I don't think it makes any significant difference in practice if you have a voltage amplifier because it has to damp one driver through the impedance of the other driver, series crossover components etc.Why should minor (bass resonance) Fs mismatches in serial MTM be much different from parallel MTM? 😀
I was pretty happy with my thought experiment on two basses in a common enclosure:
In an ideal World, it wouldn't matter how you wire it. But with a valve amplifier it would:
Ariel Speaker Page
Lynn always thought the Ariel worked better with valves. But separate enclosures. Maybe Jim is in a position to clear this up?
In the parallel config both drivers are effectively damped by the direct connection to the amplifier, or at least they are damped by the amplifier in series with the crossover, in parallel with the other driver which is still better than the series config.
tl;dr:
If your amplifier is a current amplifier then the series config is better damped. If your amplifier is a voltage amplifier the parallel config is better damped. If your drivers are perfectly matched it makes no difference!
Last edited:
I finally got Soundeasy set up and I took some measurements. I don't know how much I trust the data under 1k, but above 1k it seemed pretty repeatable. This indicates pretty poor tweeter matching, but interestingly, the flatter response is the tweeter that was pushed in. Once I get a little more fluent with Soundeasy I'll start testing the individual drivers.
![]()
Looks like the characteristic midrange bump around 900Hz due to cabinet and driver response. Here's what I know about this series of Scan drivers. Presumably your 15W/8531K03 have a really small magnet for closed box.
Ha. These drivers are nearly identical. The K01 just has a smaller magnet. 🙂
The 83dB, 24L vas,0.41 Qts 15w-8530k01
http://www.scan-speak.dk/datasheet/pdf/15w-8530k01.pdf
The 85dB, 24L vas, Qts 0.31 15w-8531k00
http://www.scan-speak.dk/datasheet/pdf/15w-8531k00.pdf
8530 means shiny coated cone, 8531 means uncoated matt finish. K00 and K01 describe magnet size which is more significant for bass tuning.
Paul Carmody's DIY Speaker Pages - Carrera
You'd just make the port smaller for the K01, wouldn't you? Or lose it altogether, or line it with felt. And take the tweeter down 2dB. Not rocket science. 😀
The 900Hz notch that a lot of people use is not realistic in a MTM IMO. Takes impedance too low:
Ellam-XT
Ellam-FLEX
But Zaph's ZD5 has better impedance in the MT form, so might be adaptable:
http://www.zaphaudio.com/ZD5.html
Those time delay circuits can be swapped for third order with polarity reverse.
Looks like the characteristic midrange bump around 900Hz due to cabinet and driver response. Here's what I know about this series of Scan drivers. Presumably your 15W/8531K03 have a really small magnet for closed box.
The magnets are the standard 8531 magnet, but as you can see from the pics, there are additional magnets added. Because of the high f3 and very small enclosure volume, I'm assuming these were added in phase with the original magnet to help lower the qts, allowing for an acceptable rolloff in a tiny box. If the magnets were added out of phase to raise the qts (such as a bucking magnet for magnetic shielding), it would dig deeper in a sealed enclosure, but that enclosure would need to be significantly larger. These cabinets are so full of bracing and ceramic plates that there's virtually no air volume. I'd estimate that there's only about .2 cubic feet for the two woofers to share.

But right now I'm much more concerned about the disparity between the tweeters than I am about the woofers.