According to the known working mechanical engineering models of support systems for the materials involved, the arches of Notre Dame are physically impossible. By approximately 46%. There you go. Those arches are fine by other materials. But the Stone in use? It has been analysed, yes. And the arches are 'flat out ' --impossible. It is also that one cannot repair or rebuild those arches. Ie, you or anyone else cannot recreate them-whatsoever.
This impossible fact and point hides--in plain sight. And few notice. Few notice that in the 12th century, the Templars did something quite awe inspiring. They show their strengths..to those who have the eyes to see. Esoteric sign for those who look and who are willing to continue looking and not hide truths from themselves due to it being 'uncomfortable'.
+99.99% of the people in the world will turn away from this subject and post.
But that's OK. The 'esoteric sign' of the mere existence of the arches--is not meant for them. It is meant for those who desire to look. For those who choose that particular avenue (of looking and seeing/grokking), due to their mental construction and the given point or time in their lives. And they eventually thank the Templars. As they should. One more deserved nail in the coffin of overbearing linear thinking, those arches are.
A unique point, those arches?
No.
One of a thousand or more..... if you go looking.
Here's another. Scott's avatar made me think of it. The Hindu Rig Veda. Vedic texts. Within, there are ~800 verses of detailed information on the design/construction of anti-gravity devices. According to modern cutting edge quantum and physics theory, they make absolutely stone cold *perfect* sense.
This impossible fact and point hides--in plain sight. And few notice. Few notice that in the 12th century, the Templars did something quite awe inspiring. They show their strengths..to those who have the eyes to see. Esoteric sign for those who look and who are willing to continue looking and not hide truths from themselves due to it being 'uncomfortable'.
+99.99% of the people in the world will turn away from this subject and post.
But that's OK. The 'esoteric sign' of the mere existence of the arches--is not meant for them. It is meant for those who desire to look. For those who choose that particular avenue (of looking and seeing/grokking), due to their mental construction and the given point or time in their lives. And they eventually thank the Templars. As they should. One more deserved nail in the coffin of overbearing linear thinking, those arches are.
A unique point, those arches?
No.
One of a thousand or more..... if you go looking.
Here's another. Scott's avatar made me think of it. The Hindu Rig Veda. Vedic texts. Within, there are ~800 verses of detailed information on the design/construction of anti-gravity devices. According to modern cutting edge quantum and physics theory, they make absolutely stone cold *perfect* sense.
I was able to draw sparks about 5mm long after taping a small jar cap onto the top of this plasma globe. The metal cap actually does not touch the glass, as the tap has squeezed it up. table salt will melt into balls and glow yellow. Salt water will give off waves of vapor that do not rise. It also etches paper. I am certain it will melt a small drop of solder. Any fluorescent lamp will light up when brought near it. Contact is painful.
This is my favorite plasma globe, I have not seen a nicer looking one...
At the top is a spark being drawn by a sewing machine needle. The ground wire is actually attached to my metal desk leg, in the background.
- keantoken
This is my favorite plasma globe, I have not seen a nicer looking one...
At the top is a spark being drawn by a sewing machine needle. The ground wire is actually attached to my metal desk leg, in the background.
- keantoken
Attachments
OK, I"ll bite- who decided that the arches were impossible? The one book I have on the subject (Jean Bony's "French Gothic Architecture of the 12th & 13th Centuries") seems to have missed this point and treats those arches as innovating the flying buttress, subsequently used in dozens of other cathedrals of that era.
Now indeed there were some issues with overstressing the walls (Not the arches), but that was handled in a totally non-exotic way by adding external supports at a later time, after the cracks started appearing.
Now indeed there were some issues with overstressing the walls (Not the arches), but that was handled in a totally non-exotic way by adding external supports at a later time, after the cracks started appearing.
In regards to things being mechanically impossible, I remember stories that Igor Sikorsky was told it was impossible to make a helicopter. Wrong on that count.
It was also said that the aerodyamics of the bumblebee made it impossbile to fly. Since that is obviously wrong, further studies figured out the mechanics behind it.
