SweeT, it would appear you had barely 5 hours of sleep last night!
You're like a grendel on speed.
(In the sci-fi novel, The Legacy of Heorot, a grendel is the top carnivore on the planet Avalon. A grendel can release a super-oxygenated blood supplement into its blood that enables short bursts of speed in excess of 100 miles per hour. This trait makes the grendels devastating, but ultimately proves to be their undoing at the hands of the colonists.)
And by the way Galu Your right.. 🙂
How the heck do you know anyways,
i thought these time stamps on the posts was hours oFF anyways, and although we more or less only use the 24 hour system in Norway i do nkow the difference of Am & Pm
i did kind of sleep a little on the low side last night why i usually get by with 5 or 6 hours, but if several night in a row under 5 i can get really tired... 😎
While on the bright side of things 🙂
The Nazi's Did Build almost the whole nortern part of norways railway network, strecthing some 2500 km from south here where i am, to the north... In he's desperate attempt to control the northern seas, and our coast is Still today litterd many places with leftovers and sunken nazi ships in our fjords, including one that carryed some mmh think it was 20-30 ton's of mercury.................... 🙂
The Nazi's Did Build almost the whole nortern part of norways railway network, strecthing some 2500 km from south here where i am, to the north... In he's desperate attempt to control the northern seas, and our coast is Still today litterd many places with leftovers and sunken nazi ships in our fjords, including one that carryed some mmh think it was 20-30 ton's of mercury.................... 🙂
What say you Galu... 🙂
Then,,
Half K series R should do the trick and not blow the Fuse, if shorted... 🙂
Then,,
Half K series R should do the trick and not blow the Fuse, if shorted... 🙂
Woow 🙂
Would you look at That, What a beuty.... 🙂
Althoug With a heck of a secondary voltage, of no less then 192 volts, Or if the dual Coils is series disconected Two Times 96 Volts.. 🙂
Or as i measured it With 225 volts In and 15 volt drop over the 4x27 Ohms-1oWatts, R's...
So as with 209 volts directly on the primary coil's i measured 179 volts on the secondarys, with witch divided would imply a
A winding Ratio Of, 1,17:1
Not much of a ratio really... 🙂 And since All 4 Coils are made of the same copper wire thickness, one could make a hefty two - three Tap AutoXFormer
Would you look at That, What a beuty.... 🙂
Althoug With a heck of a secondary voltage, of no less then 192 volts, Or if the dual Coils is series disconected Two Times 96 Volts.. 🙂
Or as i measured it With 225 volts In and 15 volt drop over the 4x27 Ohms-1oWatts, R's...
So as with 209 volts directly on the primary coil's i measured 179 volts on the secondarys, with witch divided would imply a
A winding Ratio Of, 1,17:1
Not much of a ratio really... 🙂 And since All 4 Coils are made of the same copper wire thickness, one could make a hefty two - three Tap AutoXFormer
Attachments
Man Does those PWM ZapPulse Amp's
(tho they Do kick *** i the bass region) Makes Lot'sa Switching Noise & Harmonics...... 😎
Although i've used a bunch of Ferrite Cores such as, 76, 73, 60, 43.....
In an effort to lower the receiver noise floor and i have managed to cut it to one third, i should also encase both The PWM Amps and the supplys before it will lower more... 🙂
Plus a Plethora of other unknown.?
Cores
Witch in any case only will make things better....
Despite All this and As seen on the pic One Of The Ground Returns, The Right way Proper RF Ground ReTurns.... When i hit The Fundamentel Switching Frequency @ 467 Khz,, 🙂 With My Proud Kenwood R-1000 receiver,
It Slams The Signal needle to the bottom at OVER 6o Db, Over S9,,
Or explained in more Audio Relevant terms it is a thousand times stronger then an already full strength S 9 Signal,,
And damned be Noise 😎
Every goddarn 467 Khz On the Dial, ALL THE WAY TO 30 Mhz, The whole HF band, I did'nt bother to count the number of harmonics, but they becomes Maaany..... 🙂 😎 🙂
mmmh Would it Be high time for A beer or many.... 🙂
(tho they Do kick *** i the bass region) Makes Lot'sa Switching Noise & Harmonics...... 😎
Although i've used a bunch of Ferrite Cores such as, 76, 73, 60, 43.....
