Take a look at the LL1630, a better choice
If you look at the lundahl data sheet you will see that the performance is specified into a 10K load on the secondary side. (The secondary is not 10K, it is the source impedance divided by the square of the turns ratio ignoring the effects of the shunting inductive reactance of the primary at low frequencies) These transformers are tiny and can't handle an appreciable amount of power.. Note the application. They do not specify the load impedance for the distortion measurements which probably means solely into the input impedance of the measurement setup which would typically be at least 100K ohms based on my experience.
http://www.lundahl.se/pdf/1930.pdf
If you look at the lundahl data sheet you will see that the performance is specified into a 10K load on the secondary side. (The secondary is not 10K, it is the source impedance divided by the square of the turns ratio ignoring the effects of the shunting inductive reactance of the primary at low frequencies) These transformers are tiny and can't handle an appreciable amount of power.. Note the application. They do not specify the load impedance for the distortion measurements which probably means solely into the input impedance of the measurement setup which would typically be at least 100K ohms based on my experience.
http://www.lundahl.se/pdf/1930.pdf
Thanks Kevin. Though dsavitsk/ECP Audio has used them in parafeed with 32 and 300 ohm headphones (few other posts from Lundahl's AA forum which gave me the idea to use them).
Based on your comments I'd recommend you check with Kevin Carter over at K&K Audio, if there is precedent and they perform decently they certainly are reasonably priced. Their performance might possibly be acceptable even mis-applied with a low rp tube driving them? He will steer you towards the right transformer for your application even if that does turn out to be the LL1930 in the end.
Hi Friends,
Please, which better for 250Ω headphones?
600Ω OUT tr + parallel resistor
or
8Ω OUT tr + serial resistor
Thank you for the advice.
Please, which better for 250Ω headphones?
600Ω OUT tr + parallel resistor
or
8Ω OUT tr + serial resistor
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
Thank you for the advice.
Parallel, because you will have better damping.600Ω OUT tr + parallel resistor
Hi Friends,
Please, which better for 250Ω headphones?
600Ω OUT tr + parallel resistor
or
8Ω OUT tr + serial resistor
Thank you for the advice.
The description and schematic don't match...
I'd say 8ohms and parallel. If you have enough voltage gain for that of course. It would help to know what tubes you'll be using.
Hi, I posted this in the wrong thread. It's just another idea. Good or bad I don't know.
https://hollowstate.netfirms.com/man...s%20Manual.pdf
https://hollowstate.netfirms.com/man...s%20Manual.pdf
The description and schematic don't match...
I'd say 8ohms and parallel. If you have enough voltage gain for that of course. It would help to know what tubes you'll be using.
Oh, I'm sorry:
600Ω OUT tr + serial resistor
or
8Ω OUT tr + parallel resistor
Tube EL84 (likeky)
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- Transformers for valve headphone amps