Before the discovery that the Sun was the center of the earth, we actually had a system of theory that could accurately predict the motion of the planets. They could make fairly accurate prediction, but the underlying assumption was wrong.
"Shut up and calculate"
I have a feeling that is today Standard Model. They may make the correct prediction, but the underlying understanding of the reality is incomplete.
"Shut up and calculate"
I have a feeling that is today Standard Model. They may make the correct prediction, but the underlying understanding of the reality is incomplete.
Rodger Ramjet...."You have the brain of a fruit-fly..."
ROFL...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick...
ROFL...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------Rick...
Here is the Go Fast UFO video debunked, the ufo travelling at 2/3 of the speed of sound is actually travelling at approx 20-40knots with the most plausible explanation being either a large bird or weather balloon. Easily explained by trigonometry and parallax.
And here is the Debunk of the GIMBAL Video of U.S. Navy Jet Encounter with Unknown Object. The plausible explanation is most likely another jet aircraft with an infrared glare artifact from the rotating gimbal camera system.
Put away your tinfoil hats, there's no alien invasion...............
And here is the Debunk of the GIMBAL Video of U.S. Navy Jet Encounter with Unknown Object. The plausible explanation is most likely another jet aircraft with an infrared glare artifact from the rotating gimbal camera system.
Put away your tinfoil hats, there's no alien invasion...............
Exactly, the growing doubts.
Superstring theory and others, being incompatible, are not researched by a bunch of obsolete scientist ;-)
They`re there because of the incompleteness of the others.
Curious if the next 10 years will result in a new, far bigger LHC to be built or a more complete model will emerge.
exciting times!
The debunk vids need some debunking themselves. They don't have all the facts to say anything conclusive.
Believe what you want the folks posting these clearly have considerable knowledge of how these instruments actually work (besides all the information is on the display). My limited experience with the folks that actually do the flying is that they don't.
If the Navy can't tell the difference between conventional flying drones, flying birds, or an airliner from some mysterious UAP, boys we are in a lot of trouble.
If all these vids are simply of conventional crafts, why are the Navy so afraid of releasing these vids? Why keep them all a secret? Ask yourself that.
Report Says Mystery Drones Hovered Over Navy Destroyers Off California Coast | NBC News NOW - YouTube
If all these vids are simply of conventional crafts, why are the Navy so afraid of releasing these vids? Why keep them all a secret? Ask yourself that.
Report Says Mystery Drones Hovered Over Navy Destroyers Off California Coast | NBC News NOW - YouTube
Why don't you think about it and tell us that 'if it was a hoax', what their motive(s) could be. 😎
then pick one
or all
🙄
then pick one
or all
🙄
A hoax perpetrated by the Department of Defense which will have to present a report in front of Congress by next month? This is not the works of some lunatic here. This comes straight from the DOD.
Since when has the defense department been forthright with Congress? Are you kidding?
lunatics are in the eyes of the beholders.
lately there have been plenty.
lunatics are in the eyes of the beholders.
lately there have been plenty.
Anyone still skeptical about this should just watch some videos of Bob Lazar when he talks about how craft have been reversed engineered by humans for years. He is very convincing and has been recounting the same stories for years.
Acknowledging things in the sky is only the first step in us accepting what is really going on. No wonder we arent told the truth, when many people are so loudly skeptical about pretty much everything.
What Im concerned about is if the US govt starts being honest about official sightings, then there will be an ulterior motive for this (instead of the former, usual "nothing to see here, its just a weather balloon). That approach obviously isnt working on the public anymore.
I have often wondered that if the US military industrial complex (or US government, same thing really) runs out of boogeymen on earth to start wars against, what is next? Quite literally, I think it may be contrived boogeymen from the skies. God knows that they have spent enough time and money to make perfectly functional flying machines by know. IMO most UFO sightings are black ops reverse engineered craft....
Acknowledging things in the sky is only the first step in us accepting what is really going on. No wonder we arent told the truth, when many people are so loudly skeptical about pretty much everything.
What Im concerned about is if the US govt starts being honest about official sightings, then there will be an ulterior motive for this (instead of the former, usual "nothing to see here, its just a weather balloon). That approach obviously isnt working on the public anymore.
I have often wondered that if the US military industrial complex (or US government, same thing really) runs out of boogeymen on earth to start wars against, what is next? Quite literally, I think it may be contrived boogeymen from the skies. God knows that they have spent enough time and money to make perfectly functional flying machines by know. IMO most UFO sightings are black ops reverse engineered craft....
Last edited:
Huh? 😕
Oh, you mean weeding out the kooks on a site advocating using electrolysis to extract hydrogen from water and then using it as fuel?
Guilty. 🙂
Last edited:
As one of the links stated, the technical folks in the military probably figured this all out and saying nothing is the SOP. In my opinion there is no reason to go six sigma off in any direction.
They might even tell us that it's perfectly natural to fall on the ground and that we don't break any physics laws.
Wink Wink 😉
You could be right. Then again, it weren`t the pilots that released this and the Navy surely must know what they released.
This would all be a lot easier if the radar data would have been released as well, now they could be playing games with us, be sincere yet dumb, etc etc.
In order for the debunk link to be right either the following must be true:
1. The Navy is so inferior that after analyzing the vid, they couldn't tell if it's from something conventional or some mysterious UAP. But somehow, a couple of guys from some fringe website got it all figured out without having the actual raw data. If the Navy is required to keep all the radar record of every bird or lear jet they captured, sh$t that's one hell of a waste of my tax money.
2. It's all a hoax perpetrated by the DOD. It's one thing to fool the public, it's another thing to fool the Congress since they have to report next month.
Both 1 and 2 seem equally unlikely.
1. The Navy is so inferior that after analyzing the vid, they couldn't tell if it's from something conventional or some mysterious UAP. But somehow, a couple of guys from some fringe website got it all figured out without having the actual raw data. If the Navy is required to keep all the radar record of every bird or lear jet they captured, sh$t that's one hell of a waste of my tax money.
2. It's all a hoax perpetrated by the DOD. It's one thing to fool the public, it's another thing to fool the Congress since they have to report next month.
Both 1 and 2 seem equally unlikely.
Last edited: