I am confused by the design details of voltage doublers, as I think terminology is often an issue.
Based upon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage_doubler
The terminology of half-wave = Greinacher = Cockroft-Walton
Full-wave = Delon = bridge = floating
So for the half-wave, diodes must be rated sqrt(2) * Vac, and caps rated 2 * sqrt(2) * Vac?
And for full-wave, diodes rated 2 * sqrt(2) * Vac, and caps rated sqrt(2) * Vac?
What is the ripple of each type of voltage doubler?
Based upon https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltage_doubler
The terminology of half-wave = Greinacher = Cockroft-Walton

Full-wave = Delon = bridge = floating

So for the half-wave, diodes must be rated sqrt(2) * Vac, and caps rated 2 * sqrt(2) * Vac?
And for full-wave, diodes rated 2 * sqrt(2) * Vac, and caps rated sqrt(2) * Vac?
What is the ripple of each type of voltage doubler?
Last edited:
The diodes need a 2*Vpeak rating.So for the half-wave, diodes must be rated sqrt(2) * Vac, and caps rated 2 * sqrt(2) * Vac?
Only the output cap needs 2*Vpeak, for the input one Vpeak is sufficient
YesAnd for full-wave, diodes rated 2 * sqrt(2) * Vac, and caps rated sqrt(2) * Vac?
The approximate formula remains applicable if you enter the right values: Vripple= Iout/(Fripple*C).What is the ripple of each type of voltage doubler?
For the first variant Fripple=Fmains and C= Cout and for the second Fripple=2*Fmains and C=C/2
In practice, due to second order effects, the ripple of the second variant will be somewhat smaller.
Note that for me, the distinction full/half wave is not very relevant: both use both polarities in some way, and a true full wave doubler requires twice as many capacitors and diodes
both schematic are identical, being both half wave type doubler.
only the capacitor placement differs, still in series with the coil. the cap ratings are indeed different, as the series cap mode has half the final voltage.
only the capacitor placement differs, still in series with the coil. the cap ratings are indeed different, as the series cap mode has half the final voltage.
???both schematic are identical,............... the cap ratings are indeed different,...............
How can the schematics be identical and yet impose different voltages on the capacitors?
In summary the circuits are identical, except the arrangement of diodes and capacitors is different, as is the voltage seen by one capacitor, the ripple frequency and the internal resistance....
for the half wave case ripple frequency is 50/60hz
for the second case, the full wave, ripple frequency is doubled, 100/120hz
i use the second one all the time...
for the second case, the full wave, ripple frequency is doubled, 100/120hz
i use the second one all the time...
on second inspection of the circuit the full wave is indeed full wave, one half wave is delivered by the diodes, the other half is delivered by the capacitor. so indeed the full wave has the double ripple frequency, just by clever placement of the capacitors. I have used the FW version up to 7Mhz
There can be a little problem with the Greinacher circuit.
If the capacitor on the transfo side is smaller than the other one it can get charged in two directions.If you use a smaller polarised capacitor put a diode across to prevent charging in the wrong direction.It makes also the rise time after turn-on shorter.
Mona
If the capacitor on the transfo side is smaller than the other one it can get charged in two directions.If you use a smaller polarised capacitor put a diode across to prevent charging in the wrong direction.It makes also the rise time after turn-on shorter.
Mona
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Power Supplies
- Voltage doublers, with rigour