Threshold CAS-1 Capacitors

See the attached schematics

I want to replace the tantalums as the Mr. Pass has suggested in some other topics discussing Threshold products.
In particular this amplifier has 2x 47uf/20v tantalum caps at the power stage, 1x 47uf/20v tantalum coupling cap at the line stage and not-sure-what-that-part-does stage 220uf/10v.

My plan is to use some well known caps such as elna silmic 2 but I am wondering if I can swap the input coupling cap for a better one - polypropylene film cap. 47uf film caps are really expensive, I wonder if I can replace it with lower nominal caps... For instance it does not have to be rated for such high voltage - 20v. If I am going to solder in a bipolar cap. I could do with 5v max - as far as I know the amp input sensitivity is bellow 2 volts.

What about its capacitance? My almost-non-existant electronics knowledge tells me that a cap and the input impedance form a high pass filter. I am not entirely sure what's the input impedance, but on some booklet I've seen it stating 75k. Hell, I believe we can agree that 10k would be the absolute minimum. With a 10k input impedance and 10 times lower capacitance 4.7uf cap I will have an f3 of ~4hz. And in case the impedance is actually 75k, f3 is even lower.

I am wondering if all this my rambling make any sense about swapping the input capacitor for a lower value polypropylene capacitor instead of maintaining the same nominal 47uf electrolytic.
Do you think it is safe to conduct this experiment in practice?
Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • CAS1.jpg
    CAS1.jpg
    372.1 KB · Views: 136
Last edited:
use elco bypassed with 1uF solid
Is there some general rule of thumb for picking the bypass cap value?
Wasn't aware of this bypassing practice. It seems that it does make sense - elcos impedance relates to the frequencies and bypass film cap partially address this - they are faster, tend have lower impedance at higher freq.
Now I must bypass every capacitor I will find in my life 😀.