He might have a point though. This thread's topic and OP do not match
"Everything Else: Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc)"
This entire "Universe vs Solar System" thread probably fits better in the
Lounge. Perhaps merged with "What is the universe expanding into?"
"Everything Else: Anything related to audio / video / electronics etc)"
This entire "Universe vs Solar System" thread probably fits better in the
Lounge. Perhaps merged with "What is the universe expanding into?"
Last edited:
kenpeter:
You might enjoy this forum, it seems like it might fit:
Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
And it might be interesting to explain your views to these guys:
Illuminati-R-Us • Index page
You might enjoy this forum, it seems like it might fit:
Godlike Productions - Conspiracy Forum
And it might be interesting to explain your views to these guys:
Illuminati-R-Us • Index page
Yeah. How did it end up here? Did I put it here? I think it needs to expand on over to the Lounge. Will move.
perhaps I missed the point. It seemed like the original comparison was apples to oranges, so I proposed another similar comparison.
One might look at things like we are such a tiny part of the universe, or we can look at it like we are such a small element, yet we can study and understand things that are billions of light years in size. Not unlike a bacterium in a laboratory studying the university in which it's lab sits, or the whole world in which it dwells, or even, well, the universe. Except we can do it, and Mr.Bacterium cannot.
One might look at things like we are such a tiny part of the universe, or we can look at it like we are such a small element, yet we can study and understand things that are billions of light years in size. Not unlike a bacterium in a laboratory studying the university in which it's lab sits, or the whole world in which it dwells, or even, well, the universe. Except we can do it, and Mr.Bacterium cannot.
Yeah, my source is 11 years old, so maybe it's been nailed down more accurately since then. Or maybe both are SWAG's? 😀
Mike
How we like counting things. We'll never get bored of counting things, so it appears. Counting and measuring. Is this a sexual obsession? In origin, I mean. Anyhow, when I start thinking about the extension of the universe all I get is a vague nausea. Am I the only one?
I just love how a click or two away from the mundane routinely found here can take you to something like this:
A Calabi–Yau manifold, also known as a Calabi–Yau space, is a special type of manifold that is described in certain branches of mathematics such as algebraic geometry. The Calabi–Yau manifold's properties, such as Ricci flatness, also yield applications in theoretical physics. Particularly in superstring theory, the extra dimensions of spacetime are sometimes conjectured to take the form of a 6-dimensional Calabi–Yau manifold, which led to the idea of mirror symmetry.
Calabi–Yau manifolds are complex manifolds that are higher-dimensional analogues of K3 surfaces. They are sometimes defined as compact Kähler manifolds whose canonical bundle is trivial, though many other similar but inequivalent definitions are sometimes used. They were named "Calabi–Yau spaces" by Candelas et al. (1985) after E. Calabi (1954, 1957) who first studied them, and S. T. Yau (1978) who proved the Calabi conjecture that they have Ricci flat metrics.
then there's this conjecture:
A Calabi–Yau manifold, also known as a Calabi–Yau space, is a special type of manifold that is described in certain branches of mathematics such as algebraic geometry. The Calabi–Yau manifold's properties, such as Ricci flatness, also yield applications in theoretical physics. Particularly in superstring theory, the extra dimensions of spacetime are sometimes conjectured to take the form of a 6-dimensional Calabi–Yau manifold, which led to the idea of mirror symmetry.
Calabi–Yau manifolds are complex manifolds that are higher-dimensional analogues of K3 surfaces. They are sometimes defined as compact Kähler manifolds whose canonical bundle is trivial, though many other similar but inequivalent definitions are sometimes used. They were named "Calabi–Yau spaces" by Candelas et al. (1985) after E. Calabi (1954, 1957) who first studied them, and S. T. Yau (1978) who proved the Calabi conjecture that they have Ricci flat metrics.
then there's this conjecture:
Last edited:
This should be moved to Subwoofers as this is obviously a real low fs Tractrix.
Why wasn't universe radiated in 2pi? I think this will beam.
//
- Status
- Not open for further replies.