the latter part of his career trying to develop a "unified field theory" which would bring together both the gravitational field (as described in his general theory of relativity) and the electromagnetic field.
He spent around thirty years searching for this unification, during which he isolated himself from the rest of the physics community which was focused on exploring quantum mechanics.
Einstein failed to find a solution, but did not regret spending so much time on the problem. He said he had already made his name in the world of science and that even a small possibility of finding a unified field theory was worth the time and effort.
Some of Einstein's insights and ideas may still prove true or help to guide future physicists to a solution.
I extracted/edited the above from this easy to assimilate source: https://www.ducksters.com/biography/scientists/albert_einstein/later-life-death.php
He spent around thirty years searching for this unification, during which he isolated himself from the rest of the physics community which was focused on exploring quantum mechanics.
Einstein failed to find a solution, but did not regret spending so much time on the problem. He said he had already made his name in the world of science and that even a small possibility of finding a unified field theory was worth the time and effort.
Some of Einstein's insights and ideas may still prove true or help to guide future physicists to a solution.
I extracted/edited the above from this easy to assimilate source: https://www.ducksters.com/biography/scientists/albert_einstein/later-life-death.php
No, show us where I've been critical of Einstein as you say. Unless of course you're still in jelly mode. Take your time.
I am currently searching.
Be patient, it's been a long thread!
P.S. My previous post was not directed at you, it was for general consumption.
Be patient, it's been a long thread!
P.S. My previous post was not directed at you, it was for general consumption.
Why we avoided Einstein:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/remembering-freeman-dyson/
You peeps are making me think here!
Consider these two branches of Geometry:
What is the difference?
Simply stated, one is analytic, the other is numerical.
Most Mathematicians can do both, if only to pass Exams.
I am probably more analytic personally.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/remembering-freeman-dyson/
You peeps are making me think here!
Consider these two branches of Geometry:
What is the difference?
Simply stated, one is analytic, the other is numerical.
Most Mathematicians can do both, if only to pass Exams.
I am probably more analytic personally.
These quotes suggested criticism of Einstein to my mind at the time and I remember reacting to them.
They form rather flimsy evidence, so I will apologise and withdraw my statement that you have frequently been critical of Einstein's abilities.
thank you
that had to have been a feverish pursuit. 😗
was his wife not a dedicated collaborator?
that had to have been a feverish pursuit. 😗
was his wife not a dedicated collaborator?
Last edited:
Things I know about Albert Einstein:
He didn't wear socks.
Couldn't remember where he lived.
Honestly, the man was a mess! 😳
On the plus side he confused the heck out of us with his Physics.
I think Quantum Theory is right. Even if "God doesn't play Dice." 😀
Not many people know this, but Albert won a Nobel prize, not for Special or General Relativity, but the Photoelectric Efffect:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect
I look at it a different way as a Chemist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_function
Hope it helps.
He didn't wear socks.
Couldn't remember where he lived.
Honestly, the man was a mess! 😳
On the plus side he confused the heck out of us with his Physics.
I think Quantum Theory is right. Even if "God doesn't play Dice." 😀
Not many people know this, but Albert won a Nobel prize, not for Special or General Relativity, but the Photoelectric Efffect:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect
I look at it a different way as a Chemist:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Work_function
Hope it helps.
That's it? Socks and where he lived? If that's all I had on my conscience I'd be broadcasting it!
OTOH, I can't respect a man who doesn't wear socks.
However for Albert I'll make an exception. 🙂
He spent some time (I don't know how long offhand) at the Institute for Advanced Study, apparently famous for having a lot of famous scientists there. From this quote I get the impression it's the place where great scientists go to retire:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_for_Advanced_Study#Criticism
- Status
- Not open for further replies.