Ultra-high performance, yet rather simple - hybrid and more!

Evan , the super-pair with EF3 BJT's could be unstable - Val used a EF2 FET
arrangement.
My original Kypton V had issues except with large Cdom around the super-pair
stage. The same IPS without the baxandall was fine. CFA baxandall IPS
was also fine with the EF3.
I think both Thimios and Terry had these issues. 😱
Your bias should be 10ma centered trimmer @ 5.2ma VAS I (all 4 of mine were).

OS

Yes, Pete - this makes a lot of sense. Both EF2 HEX-FET and Lateral-FET direct-drive are fine, but EF3 introduces additional pole that can "change the picture", plus much lower input capacitance...
 
Yes, Pete - this makes a lot of sense. Both EF2 HEX-FET and Lateral-FET direct-drive are fine, but EF3 introduces additional pole that can "change the picture", plus much lower input capacitance...

Not an issue with your IPS 🙂 , Val .... but with my EF3.
Guru E. Stuart and keentoken informed me of "lack of Ccb" with my "V" and
E. stuarts "TIS".
At this point I could of added the extra driver comp. to my EF3. I did not ,
and changed the IPS to be compatible with the present OPS.
Most IPS's have plenty of Ccb natively and will "get along" with the EF3.
The same Baxandall on my CFA has a larger Cdom and a simple low Z
feedback network - VERY stable w/ the EF3.

Edit - CFA Baxandall has much lower CLG , as well.
OS
 
Last edited:
I've replaced the LEDs and retested. Voltage on the input is gone. My problem input board is just about perfect. PD - ND voltage is 2.2 volts across 100 ohm resistors with 120 ohms for R29. If I move R29 up to 150 ohms voltage drops to 1.75 volts. Is it better to be higher or lower?
The input board that I thought was good is showing 100mV offset on the output and 1.8 across PD-ND with 120 ohm R28.
 
I've replaced the LEDs and retested. Voltage on the input is gone. My problem input board is just about perfect. PD - ND voltage is 2.2 volts across 100 ohm resistors with 120 ohms for R29. If I move R29 up to 150 ohms voltage drops to 1.75 volts. Is it better to be higher or lower?
The input board that I thought was good is showing 100mV offset on the output and 1.8 across PD-ND with 120 ohm R28.

Ok, good. 1.75V across two 100R resistors give us 8.75mA - about perfect. That's what I use in my build, R29 = 150R. So, better leave 150 there.

The other board seems to have some issue - in normal situation, the circuit auto-balances down to some millivolts offset at the output...
 
Nothing really stands out as wrong here to me.
 

Attachments

  • Test Specs 3.jpg
    Test Specs 3.jpg
    488.7 KB · Views: 379
Can you please measure the voltage at the output of the DC servo op-amp (pin 6) - for the good one and the one with the offset. You can also try to swap the tubes for a minute. And also try to rotate R8 and see if there is some reaction with regards to the offset.
 
I assume that voltage drops over D3, D7 are all the same in both channels. Then voltage drop over R29 is also expected to be the same. Then the same R29 value will set the same bias, resulting in equal VAS current...
The question then - where is the difference?
 
I assume that voltage drops over D3, D7 are all the same in both channels. Then voltage drop over R29 is also expected to be the same. Then the same R29 value will set the same bias, resulting in equal VAS current...
The question then - where is the difference?

Voltage drop is exactly the same on all 4 diodes. I'm thinking the difference is likely whatever is causing my DC offset. I'm going to parallel another 47k resistor on R19 and see what happens. Pin 6 is still positive with negative DC offset.