Peace,
Dave
It was also said that the aerodyamics of the bumblebee made it impossbile to fly. Since that is obviously wrong, further studies figured out the mechanics behind it.
Peace,
Dave
Has no one heard of insect antigravity?
I read quite a bit of this, and found it quite intriguing, though I have little to compare it to. Yes indeed. I do not know how credible it is, and it certainly seems prone to tampering by those who wish to distort - I was immediately skeptical upon entering the homepage of this website. Releasing a bunch of suppressed science suddenly and acting almost normal in doing so - zealously appealing to the audience is the first sign that someone has invested personal gain in whatever they're doing. This gain could be, if the skeptic in me is to be trusted, further distortion, and general obfuscation of facts below the noise floor. Then again, time will tell - or not.
http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm
- keantoken
I read quite a bit of this, and found it quite intriguing, though I have little to compare it to. Yes indeed. I do not know how credible it is, and it certainly seems prone to tampering by those who wish to distort - I was immediately skeptical upon entering the homepage of this website. Releasing a bunch of suppressed science suddenly and acting almost normal in doing so - zealously appealing to the audience is the first sign that someone has invested personal gain in whatever they're doing. This gain could be, if the skeptic in me is to be trusted, further distortion, and general obfuscation of facts below the noise floor. Then again, time will tell - or not.
http://www.rexresearch.com/grebenn/grebenn.htm
- keantoken
keantoken said:
The workings of plasma globes is well known, watch out for the orgone or is that ozone?
KBK said:
Vedic math is rather amazing, but I do not recall much in the way of construction of devices in the Rig Veda thought I have seen the flying carpets.
SY said:
And Ken reaches out and wags his finger at SY again.
There are no laws. You know this. There are only: 'Currently stable Theoretical suppositions that work in all instances, or currently "known" instances'. Sometimes not even then.
🙂
One must also work hard at NOT attempting to always place all instances in the framework of these 'theories'. Ie, the 'seeing what you want to see' issue-in whatever way it may present itself.
There is balance between the two viewpoints. I hope that one day you see that.
When you were a very small child, you thought that the nipple on your mothers breast was the end of the world.
When you were a 5 year old, you thought your house, block, family and immediate friends were the end of the world.
When you were a teen, you thought that your school, your friends, your television, books and city were the end of the world.
When you become a world traveling adult, you thought human education, knowledge, science and the earth were the end of the world.
~~~~~~~~~
What in this universe makes you thing the unfolding, the flowering of the new, the beginning of the grasp of the seemingly unfathomable..is done with you? What in the world would make you think that?
They said that Columbus was crazy. They said that Einstein was crazy. They said that Joe M. Varilla was crazy.
scott wurcer said:
You know as well as I do that my post was on-topic, and I assure you that my thoughts while posting were very cohesive to the topic.
Actually, I have two globes and I can smell ozone when I put them near each other.
I just took one apart and have been experimenting with just the flyback with no globe. I can draw sparks about 1cm long. Since just the flyback wire is sticking into the air the fluorescent bulbs don't light up so easily unless I touch them to the wire.
I am thinking that if I construct my own driver for the flyback I may be able to have myself a kirlian photography device.
I could put a webcam underneath and have nice videos and snapshots of things glowing purple.
I could also capture the IR part of the spectrum. Follow the link:
http://www.hoagieshouse.com/IR/
If I do this I will test at different frequencies and with different waveforms to see what kind of effects present themselves. I have not personally verified whether or not kirlian photography lives up to all its hype but this I will do.
- keantoken
keantoken said:
There's a topic here? Anyway, take a sweater off fast in the winter near a FL bulb neat effect.
American thanksgiving.
Be careful what you celebrate.
Know your history.
http://rwor.org/a/firstvol/883/thank.htm
Be careful what you celebrate.
Know your history.
http://rwor.org/a/firstvol/883/thank.htm
KBK said:
Ha, you actually think us Americans care about the real history behind any holiday?
Easter, Halloween, Thanksgiving, and Chirstmas are just reasons to eat, drink, and spend money on useless crap that eventually ends up in a landfill. It's the American way.