If it's as opposed to another MP3, it ought to sound better. I suspect it's the EQ that does it.WAV as opposed to what?
MP3 has to be decoded in order to be played. Different decoders may produce slight differences in sound, say, maybe if lame verses if Fraunhofer.
Also, saving an edited file as MP3 will result in further lossiness. That's what MP3 encoders do.
Also, saving an edited file as MP3 will result in further lossiness. That's what MP3 encoders do.
As opposed to mp3. No new information is created, however the algorithm to convert wav to audio may work better in certain DACs, I don't know for sure.Exporting as WAV as opposed to what?
This mixing is really quite interesting.
Happy face EQ has been my favorite over the years.
Wav file data is already formatted effectively the same as PCM, which is what normally gets fed to a dac. In that case no conversion DSP is needed before sending sampled data to the dac. In other words, the underlying data is not altered.
In some cases wav file PCM data may be converted to DSD encoding before being sent to the dac. In that case some conversion DSP is performed before the dac.
For MP3, decoder DSP must always be used to convert MP3 data to PCM that can be then be sent to the dac.
Something else possibly useful to keep is mind is that every time a wav file, or an edited mp3 file, is saved as an MP3 file, it is lossy encoded yet one more time. Audio reproduction accuracy is further reduced with each new pass through the encoder.
In some cases wav file PCM data may be converted to DSD encoding before being sent to the dac. In that case some conversion DSP is performed before the dac.
For MP3, decoder DSP must always be used to convert MP3 data to PCM that can be then be sent to the dac.
Something else possibly useful to keep is mind is that every time a wav file, or an edited mp3 file, is saved as an MP3 file, it is lossy encoded yet one more time. Audio reproduction accuracy is further reduced with each new pass through the encoder.
Last edited:
Yes, that I will keep in mind.Audio reproduction accuracy is further reduced with each new pass through the encoder.
Meanwhile, something else has come up that is somewhat related. I am getting a noise through my speakers when no music is playing. What is revealing is that using a phone-based spectrum analyser, (JBL Tools) shows a marked difference with the amplifier on and off with no music playing, that is, the output from the speaker is different, there is a background 'noise' level.
Will run this thing off batteries and check the difference. The noise is not really audible, but must be having an effect on the analog signal to the speakers, and who knows what else.
Amplifiers can and do make noise - and not always the good kind! But you want to check if it's your source or the amp (or both). That's easy enough to do.
TLDR. Sounds like you want a compressor/limiter. Or you just need to turn the volume up. It's like complaining that your Porsche is boring to drive at 25 mph.
https://www.behringer.com/product.html?modelCode=P0CCX
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=Behringer+MDX2600
I suggested Behringer because their stuff is good value for money and a couple of notches better than the karaoke/bedroom-DJ brands, but visit local music stores and see what they have in used gear.
If you want to DIY:
http://www.thatcorp.com/4305_Low-Cost_Analog_Engine_IC.shtml
https://www.behringer.com/product.html?modelCode=P0CCX
https://www.amazon.com/s?k=Behringer+MDX2600
I suggested Behringer because their stuff is good value for money and a couple of notches better than the karaoke/bedroom-DJ brands, but visit local music stores and see what they have in used gear.
If you want to DIY:
http://www.thatcorp.com/4305_Low-Cost_Analog_Engine_IC.shtml
Came across this in the Behringer web site. If the vacuum tube sound can be simulated, is it implemented on other equipment? More relevant to this discussion, is there information added or subtracted by the tube effect?
https://www.behringer.com/product.html?modelCode=P0CCX
Revolutionary Tube Simulation
The secret behind the COMPOSER PRO-XL MDX2600’s incredible sound is our Tube Modeling processor, which exudes the very essence of tube and compression. This amazing circuitry accurately emulates the performance characteristics of highly sought-after classic tube compressors, creating a sound that is so rich in harmonic content – you’ll wonder where we hid the tubes!https://www.behringer.com/product.html?modelCode=P0CCX
Its a marketing gimmick.
Some of the best emulations are the ones that run in the boxes at: https://www.uaudio.com/uad-accelerators.html ...and even those don't sound like the real thing. Prices for plugins once you have the DSP box: https://www.uaudio.com/uad-plugins.html Reason people use them at all is because they are so much less costly than the real analog hardware.
Some of the best emulations are the ones that run in the boxes at: https://www.uaudio.com/uad-accelerators.html ...and even those don't sound like the real thing. Prices for plugins once you have the DSP box: https://www.uaudio.com/uad-plugins.html Reason people use them at all is because they are so much less costly than the real analog hardware.
Last edited:
I wonder how you would know that without ever trying an objective side by side comparison....and even those don't sound like the real thing.
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Line Level
- Using Audacity to equalize mp3 on CD