And you're sure that you really understand these terms? Your setup is not symmetric (on the right side a opening, on the left side a closet) and there's furniture close to the speakers (early reflexions). Why control the "back wave" when the "front wave" is seriously compromised?
That's probably a subject you know a lot about.
I have not offered any opinion, only asked for information, which you have responded to with 'read my previous posts'. I have read them, they contain no relevant information.
I ask to what you are referring when you use phrases like 'musical sound space-time event' and have had no reply.
From the vagaries you have posted so I far conclude that you believe your speakers are superior to all else because they are very rigid (you have not explained what construction technique gains them this property) and that they use a bessel alignment in the crossover, I assume you are eluding to the fact that a bessel filter has the lowest rate of change of phase of any of the simple alignments... but you have never used terms like phase or group delay. This doesnt make for a very convincing case.
It could be the language barrier but it seems it is you that doesn't understand or know, or you could have articulated the information required easily.
You still have given no references/links/anything to the designer of these speakers, that would be most helpful in understanding you, as your posts make no sense.
This a classic... non relevant information....
I could say information that you are not able to understand!
Why?
Because you are so arrogant to think that you could understand in five minutes the results of years of research and development, having zero experience!
I have enough of this kind of discussion.....
Because I have no way to do it in this moment. If you want I can give you the telephone number and then it's up to you. Maybe you go to Rome and have some real experience!
😀 Bad exit strategy. You had the time to write countless posts with absolutely no relevant information. Why not write just one post that summarizes the "results of years of research and development"? I would love to invest more than 5 minutes to learn something new. That's why I'm here.
Well said! Thats the last I speak on the matter (tips hat to SY). 45... just one post summarising the "results of years of research and development" that you speak of.... please? Promise I'l try not to get confused 🙄
Hammer Time.
Interestingly enuff, i had this link passed to me today... looks like some intersting stuff (i've not had a chance to consume it yet. I have a feeling it may be relevant.
http://www.physics.sc.edu/kunchur/Acoustics-papers.htm
I was thinking the same thing earlier... i need to recover from moving a ton of dirt & rocks thou.
dave
When Bill Perkins did this on his PR2 (late 70s), i believe that the decoupling was something like 4 Hz. The same prinsipal is used on suspended turntables.
You'll find the same stuff used in anechoic chambers, concert halls, and theatres to decouple them from environmental noise.
dave
I've started reading. Very interesting.... start with the HiFi Critic summary.
He has shown that humans can detect time differences on the order of 5-6 usec (1/t = 200-167kHz).
As interesting was some of the lenghts he had to go to to not have the test gear corrupt the results.
dave
- Status
- Not open for further replies.