Tony Gee's Capacitor page updated..

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think his subjective listening tests should be tempered with actual repeatable measurements, like spectral analysis, swept measurements, impedance sweeps (up above hearing range) phase plots. ESR, Impulse response, etc.

If there is an audible difference, some of these technical measurements will expose the difference in electrical properties.

Antone-
 
Last edited:
Using a cap in the passive XO is not the same thing as using in the singal path of an electronic device.
So, those tests while useful, must be taken with a grain of salt.

Tony uses them in a XO. (..larger values.)

Jon uses them in electronic devices. (smaller values.)

So you do have variety here (..between the two).

**Despite this however, their responses are generally quite similar.**

One of the caps that seemingly does NOT match up is the ubiquitous "Audio Cap Theta". However in that instance they weren't using the same capacitor. Jon (because of his use of a low value cap) - was using a 600V cap. Tony on the other hand needed a larger value and as a result was using a 200V cap.

Even the Tempo Electric test, for Loudspeaker use, matches up fairly well.

The Great Capacitor Shoot-Out

Unfortunately it also appears to be rather limited test group for the Loudspeaker section.
 
An insight into Tony Gee's ratings

I created a 6 pg. PDF document that is an attempt by me to add a new insight to to ongoing debate on capacitor performance as well as provide a large number of links and references that hopefully pull together much of the scattered information that already exists on the WWW regarding the subject material. Some of the links point back to a thread or two that originated here.

I'm not an industry insider and thus what I've written represents my personal views as an outsider.

I apologize that all the hyperlinks don't work. The ones with spelled out URL's do.

The file is too large to attach to this thread, so PM me and I'll send it to you.
 
Why? You don't like the Dayton Foil for signal coupling? I know he is testing mainly as crossover sized caps but he also has some smaller values listed which the rest of us look at for electronics mods.
They're ok, better than most electrolytic caps for coupling.

In a loudspeaker, I would rate them about the same as a basic Mundorf M-Cap.
 
Here is the latest:

Humble Homemade Hifi

Note that the Amp Ohm poly in oil is something of a high performance value leader (..though still not in-expensive). US supplier prices of the poly in oil:

Ampohm Polyester Film in Oil, Aluminium Foil Capacitors


Tony's findings with the Amp Ohm models correlate welll with the "Orgy of Capacitors" thread, and specifically the poly in oil:

Orgy of Capacitors: The Cap Thread - Page 16 - Head-Fi: Covering Headphones, Earphones and Portable Audio

I just bought some of those to try in my speaker project on my tweeters. I have been using Mundorf Supreme to good effect.

The Amp Ohms pretty well sucked in this instance. Not saying that they are bad caps, but the Mundorfs just seem to match better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.