Nobody's making anything out of nothing but we have plenty of experience making nothing out of something. If the bots are taking over, we still have a ways to go in science to build/enable that scenario.
Oh, and computers are not living things.
Computers weren't always made of motherboards and CPUs you know! 🙄
Originally, a 'computer' was a person who performed arithmetic calculations.
At NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a talented team of women known as the 'human computers' was responsible for the number crunching behind the early US space program.
Attachments
Last edited:
Theres no difference between computer and us . U are wrong here . Infact we are computers . Programmed with one line code "
Everything we do alighned with this single line .
The is no one decision we make in our whole life that defy this code .
Think about it .
We collect data from outer world process it and try to avoid death .
It can be either from
1) physical aaccident
2)financial status
3) political
4) mental boredom
For me its appalling how a group of people can sit and listen to this jumbo bumbo and then afterwords discuss with the same seriousness as "yes, in order to build the road, we should have a ditch on both sides to take care of rain water...." How easy it is to be manipulated... hence all popular believes. All its seems to take is a well dressed, calm, well spoken man (not many women has started big movements of this/any sort) to gather like flies around a t**d.
Yet, the tangible world we live in seem not to be enough mysterious and intriguing for many - despite its tremendous richness and diversity. Odd.
//
Obfuscating the context of your premise does not make for an intelligent or meaningful conversation. I answered your statement accordingly. If you did not perceive what I meant you would not have been so clever.
Obfuscating: evading, fudging, waffling, darkening.
We could certainly do with less of that around here! 😉
We could certainly do with less of that around here! 😉
Of course! Best we can do is strive for a green death, no?
The violinist has his wires obfuscating. He should be smiling.
I am not that clever . You got me there . 😅
But still
Line between living and non living is fading .
Technology has gone too far . Theres no turning back .
Xiomi 11i charge 100% in 15 min
We take 20 min .
But still
Line between living and non living is fading .
Technology has gone too far . Theres no turning back .
Xiomi 11i charge 100% in 15 min
We take 20 min .
Member
Joined 2009
Paid Member
Everything it looks at is t optical infinity so you only have to ‘focus’ once and that should have been mostly designed in already so that were only after ‘adjustments’
As it cools down to near its operating temperature they will adjust the 18 segments to work in sync.
Even so, the estimate is very conservative, likely it will be operational much sooner.
Even so, the estimate is very conservative, likely it will be operational much sooner.
Oh. Why then should it focus at all and not just point and shoot? Or is it a matter of unravelling into shape?
Thank you boswald🙂
Thank you boswald🙂
- Status
- Not open for further replies.