Quack quack quackery 
That video was really cringe-inducing to watch - had to quit after 13 min.
C in that equation is defined in vacuum.
"In the Electrical universe" LOL
"So the the Earth knows where the Sun is right now" LOL
He doesn't even grasp what a dimension is mathematically.
Embarrassment to the species. Old dude who don't master math invents own logic to feel relevant.
One can see why they need their own convents to spread this kind of rubbish - sad really.
//
That video was really cringe-inducing to watch - had to quit after 13 min.
C in that equation is defined in vacuum.
"In the Electrical universe" LOL
"So the the Earth knows where the Sun is right now" LOL
He doesn't even grasp what a dimension is mathematically.
Embarrassment to the species. Old dude who don't master math invents own logic to feel relevant.
One can see why they need their own convents to spread this kind of rubbish - sad really.
//
"If you value your time and/or sanity, then under no circumstances should you willingly enter into debate with a crank. A crank's cognitive processes are impregnable to all forms of logic, reason, evidence and in extreme cases, basic facts."
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crank
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Crank
Unfortunately, it is not unknown for a scientist/mathematician to go off the deep end.
This guy was one of my math professors eons ago, he was a very smart nice guy. All I can figure out he ate too many mushrooms.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Swimme
I cannot think of a bigger badge of honor and commendation in these days...where does ridicule point?
It is astonishing that people that enjoy electronics do not embrace the idea that the nature of the Universe "is or may be electro-magnetic". The mathematicians have done a good job it seems...even modifying the equations arbitrarily whenever the results do not match the predictions.
Embrace... just because... what 8-o...
And that dudes statement like: "Science shall not be hard...." it shall be like in the olden days where one would touch and smell things...
"Feel facts" has no place in science. Sorry.
Music, painting, astrology, knitting, flower arrangement, asf ... yes, by all means - eat you hart out... but please let one area be - let science be scientific.
//
And that dudes statement like: "Science shall not be hard...." it shall be like in the olden days where one would touch and smell things...
"Feel facts" has no place in science. Sorry.
Music, painting, astrology, knitting, flower arrangement, asf ... yes, by all means - eat you hart out... but please let one area be - let science be scientific.
//
There's a lot more in there....
Science is not about feel, that's for sure. There is a strict epistemology for the Western Sciences based on empiricism, so it becomes an objective endeavor and as such "inductive logic" is invalid for a proof. That takes out the "It must be because I feel it must be so".
But the teaching of science is based upon rote repetition to create a "mind memory" just as athletes develop "body memory" to events. So, in that sense, the use of "inductive logic" is fundamental to the development of theoretical models that can later be demonstrated via objective, repeatable methods.
So... scientists are trained to "feel" the science... It's not a matter of just learning the equations, but having a "feel" for what those equations and models represent.
If we didn't have that, we would not have theoretical sciences. "Hmm... I feel that this is interesting, what happens if I make these assumptions?..."
- Status
- Not open for further replies.