In an effort to lower the receiver noise floor and i have managed to cut it to one third, i should also encase both The PWM Amps and the supplys before it will lower more... 🙂
Plus a Plethora of other unknown.?
Cores
Witch in any case only will make things better....
Despite All this and As seen on the pic One Of The Ground Returns, The Right way Proper RF Ground ReTurns.... When i hit The Fundamentel Switching Frequency @ 467 Khz,, 🙂 With My Proud Kenwood R-1000 receiver,
It Slams The Signal needle to the bottom at OVER 6o Db, Over S9,,
Or explained in more Audio Relevant terms it is a thousand times stronger then an already full strength S 9 Signal,,
And damned be Noise 😎
Every goddarn 467 Khz On the Dial, ALL THE WAY TO 30 Mhz, The whole HF band, I did'nt bother to count the number of harmonics, but they becomes Maaany..... 🙂 😎 🙂
mmmh Would it Be high time for A beer or many.... 🙂
Attachments
An IFOR is generally defined as any object not undergoing acceleration, that is coasting along, and experiencing no external forces.
So if there was only one object in the universe coasting along then it would have an IFOR. But then you could posit that would be meaningless because with reference to what? Since nothing else exists, how do even know its velocity other than with reference to c?
So if there was only one object in the universe coasting along then it would have an IFOR. But then you could posit that would be meaningless because with reference to what? Since nothing else exists, how do even know its velocity other than with reference to c?
Right, from a photon's perspective. I was questioning a previous statement declaring an accelerating object as remaining in the IFOR it was previously in. Hence my query. Or maybe I misunderstood the scenario...could very well be. My new universe has finally arrived intact, ie: my True Mirror. Somebody did us a favour reversing everything, that's fer sure!
Look away!!, I'm hi-hi-hid-e-ous
save yourself Galu!
Look away!!, I'm hi-hi-hid-e-ous
save yourself Galu!
Please, SGCM... skip all the Norway fairy tales and bomb things and whatever. This is to discuss Universe and its eventual expansion. Even if it is The Lounge, we need some sort of order. If you feel a strong need to discuss the mentioned subjects, dont hesitate to start a new thread.
Thanks!
//
Thanks!
//
I am not familiar with the above definition. Can you give a reference which uses that form of wording?
That definition suggests that an inertial frame is a property of the object itself - which is what I have been taking exception to.
Now, we're cooking with gas!
The motion of a body can only be described relative to something else - another body, an observer or even a set of spacetime coordinates - these are called frames of reference.
I have noticed a bit of repeating on my side... pointed out by "some" 😉 so I lay low, and rest my case :-D
BC rules !!! ✌️
//
BC rules !!! ✌️
//
Last edited:
So why then Galu do you struggle when I say an IFOR changes when an accelerating force is applied to one or both objects given I used the example of two bodies coasting along ie their motion was relative?
Suppose two people A and B are passengers sitting in a moving train carriage
From A's frame of reference B's velocity remains constant and A's is an inertial frame of reference.
A frame of reference in which an object does not change its velocity is called an inertial frame.
Now suppose person A is sitting in a train carriage which accelerates past person B who is standing on the platform.
From A's frame of reference the velocity of B is changing and A's is a non-inertial frame of reference.
It's tricky stuff to explain, but I think what I have summarised above is in line with your statement - do you agree?
P.S. Slight late edit applied.
From A's frame of reference B's velocity remains constant and A's is an inertial frame of reference.
A frame of reference in which an object does not change its velocity is called an inertial frame.
Now suppose person A is sitting in a train carriage which accelerates past person B who is standing on the platform.
From A's frame of reference the velocity of B is changing and A's is a non-inertial frame of reference.
It's tricky stuff to explain, but I think what I have summarised above is in line with your statement - do you agree?
P.S. Slight late edit applied.
Last edited:
Frame of refference without time is useless . Because after ( t+delta) the universe spatial dimentions and coordinate are going to change . For local use it can be used .
- Status
- Not open for further replies.